Take a good hard deep — huh? You freakin pervert! Now come on — guy nekkid except his drawers peeking around the corner at a kid — I don’t care who ya are, that looks creepy.
oh? What do you think of when you see a guy hiding behind a door in his underpants (which seem to be bulging) while he smiles and takes a peek at some kid that, judging by the skin colours, isnt his?
…but I can see pedobear lurking under the tree. I understand now – the guy in the ugly underpants is just there to create a distraction so pedobear can pounce.
You’re right about that, the canon of the internets does speak of Pedobear being girls-only.
On the other hand, in a highly disturbing comic I’ve read somewhere, the Bear himself explain that calling him “pedobear” is somewhat of a misnomer, as “pedo” is a non-gender-specific prefix, while the name Shotacat clearly implies that he’s into little boys.
I guess this speaks of our partiarchal, heteronormative society where “pedo” automatically refers to a male who is into little girls. In this age of political correctness, the right thing to do would be to rename Pedobear to Lolibear, and create a new, gender-insensitive Pedo-mascot who would embrace children of the full gender spectrum (girls, boys, transsexual children, hermaphrodites, Eli from Let The Right One In) with his perverted love. Of course, we all know that the Internet neigborhood where Pedobear and Shotacat were born is far from being PC.
Yep, both Portuguese and Brazilians speak a variation of Portuguese (Pt-pt or Pt-br) that is very similar. You can tell this one is actually brazilian because in the lower left it says “cancer” instead of “cancro”. In Portugal we usually modify english words we “import” to make them sound better, brazillians don’t usually do that.
having latin blood makes you less able to tell good sexual behaviors from perversions: in Brasilia this add looks normal and even cute as for anywhere else it screams “RAAAPE TEIM IN 3… 2… 1… !”
This is amazing how people of United States of America call themselves ‘Americans’, like if anyone else living on the continents of America, north and south, are not worth of notice.
Start saying it: I am Statian. My country is United States of America. I do not own two continents.
Everyone someone says “Americans” there is at least one person to call the US arrogant for using the title Americans. Even when everyone else regardless of country of origin does the same damn thing. Get your own silly little country to start that and maybe we can get something going.
So again, you are an idiot, and your opinion is stupid.
Com’on, what’s the problem?! Let them call themselfs whathever they want! Or would you like them to call we “Federativean” because we live in Federative Republic of Brazil? Did you know that Brazil was once called “United States of Brazil”? (I don’t think it’s a matter of neo-imperialism, just think that etmologically it makes more sense)
————
Qual é o problema?! Deixa eles se chamarem como quiserem! Ou você gostaria que nos chamassem de “Federativos” porque nós moramos na República Federativa do Brasil? Você sabia que o Brasil já foi chamado de “Estados Unidos do Brasil”? (eu não acho que seja uma questão de neo-imperialismo, só acho que etimologicamente faz mais sentido)
Sorry, you are quite wrong. The name of the country IS America, the title adds in United States to describe the smaller individual bodies within the country of America.
United States of ‘America.’
the united states of america is a country with no name.
america is the whole continent, and this country is a group of united states that form a country but can’t think of a proper name. =)
it’s not that it looks perverted just because he’s in his underwears, but the fact that he’s looking over the door the kid with that smile on his face…
He’s smiling because it’s CHRISTMAS, and he’s sneaking because he doesn’t want to ruin the kid’s moment of getting up in the middle of the night to see the presents before everyone else.
Anybody who honestly sees something sinister in this picture, not just as an immature joke but something actually perverted, needs to get examined, because there is something wrong with them.
You fail to take into consideration the other elements in this picture. The man is sneaking up on a small child, while giving a text book child molestor smile. The underwear part is only icing on the cake.
Btw, only in where you come from would some older man sneaking around a home in his underwear be assumed to be the father of the small child he is sneaking up on.
I think there are a number of different issues: culture, class and perhaps even climate, that are having an effect on peoples’ reactions to this image.
