Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.

 

« Previous | Next »


Ad Placement FAIL

epic fail photos - Ad placement FAIL

Submitted by: Michael

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 49 Failures in Communication

  1. Scuby says:

    fries of doom

  2. ace5762 says:

    Don’t worry, chips are different from fries.

  3. Scuby says:

    BRITISH PEOPLE GET YOUR ADS OFF MY DEADLY FRIES PAGE!!! YOU ARE THE REASON WE ARE SO FAT!!!

  4. TaiomiFox says:

    Looks more like a WIN to me~

  5. Capt. Zenos says:

    Actually I think it is a brilliant add placement. They talk about good food as being a reason to die, and here is an add for the best fish and chips in Surrey, Advertising 90% off.

  6. SteveWithAQ says:

    Can we put all of these into the same category? Something like “OP doesn’t understand how keyword ad placement works FAIL”?

  7. Bols says:

    This looks like a retarded blog to me. No fail here, so please remove this from failblog.

  8. normal person says:

    commentary fail!! mcdonalds fries are the best ever!!

  9. Trolololoolo says:

    everything seems to kill you nowadays.

  10. gurtol says:

    theres a big difference between english chips and american frence frys, french frys soak up more oil when there cooked

    • Jim Hawk III says:

      A fried sliced potato is a fried sliced potato. It hardly matters what one calls it. Correctly fried french fries [note the correct rendering of the plural] don’t soak up more oil.

      • gurtol says:

        No, french fries [yeah yeah i spelled it worng last time] are much thinner that chips from a british chippy and therefore soak up more oil. (don’t bother arguing back, im a chef. I know this.)

        • teh dOOche – Presidon't of teh Internetz says:

          So, you say a thinner (less volume) slice of potato soaks up more oil than a thicker (more volume) one. Astounding logic.

          Please, tell me where you are a chef so I can avoid to eat at that place.

          • Kate says:

            He’s correct.
            This is from New Zealand but science is science. http://www.chipgroup.co.nz/industry-standards/chip-size.aspx

          • Kate says:

            Oh and its surface area of the chips that is the issue, not the volume.

            • teh dOOche – Presidon't of teh Internetz says:

              But still. French fries have a larger surface area than English chips.

              • Kate says:

                No they don’t.
                That’s like saying a pencil has a larger surface area than a house brick.

                • teh dOOche – Presidon't of teh Internetz says:

                  What? When you would cut them out of the same potato then the French fry would have a smaller surface than the chip because the chip is thicker. Get it now?

                  | < []

                  Maybe I am confusing something here. French fries are thinner than English chips, or am I wrong?

                  • teh dOOche – Presidon't of teh Internetz says:

                    Oh, I made a mistake in my last comment, it should say “French fries have a smaller surface area than English chips.”

                    • Kate says:

                      I linked to a site above but the comment is awaiting moderation. Here is the main point copied and pasted.

                      The fat content of hot chips depends on both the thickness and the cut of the chips.
                      Thick-cut chips (>12mm) absorb less fat than thin-cut chips.
                      The Ministry of Health recommends adults eat about 60g fat each day.

                      • teh dOOche – Presidon't of teh Internetz says:

                        I get it now…I was being stupid, I thought about it like a beer can can hold less than a keg, but that’s not the reason why thicker chips are absorbing less fat than thinner fries. Regardless, I am looking forward to that link.

                        And, gurtol, I am taking back what I said. I guess, you’re good chef. ; )

                        • Kate says:

                          No problem! Hurrah all are happy.

                          Just to clear it up completely, here is what Wikipedia says on the subject:
                          Cooking fat penetrates a relatively shallow depth into the potato during cooking, thus the surface area reflects the fat content proportionally. Chips have a smaller surface area per unit weight than French fries and thus absorb less oil per weight of potato. Chips also require a somewhat longer cooking time than fries.

                        • Kate says:

                          So one chip has a larger surface area than one fry.
                          But 100g of chips has a smaller surface area than 100g of fries. Therefore gram to gram the chips have a smaller area to absorb te fat.

                        • teh dOOche – Presidon't of teh Internetz says:

                          Oh, thanks for that. I guess, I could have looked it up for myself…

                          And wow, an argument on teh Internetz without RAEG…ok, a little bit of RAEG in my fіrst comment.

  11. snaz says:

    Excellent Jim Hawk.

    Please note that frenched sliced vegetables are also known as julienne slices.

    I eat a lot of fried potatoes. I fry them at home like my Mother and Grandmother did. There are many different ways to fry potatoes. We never called them french fries, either.

    Because of the difficulty of buying rendered beef tallow or pure lard (not hydrogenated) I now fry in olive oil.

    My fried potatoes are not greasy or oily, either.

    I can’t eat the fast food french fries. They are horrible. Besides studies have shown that the vegetable oils used break down into carcinogens after one heating . Lard or beef tallow doesn’t break down as rapidly and can be safely re-used.

    No, I’m not fat. I’m 72 years old and work on a Texas ranch. It was 109 yesterday and I was outside, in the sun all day, doing trailer maintenance.

    • lulz says:

      72 & a Texan? i call bullshiz. no way you’d be using the internets if you were either of those descriptions, let alone both.

      on another note- they misspelled the artist’s name in the article. “Gret” should’ve been “Greg”… fail.

  12. Steve L. says:

    Fast food can beharmful? Who knew?

  13. Flexar says:

    Chips and frnech fries are not the same thing. Chips are 100% potato. Fries are 0.1% potato.

  14. Schaffer says:

    The days when Americans were told by right wing conservatives to rename French Fries Freedom Fries just because the French did not support the idea of the US going into war with Iraq. The same war that bankrupted us and had nothing to do with 9/11.

  15. zappafrank says:

    Frylock

  16. NastyMidnighter says:

    This image speaks to me more as a symbol of american imperialism than heart disease. show me a 400 pound person wheeling around walmart with cart full of junk food, then yeah, i can see heart disease.

  17. dtvk says:

    mcd’s french fries are one of the best in the business.

  18. Soldis1917 says:

    Dunno. That ad just makes me want to go shooting…


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up