Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.

 

« Previous | Next »


Engrish Funny: But I’m So Hungry!


Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 85 Failures in Communication

  1. Tank668 says:

    Person who posted this obviously doesn’t know what a king cake is for.

  2. Research fail. King cakes are a thing.

    • Al says:

      That was not what they were saying the “fail” was.

      But there is not real fail here, other than someone not knowing what they are talking about, and thinking there is a fail.

      The other fail is that this made it to the front page.

    • Evelyn says:

      i agree with you. THERES SUPPOSED TO BE A BABY IN IT! lolz :)

  3. firitheryn says:

    There is a non edible baby in the cake. This is not an incorrect label.

  4. FL Pastor says:

    ^ ^
    It’s Mardi Gras time!!! For those that are not familiar with King Cakes, there is a plastic Baby somewhere inside there. Whoever gets it has to bring the cake to the next party.

    (There are advantages to having lived in New Orleans.)

  5. MarkL says:

    I don’t get it. King cake does include a non-edible baby.

  6. David, Chandler, AZ says:

    Certainly not an “Engrish Funny” let alone a fail.

  7. BrownFAce says:

    Engrish Funny Fail
    L2Culture
    noob

  8. msmls says:

    I’ll pile on. Person posting doesn’t have a clue.

  9. Brandy says:

    Who ever posted this failed to realize their failure.. King Cakes are supposed to have a non-edible baby in them.

  10. James says:

    Bring back the edible baby

  11. Simon says:

    “non-edible” baby — as opposed to an edible baby?

  12. Nylund says:

    Accurate description of the product. Where is the fail, “engrish” or otherwise?

    Would it have escaped being a fail if it said, “non-edible plastic baby,” or “non-edible toy baby,” instead? Cuz that’s getting pretty darn nit-picky.

    What’s next? Giving Hot Wheels a fail because it says it’s a ’60 Mustang instead of a “toy ’69 mustang?”

    • BC says:

      or giving hot wheels a fail because a ’60 Mustang doesn’t exist lol

      • DZ says:

        See how that zero is right there next to the nine? Easy to hit one when you meant to hit the other.

        Besides, there WAS a 1960 Mustang. They just called it the “Falcon”.

        • BC says:

          That’s like saying there was a 1900 Ford Focus, they just called it the “Model T” lol.

          Oh wait, I meant 1909… There was no 1900 Ford Focus OR Model T, silly me… Stupid confusing keys on my computer’s piano! (You know, because keyboard and piano are synonymous terms, much like Ford Mustang and Ford Falcon)

          LOL… fail

  13. Maurie says:

    I’m with James… Bring Back The Edible Baby! Not that there ever was an edible baby in King Cake. I did have an overzealous cake cutter once who gave me a piece with the baby’s head and my friend a piece with the body… I almost choked with laughter.

  14. Raven says:

    It may be a real thing, but it’s still pretty fail-tastic to embed a non-edible item in food.

  15. Tsalko says:

    They should have used instead: “non-edible baby shaped miniature toy”, to avoid related lame jokes and comments

  16. CMG says:

    The correct word is inedible. There is no such word as non-edible.

  17. Brian says:

    I was born and raised in Baton Rouge, and go to school at LSU. My cousins were born and raised in Berlin, Germany, and have come over to celebrate Mardi Gras. They know what a King Cake is just as well as I do.

    The poster is an idiot.

  18. Brian says:

    Correction: Didn’t read the Non-Edible part. Cake-Box Printer is an idiot.

  19. BrownFAce says:

    OMG $74 an hour, if only there were some way to go to said website and pay them to tell me about it… if only..

  20. Skapek says:

    Someone looks stupid…

  21. It would be a fail if the non-edible baby WASN’T in the cake.

  22. Colleen says:

    The fail is on the person who posted this. King Cakes generally have a small plastic baby inside and whoever gets it in their piece is then “King for the Day” and traditionally must provide the next King Cake.

  23. Eric Ryan says:

    If you know anything about Mardi Gras, you know exactly what king cake is. Fail.

  24. Chichicarnicawillis says:

    I think is redundant, all babies are nonedible… Unless you are cannibal

  25. Chichicarnicawillis says:

    We used to eat “babies” in my country… My country is well behind modern times… It is a feudal dominium… A wealthy, unscrupulous land owner mastered us… He made us pretend to eat “babies”, it was feces, actually… He used to call them “babies”… He had an infirm mind…

  26. macphile says:

    Posting fail. All the king cakes have plastic babies. It’s a thing. Way to waste our time.

  27. Peculiarist says:

    Heh…in Mexico there’s a similar thing, a rosca de reyes with little baby Jesus dolls, and whoever gets the doll has to bring tomales to a party in February.

  28. Babo says:

    Not Engrish. Not a Fail. Why is this post still up? (see other comments re: King Cake)

  29. austin says:

    The baby is suposed to be there

  30. Chichicarnicawillis says:

    …once well established as the appointed ruler, an anonymous entourage of for-hire torturers preceded his welcoming caravan… Pain was in town, for the long run…

  31. Chichicarnicawillis says:

    …Oh, what an unlawful carnage we had witnessed… The night was still at its birth niche… A cruel vision of the young praying for their demise… It will not be easily deleted from our memories… Pain is in town, for the long run…

  32. jonD says:

    uncultured swine

  33. Canoncowgirl says:

    RABBLE RABBLE RABBLE PLASTIC BABIES RABBLE!

  34. Candi says:

    I always wonder why some spammer’s posting about such a *wonderful* opportunity instead of taking advantage of it themselves…. /sarcasm

  35. Candi says:

    I don’t always ‘get’ the jokes on Fail, so I sort through the comments. Usually there’s someone who mentions what the joke is. Or isn’t, in this case. Thanks muchly to all who explained.

    I saw what I thought was a packaging fail today, but I stopped for a couple minutes to actually *read* the labeling. Wasn’t a fail, just my misinterpretation. So I avoided looking like a fool.

    This submitter should use the same caution.

  36. Mark says:

    So how is King Cake legal to sell, but Kinder Eggs are still banned in the USA???

    The “non-edible food product within a food product” is the reason Kinder Eggs are taken at the US border.

  37. CB says:

    I know about King Cake and I live in Northern Ontario Canada. Definitely not even ‘ha’ worthy.

  38. gregaaron89 says:

    They don’t put the baby in the cake anymore for safety reasons. It’s just sitting in the middle of the box

    So what’s the point of it then?

  39. Emetique Necrotica says:

    There is no such thing as a non-edible baby.

  40. nola boy says:

    who ever made this is an idiot. and is probably some yokel for Nebraska.

  41. Hovey says:

    Ugh…The fail is not the cake, but the fact that babies are even on the menu. Who normally eats human babies?(except cannibals.)

  42. plomax says:

    Is the fail supposed to be “non-edible”? Would it be inedible?

  43. t.smith says:

    They don’t put the babies in the cake anymore..anyhow


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up