Incidentally, when I saw your comment about the smile, I looked again – I’m not sure the smile would look creepy if the man was fully clothed. Certainly, the image stikes me as a rather nasty one but then, if I dig deep down into my own upbringing, I know that I can’t feel that it’s socially acceptable to wander around wearing nothing but underwear when there are family members or anyone else (other than just a lover) around. However, I know that that’s partly snobbery on my part – my father would never have stepped outside his bedroom door wearing less than a dressing gown but, having compared childhoods with plenty of friends over the years, I know that more relaxed standards were acceptable in other households.
It’s also possible that different social norms develop in different climates. In cold, northern climes (for me that’s mostly UK with a few years of childhood in north eastern US) perhaps we just automatically reach for more layers of clothing to put on.
There are cultural differences to the way that we’ve all reacted to the image. One thing that strikes me is that I can’t imagine any UK advert for adult underwear that would feature a child – I know that you see photos of families all wearing a brand of thermal undies, etc, to demonstrate a range of sizes but then there’s a reason for the children to be in the photo. In this particular case, the presence of the child seems gratuitous.
That’s not snobbery, it’s prudery. You feel uncomfortable with it because your dad brought you up that way, but if he’d routinely walked around in his underwear instead, it would hardly have traumatized you.
I’m sure the kid is there because it’s a Christmas promotion. The dad’s stance is a bit unnatural, no doubt so the photo will show off the subject of the ad better. And I must say this particular choice of pattern is eye-catching.
Your dog is very cute. I think you should consider buying him a bone, much better for his teeth than chewing on a package. Perhaps spend a little less time playing games and more time with your dog, so that he dosen’t want to destroy them.
Yeah I have to agree that I fail to see the fail here. Man in his own house at night in his underwear. Not a fail. Child seeking an early look at the Christmas presents. Not a fail. Father smiling because he is enjoying watching his child enjoy Christmas. Also not a fail. There is enough genuine fail that that we shouldn’t have to try this hard to turn something innocent into a “fail”.
Agreed, why should we be forced to just accept that it’s funny and enjoy it?
Not everybody wants to see pedophilia everywhere, maybe you should google how many pedophiles are in your area so you can meet a real pedophile. I guarantee there is at least one in your zip code.
I have been looking at the ad for over a minute and I still don’t see it. Reading other comments I am thinking maybe I am too old… For me there is nothing sexual in the picture.
Yeah, that’s what I thought at first. It took me a minute to realize that I was supposed to be thinking of pedophilia, like most Americans apparently do.
As an American, I have to say… I pretty much have the same opinion of the average American as you do. And historically speaking, we’re overdue for an empire collapse, so the national psychoses probably will get worse before they get better. But I have hope that eventually we will get our collective crap together.
Ok, I’m a Brazilian women and honestly there is nothing wrong with this ad. Guys, Christmas here has always passed 86 degrees Fahrenheit and after the Christmas party is over and everybody goes to sleep, and there is no one in your house except your family, it is normal that you circulate with underwear and nothing else (covering all private parts of course!)! And people don’t get that “pervert” idea not because we are “used to it”, it’s just because it’s always so hot in Brazil, that’s it! Don’t you guys know “Carnival” here in Brazil? People here have another culture, but we know what looks pervert and what doesn’t. It’s just a temperature issue
tyvm. people see pedobear in every picture that has a child in it nowadays. i didnt even get what was supposed to be the “fail” in this ad until i read your retarded comments.
one more thing: i saw some comments saying most brazilians are black… That’s no problem, although it’s incorrect (about 51% of brazilian people are white, specially in the southeast (Rio and São Paulo) and south regions) Ps: i’m from rio and i’m white =P
This ad is for a Brazillian underwear company, and it’s written in Brazillian Portuguese. It was vehiculated in a major magazine here, and, for us brazillians, there’s nothing wrong with the picture. It portraits a father-son moment, and only this.
I understand, however, how it can be misinterpreted for a foreign eye. Here, in Brasil, due the hot climate, it’s common to the males sleep only in the underwear, cause we don’t need ant layers of clothing.
And, the subject of pedophilia here it’s much more restricted to the news than to the day-by-day of an average person.
