
You have it forever; pay whatever it takes to not get it done the wrong way.
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Failbook: Football vs. Musical Theater | FAIL Nation: A Little too Sizzilin FAIL Next »

You have it forever; pay whatever it takes to not get it done the wrong way.
Just me or the tattoo is still pretty good for a 120$ job? It doesn’t look THAT bad (unless I’m missing something)
I agree. A Cloris Leachman tat for $120? What a bargain?
I agree. I have seen a lot worse.
especially with the one on the left being airbrushed on and all.
This^
Same thing I was thinkin….
No kidding. I don’t have an eye for exquisite art, but I really can’t say that the one on the left is literally 10x better than the one on the right. Your wallet certainly will think it’s 10X better though.
I actually like the one on the right better.
They both suck.
Well, let’s see…what to get? Skull? nah. Knife dripping blood? Nah. Celtic Warrior Design? Barbed Wire? Nah. Ooooh how about a droopy old wrinkled Indian guy???
better than spending 10x that for a airbrush that washes away.
Could be an old warrior. We do manage to have a few of those, though average lifespan of the Native American male is 42.
I’m guessing the right one is just more stereotype indian, while the left one is accurate, hence “you get what you pay for”.
The quality seems to be equal.
The quality is hardly equal. The one of the left is significantly better executed. It looks like a portrait, whereas the other looks like a sketch.
Yeah, Derp, it’s also airbrushed on. That’s painfully obvious. Edges. Look at the edges.
The one on the left..um..what body part is it?
I believe it is on the ribs of a female. Hence a bit of sideboob at the top.
Nope. That is the giant bicep of some meathead.
one zero )
Does anyone else think the one on the left looks Photo shopped? Look at the necklace at the bottom, why would they cut it off? And I’ve never seen a tattoo with as much detail, and I’ve seen my fair share of expensive tattoos.
If you look closely the one on the left is a full side of the body. The on on the right looks like an upper arm. You are going to have a lot more detail in the one thats 10x as big. The on on the right isnt bad for the size although I’m sure a better artist could have made the shape of the face more realistic.
left is airbrushed.
Nope. That is the giant bicep of some meathead.
And in ten years you wouldn’t be able to tell the difference…
Point made though, airbrushed or not. You honestly DO get what you pay for. If somebody is willing to give you an amazing bargin on something, it’s usually because
a) it’s stolen
b) they have almost no experience and need it (beauty schools, barber college etc)
c) the product is faulty.
Still, for $120, that’s an amazing tattoo. You’re lucky to get sh¡tty japanese characters for that.
hahaha….I can’t believe so many ppl here actually think the tattoo on the right is even half decent …. wow….it constantly amazes me the garbage that ppl have tattooed on themselves… even if the one on the left is airbrushed, the person got a point across and it is ABSOLUTELY true…. this “art” (quotes because the tattoo on the right looks like a middle school student drew it) is going to be on you for the rest of your life…get a great piece of art!
Agreed what is wrong with these people? The one on the left is absolutely amazing, solemn, proud, and it actually tells a story of a person. The one on the right looks like a doodle some 8th grader did on his notebook.
IT’S TECUMSEH
Man KISS was awesome.
The left one is not 1200 $. Who ever made these kind of crap comparisons is an idiot.
It wqas clearly for the sake of making it a multiple of ten. I think the left would cost 1g (aussie dollars) as it is a rib piece of high quality. The one on the right would be about 250.
Look at the one on the right properly guys, geeze. Yes, the lines are nice, but look at his forehead. Look at his NECK, look at the way that his head forms a perfect square, the one on the right is horribly deformed!
The one on the right looks like a zombie trannie.