Picture by: Unknown
-
-
Copy & paste this:
« Previous Marker Cap FAIL | Using a Fender FAIL Next »
» 82 Failures in Communication
Leave a Reply
Popular FAIL Videos
-
Recent Failures in Communications
alerad on WIN!: Back to Back Homer and C… Xebi on Bros: Different Culture, Same… gemlink on FAIL Nation: Literacy FAI… Beaunze on Bros: Different Culture, Same… jew force on School of Fail: Too Many … ohdear.... on Failbook: Also the Reason Why … Beaunze on Bros: Different Culture, Same… Me on Bros: Take Away the Fighting a… Chode on Bros: Different Culture, Same… Dr Hugh on Bros: Different Culture, Same… 
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
..i thought “naughty” candies were in the adult section..
It probably was. But great candy can be anywhere, you understand?
Not sure whether I understand completely. Maybe if I investigated it – send me the candy for investigation.
I do not have this candy. You will need to get in touch with this 12-year old California girl’s parents. Chances are, they’ve already sent the candy back to the manufacturer per their instructions. I hope this incident doesn’t have any effects on this youngster, and that she will turn out to be a great person. You understand?
And they were not amused.
I’m sure if i were the parents I wouldn’t think it was too great either. LOL! Do you understand?
Uhhhhh…
I hope you have a great day, Keiya.
Well… was the candy right, at least?
..don’t count on it, D.M. …
You may be right….? Have a great day!
Sounds like a win to me
agreed
Are they sure it referred to the chest area? With all those blanks, it’s hard to tell.
It’s a win!
America is fail.
Yeah, why do they have to censor the article?
Are they expecting children to read it?
Read the article text… a 12 year old has children?
Yup
..internal Fail recognition: +1..
Bob wins.
Failality
I think they meant that the candy is for children… But you’re right, it’s still a fail.
xD bobs right… and some girl in California is messed up o.O
I love the caption on the picture in the article.
“Nice t—, the candy said. Her parents were not amused.”
I must be a bad person because I would have been hysterical.
They should’ve wrote “Nice boobs”, that would’ve been okay, right?
or “nice vag”?
or “nice bush”
“nice bush”? ISWYDT very clever
Yes and we can say that it’s for breast cancer awareness.
W— i- m—- b- t—? C– a—– e——?
I — — ———- —.
Tell us something we DON’T know. We all KNOW what “t—” is supposed to be. And that’s exactly why it is inappropriate to be on a Valentine’s candy, dumbass.
*Sarcasm*
If that was supposed to be sarcasm, you have no idea how to be sarcastic.
If that was supposed to be sarcastic, then you’re not even trying.
….And so, here is the next creature on our safari. Technically human, the Retard seems to not even understand basic sarcasm. Quickly, let’s move on…contagious or otherwise, I feel dirty associating with such creatures.
V-day? You mean the day they lose their V-card?
Oh no! The naked body is gross and should be hidden away by all costs. That poor girl is going to have marks for life after this shocking episode. The only thing which can fix this is a bag of money.
Yes, that’s exactly the issue here. Naked bodies. Right.
Even worse: slang terms for parts of the body! My god, she’ll never recover from this abuse.
Especially in North Highlands CA of all places! PS – I doubt her parents “weren’t amused”, in fact, they probably laughed hysterically and THEN thought, “hey! Maybe we can make some money off this!”
there’s a naughty discount store?
HER PARENTS WERE NOT AMUSED
“A 12 year old California girl was shocked after discovering a naughty message on her children’s Valentine’s Day candy”.
Wait, wut?
Just barely inb4 the 1,000th time somebody’s said that.
damn you pedobear!
But everyone knows a tit is a bird! http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Tit_%28bird%29
I agree, theres nothing wrong with t—, the candy was obviously complimenting the little girl’s shirt.
What I want to know is why it says a A 12-year-old California girl was shocked after discovering a naughty message on her CHILDREN’S Valentine’s Day candy
why does this 12-year-old have children?
“they asked him send the candy back for investagation” that part didn’t look right to my. i am not a english teacher but i think it should say “they asked him to send the candy back”
*That *me *I *I
Learn to write English, than come rage about other people’s mistakes.
*then
sorry, i had to
“Nice t—”… her chest…?
Nice top?
Someone, possibly Bart Simpson, has been circulating Valentine candies with off-color sentiments. I’d like to remind you all that Valentine’s Day is NO laughing matter!
the fail is making a big deal out of it.
DOUBLE fail! Even more hilarious is that the pathetic online news article made it sound like it was a 12 year old that had kids and it was their candy… “her children’s candy” …. I think they meant “her childrens’ candy” … DOUBLE FAIL! lol online news reports are so pathetic.
No, the plural of “child” is “children,” so when you make that possessive, it’s just “children’s.” And I think “children’s” in this article is being used as an umbrella term meaning that the candy is for children—like men’s slacks means slacks for all men.
Yeah, its technically correct, but it does make it sound like the 12 year old has kids. They probably could have done a better job getting rid of the ambiguity, but its probably a very easy thing to miss.
“Oh…naggers.”
I think someone bought some candy from Despair.com in order to make some easy ‘lawsuit’ cash.
Online news articles are poorly written. The writer also spelled my city wrong. It’s Sacramento.
She is 12 and has children…?
They phrased it oddly. Makes it seem like they said she has children. They should have totally reworded that sentence.
Also, why is it labeled as “children’s candy”? It isn’t. It’s candy that children happen to eat, but it isn’t made specifically for children…
Somebody tell me this guy didn’t just Fail.
this guy didn’t just fail. did and done.
LOL, all the comments are funny . . . and yes, dumb people write this stuff . . . then again, in this day and age, i wouldnt put it past a 12 year old to have a kid. As well, knowing some of the 3rd graders (8-10 year olds) say worse walking down my street. So unless this girl is home schooled and never let outside to play, she has probably heard worse.
Well, they were nice, after all.
Could it possibly have said “Nice tots”? As in tater tots? I’m just sayin’.
..accentuate the positive..good tactic, sheila..
This article has a lot of grammatical errors, “A 12-year-old California girl was shocked after discovering a naughty message on her CHILDREN’S candy”? The article was just talking about the child and now it’s talking about the child’s mother? The article also states that the manufacturer says, “asked him send the candy” I believe it should say, “they asked him to send in the candy.” Obviously a fake article…
^ agree
soooo yeah…. other people noticed that the first paragraph is that a 12 YR OLD found a naughty message on her CHILDS candy… right?
They even spelled Sacramento incorrectly in the article.
The whole damn thing is a fail
Omigod so shocking and gruesome!!!1 Ffs, getalife.
…Well that’s why…..they bought it in the ghetto
Wait really a 12 yr old mother…..am I the only one that noticed that?
Sacramento*
A 12-year-old…with multiple children?
FAIL
Finally somebody noticed that…
Can this be classified as a win?
Am I the only one who noticed it mentioned the 12 year old’s CHILDREN?