I think this guy is simply sneaking down in the livingroom to check out his own presents, and I think it’s actully a pretty funny comercial. Maybe it have something to do with me being Dane, and the relaxed look on nudety we have in Denmark, but I think this is just a childish father, not a pedo. But i have to agree in the part about his smile, it seem a bit pedo
1. I am United-Statesian.
2. I lived in Brazil for many years, am married to a Brazilian, and speak Portuguese.
3. When I saw this one, I thought the fail was that the piece of material over his junk looks like it was photoshopped on.
4. Many Brazilians I know sleep nude, so couldn’t you say he got dressed to go out and check on his kid?
5. Hasn’t your kid ever seen you in your underwear without you molesting him? Or didn’t you ever see your dad in his underwear without him molesting you?
I don’t have much of a perverse mind when it comes to these things, but he really does look like he’s about to jump out and kidnap that kid. It doesn’t convey a cozy image of mum & dad watching their kid smile over presents… it’s really just… creepy.
I do agree there’s a bunch of things that show up around here that must have been submitted by 12 year olds who see naughty everywhere. But I will agree, this looks sketchy.
And for the record, I understand about Brazil being hot and not wearing much, and I usually don’t sleep with much on either, but gawddam, put some clothes on before ya step out of the bedroom, k????
It’s known that socks, ties and underware are the most commom gift that we, fathers, get. Handkerchievs too.
The advertising is of underware. In this case, SantaClaus is the kid. The father will get the underwear as a gift from his son. The father is looking while the kid is puting the gift under the Xmas tree.
Its very funny how people see pedofilia everywhere, especially if they’re from USA.
To think that the guy in underware’s not the kid’s father, and is planning to rape him, is sick.
——
É sabido que meias, gravatas e cuecas são o presente mais comum que os pais costumam ganhar. lenços também.
A propaganda é de cueca. E o papai noel, no caso, é a criança. O presenteado é o pai, que está atrás da porta, vendo o papai-noel deixar o presente embaixo da árvore.
Agora, no FailBlog, chega a ser engraçado como as pessoas desvirtuam a coisa. Realmente, pensar em pedofilia, nesse caso, só pode ser coisa de americano neurótico, mesmo.
Imaginar que o cara de cueca seja qualquer um, menos o pai da própria criança, só pode ser coisa de doente.
Ha! Pedo bear`s secret identity
Mr. Pedo is not great for Homeland Security.
Hide yo’ kids, hide yo’ wife, they rapin’ err’body out here.
Tut tut – it’s not the rest of the world’s fault that Americans think of sex when they think of children.
Take a good, hard, deep look in the mirror and ask who’s the fail
Making tut tut then looking in the mirror is so great!
Take a good hard deep — huh? You freakin pervert! Now come on — guy nekkid except his drawers peeking around the corner at a kid — I don’t care who ya are, that looks creepy.
oh? What do you think of when you see a guy hiding behind a door in his underpants (which seem to be bulging) while he smiles and takes a peek at some kid that, judging by the skin colours, isnt his?
this is not english, ergo not american you dips**t.
…but I can see pedobear lurking under the tree. I understand now – the guy in the ugly underpants is just there to create a distraction so pedobear can pounce.
Except Pedobear only likes little GIRLS. It’s that cat-thing that likes boys.
Wish you people would get your memes right.
How can you tell its a boy
Shotacat?
PEDOBEAR DOES NOT DISCRIMINATE
Pedobear is an equal opportunity molester?
You’re right about that, the canon of the internets does speak of Pedobear being girls-only.
On the other hand, in a highly disturbing comic I’ve read somewhere, the Bear himself explain that calling him “pedobear” is somewhat of a misnomer, as “pedo” is a non-gender-specific prefix, while the name Shotacat clearly implies that he’s into little boys.
I guess this speaks of our partiarchal, heteronormative society where “pedo” automatically refers to a male who is into little girls. In this age of political correctness, the right thing to do would be to rename Pedobear to Lolibear, and create a new, gender-insensitive Pedo-mascot who would embrace children of the full gender spectrum (girls, boys, transsexual children, hermaphrodites, Eli from Let The Right One In) with his perverted love. Of course, we all know that the Internet neigborhood where Pedobear and Shotacat were born is far from being PC.
