Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.

 

« Previous | Next »


Passenger Luggage FAIL

Submitted through the FAIL Uploader

This video is also viewable at: Funny or Die | DailyMotion

Incorrect source or offensive?

» 289 Failures in Communication

  1. Little Girl Blue >ZAP!< Dot Org - Marius's Sista From Another Mista and Starfishy's Gutta Buddy and Wearing Small Bits of ZA says:

    Excess baggage…

  2. nightshayde says:

    Oh. Oh dear. Oh my. Oh darn.

  3. eXistys - Don't steal my nickname, for once, PLEASE! : says:

    She’s “screwed”.

    • ZombieApocalypse - wearing a heavily soiled and blood soaked ~I ♥ Bloggy~ t-shirt and riding a pale zombie horse named Pooka says:

      Not yet.

  4. Marius says:

    Do they charge extra for overhead bags?

  5. ppg says:

    …and some journalists are too stupid to notice that.

  6. Leila - Marius's Otha Sista From Another Mista says:

    Every relationship has its own baggage.

  7. Judy says:

    Yes, Leila, they scanned your bags and found Bob. You should have left it in your luggage, not your carry-on.

  8. Leila - Marius's Otha Sista From Another Mista says:

    BOBBY!!!!! :mrgreen:

  9. Aja says:

    Carry On Baggage.

  10. Marius says:

    This is not your father’s way of humping bags.

  11. Astragali says:

    Heck, you gotta do *something* during those long flights…

  12. Starfish says:

    Looks like she wanted to join the mile high club by herself.

  13. Judy says:

    The funny part of this fail is that this actually happened to one of the women in our group when we went on the cruise a few years ago. She wasn’t the least bit embarrassed about it.

  14. chez says:

    It seems to have a cord too. Passengers may now use portable electronic devices?

  15. Say g'night, Gracie; wearing "I ♥ AA and AE" shirt with pride says:

    B.O.B FTW!

  16. Lolmaster3000 says:

    Hell Yeah ‘Galileo’!The 60 seconds about ‘What you should know about security checks at the airport’ seen on Prosieben, Germany!

  17. SalsaYogurt says:

    What’s that mysterious buzzing noise coming from seat 14B?

  18. dice says:

    pretty sure that’s a win.

  19. guitargeek says:

    Haha galileo did this py purpose, for attracting more viewers^^

  20. Stefan says:

    I’m pretty sure it happens all day long.

  21. ¡Great Scott! Me transmitte sursum, caledoni ▲Caution slow posts▲ says:

    Since she’s already getting screwed for the cost of the ticket…

  22. Marius says:

    So that’s what they mean by express air male service.

  23. Leila - Marius's Otha Sista From Another Mista says:

    No. It’s a pickle.

  24. tktk says:

    the real fail is that no one noticed it’s actually a bomb because everyone thought it was a sex toy.

  25. Kvn says:

    this isnt a fail. prude americans…

    • Chris says:

      agreed.

      • changeling says:

        Here it’s not so much that American sexual attitudes are prudish, as it is that FailBlog sexual attitudes are twelvish.

        • nightshayde says:

          Well … I’d have to say that American sexual attitudes are rather prudish. People here seem to have the idea that it’s fine for kids to watch shows with all kinds of violence (including domestic violence), but that it’s not fine for kids to see two men kissing (somehow two women kissing isn’t quite as objectionable :roll: ), or to have any sort of kinky fetish stuff going on in a show. They switched a CSI episode from the 9pm hour to the 10pm hour a few weeks ago because of the sexual content (a company was selling womens’ used panties to men who liked the scent). Why is that more objectionable than violence?

          *climbs off soap box & runs away*

          • nightshayde says:

            Oh — and that HUGE uproar a few years back about Janet Jackson’s “wardrobe malfunction.” Way too large a segment of the population was horrified that their children had seen a *gasp* nipple for a fraction of a second. “How can I explain that to my children?!!!” “Oh – teh horror!!!”

            Good grief!

            • Marius says:

              I, for one, never objected to the act. I objected to the absence of choice. If I do not want to watch something I turn the channel. Getting ambushed by objectionable content is wrong. Defending the act by blaming my oversensitive morals is in line with screaming fire in a crowded movie theater and saying I can’t take a joke.