Tyberius, I nominate you for the best comment ever.
omg i just started laughing my as$ off wen i saw this here at the library. im also high
Have you been a good boy? Well bend over and I’ll put a present in your stocking.
“Is that mr. Santa”
Only in America would a dad walking around his own home at night in his underwear be seen as perverted.
Then thank goodness this ad is Brazilian!
it looks Italian to me
its brazillian =D
it’s portuguese
its brazilian (look at the email near “failblog.com”)
I thought Brasilians were mostly black.
How can you tell if he’s got a Brazilian? He’s still got his knickers on!
Owned!
It’s Welsh
Duh!
please tell me you are joking
but better yet, look at the prostate cancer warning above failblog.org
def portuguese, even though the brand is Italian
don’t Brazilians and Portuguese speak the same language, just with some variation? hence you have Brazilian-Portuguese and Portuguese.
Yep, both Portuguese and Brazilians speak a variation of Portuguese (Pt-pt or Pt-br) that is very similar. You can tell this one is actually brazilian because in the lower left it says “cancer” instead of “cancro”. In Portugal we usually modify english words we “import” to make them sound better, brazillians don’t usually do that.
Oh… and the email shown is .com.br not .pt. That might be a better giveaway if you can’t understand Portuguese lolol
Brazilian… I’m from there, and this brand is not even a italian thing, just a name.
The .com.br it’s the brand web site: http://www.cuecasduomo.com.br
having latin blood makes you less able to tell good sexual behaviors from perversions: in Brasilia this add looks normal and even cute as for anywhere else it screams “RAAAPE TEIM IN 3… 2… 1… !”
Stupid latin people >:|
(says the french canadian XD)
For latin people is hard to understand the american obsesion with pedophilia…they see pedos everywhere…. it’s kinda sick you know…
Exactly. There’s something sick with a society that thinks “pedo” almost every time there is even an element of intergenerational nudity.
Well, America’s heritage and mindset as a country was inherited from Puritans. So, there ya go.
Pardon my ignorance, but what the hell do 21st century perverts have to do with Puritans?
Brazil is an american country…south america
OMGWAT
This is amazing how people of United States of America call themselves ‘Americans’, like if anyone else living on the continents of America, north and south, are not worth of notice.
Start saying it: I am Statian. My country is United States of America. I do not own two continents.
Idiot.
Everyone someone says “Americans” there is at least one person to call the US arrogant for using the title Americans. Even when everyone else regardless of country of origin does the same damn thing. Get your own silly little country to start that and maybe we can get something going.
So again, you are an idiot, and your opinion is stupid.
Ignorant troll is ignorant.
Actually, Billybob makes a valid point. How many times do you see someone here say “stupid US-ians”?
Com’on, what’s the problem?! Let them call themselfs whathever they want! Or would you like them to call we “Federativean” because we live in Federative Republic of Brazil? Did you know that Brazil was once called “United States of Brazil”? (I don’t think it’s a matter of neo-imperialism, just think that etmologically it makes more sense)
————
Qual é o problema?! Deixa eles se chamarem como quiserem! Ou você gostaria que nos chamassem de “Federativos” porque nós moramos na República Federativa do Brasil? Você sabia que o Brasil já foi chamado de “Estados Unidos do Brasil”? (eu não acho que seja uma questão de neo-imperialismo, só acho que etimologicamente faz mais sentido)
Olha a constituição de 1891:
http://www.planalto.gov.br/ccivil_03/constituicao/Constitui%C3%A7ao91.htm
Sorry, you are quite wrong. The name of the country IS America, the title adds in United States to describe the smaller individual bodies within the country of America.
United States of ‘America.’
the united states of america is a country with no name.
america is the whole continent, and this country is a group of united states that form a country but can’t think of a proper name. =)
Noooooo, “North America” is the continent.
But the “Fail” label is American.
Regardless, not a fail.
it’s not that it looks perverted just because he’s in his underwears, but the fact that he’s looking over the door the kid with that smile on his face…
He’s smiling because it’s CHRISTMAS, and he’s sneaking because he doesn’t want to ruin the kid’s moment of getting up in the middle of the night to see the presents before everyone else.
Anybody who honestly sees something sinister in this picture, not just as an immature joke but something actually perverted, needs to get examined, because there is something wrong with them.
He’s a dirty paedophile and he’s just found a new victim. You’re just delusional.
you are a sad, colsed minded person.
Well, “someone” is going to have a merry christmas.
I think it’s more his position and expression combined with his lack of clothing than the lack of clothing itself.
i agree…. this is so lame…
You fail to take into consideration the other elements in this picture. The man is sneaking up on a small child, while giving a text book child molestor smile. The underwear part is only icing on the cake.
Btw, only in where you come from would some older man sneaking around a home in his underwear be assumed to be the father of the small child he is sneaking up on.
I think there are a number of different issues: culture, class and perhaps even climate, that are having an effect on peoples’ reactions to this image.
Incidentally, when I saw your comment about the smile, I looked again – I’m not sure the smile would look creepy if the man was fully clothed. Certainly, the image stikes me as a rather nasty one but then, if I dig deep down into my own upbringing, I know that I can’t feel that it’s socially acceptable to wander around wearing nothing but underwear when there are family members or anyone else (other than just a lover) around. However, I know that that’s partly snobbery on my part – my father would never have stepped outside his bedroom door wearing less than a dressing gown but, having compared childhoods with plenty of friends over the years, I know that more relaxed standards were acceptable in other households.
It’s also possible that different social norms develop in different climates. In cold, northern climes (for me that’s mostly UK with a few years of childhood in north eastern US) perhaps we just automatically reach for more layers of clothing to put on.
There are cultural differences to the way that we’ve all reacted to the image. One thing that strikes me is that I can’t imagine any UK advert for adult underwear that would feature a child – I know that you see photos of families all wearing a brand of thermal undies, etc, to demonstrate a range of sizes but then there’s a reason for the children to be in the photo. In this particular case, the presence of the child seems gratuitous.
That’s not snobbery, it’s prudery. You feel uncomfortable with it because your dad brought you up that way, but if he’d routinely walked around in his underwear instead, it would hardly have traumatized you.
I’m sure the kid is there because it’s a Christmas promotion. The dad’s stance is a bit unnatural, no doubt so the photo will show off the subject of the ad better. And I must say this particular choice of pattern is eye-catching.
That said, I do regularly go around my house in nothing but underwear. Body taboos do nothing for anyone and I’m NOT encouraging them in my own child.
TL;DR
tl:dr
Honestly, most of the time, it’s not, but people on this site love to take things like this and overreact to them.
That said, I personally wouldn’t go around in my underwear around my children, but that’s just my own personal preference.
I require you to take off your hat.
getting a little frisky there
come here santa got a ,,gift” for you
suck on this candy cane?
He has a “big package”.
No, no no, the joke is best things in SMALL packages.
Have you ever wondered why you never actually see misses Clause, even though it’s generally accepted that there is one?
Now you know.
Although, you obviously have seen mr. Santa Claus? >.>
HAHA brazillian undewear!
That’s incredibly lame ….. still more hilarious than all FB posts of last 2 weeks.
Your dog is very cute. I think you should consider buying him a bone, much better for his teeth than chewing on a package. Perhaps spend a little less time playing games and more time with your dog, so that he dosen’t want to destroy them.
Yeah I have to agree that I fail to see the fail here. Man in his own house at night in his underwear. Not a fail. Child seeking an early look at the Christmas presents. Not a fail. Father smiling because he is enjoying watching his child enjoy Christmas. Also not a fail. There is enough genuine fail that that we shouldn’t have to try this hard to turn something innocent into a “fail”.
Yeah right.
It’s all innocent enjoyment until someone pokes an eye.
Or pokes something else.
Tom Brady?
Aw stop being so damm serious folks! Just just assume the dude is NOT the kids dad and enjoy a good pedo/creeper joke! Sheesh!
Okay, show me a good pedo/creeper joke and I will laugh. This is not one.
*agrees*
Failblog fail in this case.
Agreed, why should we be forced to just accept that it’s funny and enjoy it?
Not everybody wants to see pedophilia everywhere, maybe you should google how many pedophiles are in your area so you can meet a real pedophile. I guarantee there is at least one in your zip code.
… Except not everyone has a zip code or a pedophile data base they can search.
I have been looking at the ad for over a minute and I still don’t see it. Reading other comments I am thinking maybe I am too old… For me there is nothing sexual in the picture.
Same here. It looks like something was badly photoshopped in the crotch region? Is that what we’re supposed to be laughing at?
is it that his underwear are on backwards???
Yeah, that’s what I thought at first. It took me a minute to realize that I was supposed to be thinking of pedophilia, like most Americans apparently do.
As an American, I have to say… I pretty much have the same opinion of the average American as you do. And historically speaking, we’re overdue for an empire collapse, so the national psychoses probably will get worse before they get better. But I have hope that eventually we will get our collective crap together.
everything is wrong about this
Come see what Santa has in his stocking for you little boy…
I thought the fail was that he has no junk.
I am sorry, but this dude is hot. He has a fantastic body. This is a win in my book.
Thank you!!! Total win!
its a fail because it looks like he wants to molest the kid. its not a judgement on his body
agreed!
Great body, but no basket. Is that the fail?
Take a seat over there…
I think this is just another adorable father-son moment on Christmas Eve. Enough of these “Pedobear” comments.
Critics these days.
Ok, I’m a Brazilian women and honestly there is nothing wrong with this ad. Guys, Christmas here has always passed 86 degrees Fahrenheit and after the Christmas party is over and everybody goes to sleep, and there is no one in your house except your family, it is normal that you circulate with underwear and nothing else (covering all private parts of course!)! And people don’t get that “pervert” idea not because we are “used to it”, it’s just because it’s always so hot in Brazil, that’s it! Don’t you guys know “Carnival” here in Brazil? People here have another culture, but we know what looks pervert and what doesn’t. It’s just a temperature issue
Oh and the fail for me are those socks on the boy! He would be melting!
90% of Brazilian women are extremely ugly… Are you one of those?
Nope! 90% of americans are overweight….are you?
tyvm. people see pedobear in every picture that has a child in it nowadays. i didnt even get what was supposed to be the “fail” in this ad until i read your retarded comments.
Gosh… i’m brazilian and i’m telling u guys it’s from brazil (even the brand is from brazil!)
one more thing: i saw some comments saying most brazilians are black… That’s no problem, although it’s incorrect (about 51% of brazilian people are white, specially in the southeast (Rio and São Paulo) and south regions) Ps: i’m from rio and i’m white =P
OMG A PEDOBEAR! KICK HIM!
Where to? Is he American as always?
Just for north americans this is about pedophilia… And yes, Brazil is an american country.
Ronaldooo!! He Shines a lot in Curintia
Bem cs sao tudo americano, e tao tudo achando q isso eh italiano..haha..
vao tudo caga no mato!!!!!
CHELSEA FC RLZ!
Meio burrinhos, não? rs
aham…eles devem ter aquela visao q aqui so tem macaco e carnaval msm…
mas aqui pra curitiba esse negocio de calor nun funfa nao..hehe
This ad is for a Brazillian underwear company, and it’s written in Brazillian Portuguese. It was vehiculated in a major magazine here, and, for us brazillians, there’s nothing wrong with the picture. It portraits a father-son moment, and only this.
I understand, however, how it can be misinterpreted for a foreign eye. Here, in Brasil, due the hot climate, it’s common to the males sleep only in the underwear, cause we don’t need ant layers of clothing.
And, the subject of pedophilia here it’s much more restricted to the news than to the day-by-day of an average person.
i wouldn’t mind if mommy swings her bells around this even legal but why is that man wants to show his underwear to his kids
Another moment of pride for Brazil…
It only gets weirder when you see the small letters in the lower left corner, who say something about prostate cancer and regular rectal exams.
I would not mind waking up to find him in my house! Yummy
*Wolf whistles*
Hell yea!
I still think it`s Pedo bear
“Oh in the name of morality!”
Well, reading all the pedo comments on a picture that has absolutely nothing sexual about, I know how ‘morality’ is established:
It takes a perverse mind to find another.
Good job, people. Instead of just one perverse, you have revealed a page full.
Dude looks like he’s about to jump out and scare the kid, and his underwear hurts my eyes. *shrug*
hide yo kids
Hey! I use those too =D
I think this guy is simply sneaking down in the livingroom to check out his own presents, and I think it’s actully a pretty funny comercial. Maybe it have something to do with me being Dane, and the relaxed look on nudety we have in Denmark, but I think this is just a childish father, not a pedo. But i have to agree in the part about his smile, it seem a bit pedo
Agreed.
1. I am United-Statesian.
2. I lived in Brazil for many years, am married to a Brazilian, and speak Portuguese.
3. When I saw this one, I thought the fail was that the piece of material over his junk looks like it was photoshopped on.
4. Many Brazilians I know sleep nude, so couldn’t you say he got dressed to go out and check on his kid?
5. Hasn’t your kid ever seen you in your underwear without you molesting him? Or didn’t you ever see your dad in his underwear without him molesting you?
uhm no? but he has shopped boner
It’s not shopped, unless you people have never seen a bear of skivvies the fabric is different in the ‘jewels’ region.
This is silly, saying ‘United Statian’ is like someone from the republic of congo calling themselves ‘Republican.’
I don’t have much of a perverse mind when it comes to these things, but he really does look like he’s about to jump out and kidnap that kid. It doesn’t convey a cozy image of mum & dad watching their kid smile over presents… it’s really just… creepy.
This pic is wrong. On so many levels.
Well see, pedophile or not, I would do awful things to that man. ;D
The only problem is the fake junk. I think that’s the fail here.
…Santa Claus is coming to town…
poor kid, but looks like its pedo-rape time!
I do agree there’s a bunch of things that show up around here that must have been submitted by 12 year olds who see naughty everywhere. But I will agree, this looks sketchy.
And for the record, I understand about Brazil being hot and not wearing much, and I usually don’t sleep with much on either, but gawddam, put some clothes on before ya step out of the bedroom, k????
Why is Tom Cruise stalking Will Smith’s kid in Brazil?
lool
lOLOLOLOLOLOLOLOL
It’s known that socks, ties and underware are the most commom gift that we, fathers, get. Handkerchievs too.
The advertising is of underware. In this case, SantaClaus is the kid. The father will get the underwear as a gift from his son. The father is looking while the kid is puting the gift under the Xmas tree.
Its very funny how people see pedofilia everywhere, especially if they’re from USA.
To think that the guy in underware’s not the kid’s father, and is planning to rape him, is sick.
——
É sabido que meias, gravatas e cuecas são o presente mais comum que os pais costumam ganhar. lenços também.
A propaganda é de cueca. E o papai noel, no caso, é a criança. O presenteado é o pai, que está atrás da porta, vendo o papai-noel deixar o presente embaixo da árvore.
Agora, no FailBlog, chega a ser engraçado como as pessoas desvirtuam a coisa. Realmente, pensar em pedofilia, nesse caso, só pode ser coisa de americano neurótico, mesmo.
Imaginar que o cara de cueca seja qualquer um, menos o pai da própria criança, só pode ser coisa de doente.
worst advertising of Brazil 2010.
Brazil was a Portuguese colony.
48.4% are white does not matter anymore
This didn’t strike me as pervy-looking at all.
Pedo-bear doesn’t look as bad as i expected. I wouldn’t mind being out in the little kid’s position O.<
Pfft, don’t care about the kid or the fail, the dude is hot.
I wouldn’t mind sitting on his lap and telling him what I want for Xmas…
it’s written “comfort is trendy” in Portuguese
Pedobear would be proud
If any living creature EVER sees me in my underwear, I feel honor bound to molest it (and I’m not an USian).
be thankful that little boy got some condoms in that box hes holding!
The real fail is simply that those are the UGLIEST underwear ever. *unsee*