              • nightshayde says:

                I’m all for having a warning that some viewers may find content objectionable & then letting people change the channel (rather than getting ambushed) — but I really think that the idea that kids will be traumatized for life by seeing a nipple for less than a second is ridiculous.

                I’d much rather let my child see strangers’ nipples than have her see people getting shot/stabbed/beaten & I find it odd that so many people in this country find sex more objectionable than they do violence. :sad:

                • Marius says:

                  Agreed. We are a violent life form. The need to protect the clan has been reinforced over and over throughout history. Preparing the young for conflict has always been of great importance to the community. The modern result is seen even in our everyday activities. Sex, however, has taken a wrong turn with the development of family. Promiscuity is a problem when dealing with clan hierarchy. It is even further hampering for women in a male dominated society. Throw in religion and society’s attempts to regulate inheritance (for the good of the people) and you have a lot of repression to overcome.

                  • Dragonwriter says:

                    Plus I have serious problems with an !mage of a woman’s body being deemed “objectionable content”. I’m with nightshayde. Male nipples = *yawn*, whatever. Female nipples = “OMG WON’T SOMEONE THINK OF THE CHILDREN???”

                    So I will freely admit that I do have something of a problem with people who view women as being “objectionable”.

                    (Sorry AGAIN for the eventual double post!)

                    • Marius says:

                      Yes, the whole “Think of the children” was defiantly the wrong argument. Choice is the point of contention with me. At some point in history the female breast became part of the sexual organ package. Whether we agree with that or not is besides the point. The majority of our society feels this way and to have their choice taken away because a minority has no problem with it goes against my grain.

                      P.S. I find it amusing that I have no problem with exposed breasts until my daughters enter the picture. Then everyone is a pervert. :)

                  • Marius says:

                    The twelve-year-old mentality is still inside all of us. It is just repressed and re-enforced by our social mores. The forbidden fruit, so to speak. Finding an outlet, whether with friends or, as is the case here, on an anonymous form, seems to be socially acceptable. I neither condone or condemn as I am not qualified to judge. I submit to you, is the real question: when does an outlet become a distracting obsession?

                    • fluffy says:

                      You can ask that same question about other things, too. Alcohol, for example. I know a lot of people will disagree, but personally I think that turning alcohol into “forbidden fruit” makes for a society of alcoholics who dive into drinking as early and as often as possible.

                      • Marius says:

                        Weeeee! Fluffy gets me! :)
                        *Squeeze*

                      • ~DrB~ says:

                        {{{Marius!}}}
                        Where I am we have seen a shift from a predominant Euro-cultural influence, to a strong bias towards a US influence. There are all sorts of effects of this, but one I find disturbing is the shift toward simulated or actual violence being a norm. Along with this influence, there has been a shift toward conservatism regarding sexual content or nakedness.

                        As a father, I find this a grotesque imbalance in our culture.

                      • Marius says:

                        DrB! Long time no see.
                        *Squeeze*
                        This shift, while grotesque, has very deep roots. Whenever a clan perceives a threat the natural reaction is to become fierce and protective. As I stated previously, preparation for a possible conflict is very important to survival. Aggression must be encouraged and the skills needed honed.

                        Females are extremely important for the survival of any group, therefore, in times of stress, they must be protected, hidden, made less attractive to any possible enemies of the clan. In other words, tone down their sexuality so they will not attract rivals.

                        Religion is not the cause, but rather just another means of reinforcing core behavior.

                        Bury all this under centuries of emerging societies and no one can tell you why you find killing is okay, as long as you dress properly.

                      • Marius says:

                        Au contraire mon frere. Europe falls right into the model. After two world wars your population was set back to 1870 levels. That coupled with an underperforming birth rate (in France especially) and you have immense pressure to procreate or become overwhelmed by other populations. By the 1950s Europe had only managed to reach pre 1814 population levels. Meanwhile, America was roaring along at just under a 2% growth rate. The only hic-up being 1918 with the influenza outbreak netting a .06% loss. This can be linked to the relaxing of morals during the roaring 20s. Even during WWII the U.S. was experiencing over 1% growth. By 1950 the Baby Boom produced a 2.05% jump. This coupled with the Red Menace contributes to the Anti-sex pro violence of the post war era.

                        God, I love torturing history to fit my arguments. :)

                      • Arthur Eld says:

                        Err, isn’t the growth rate for the US substantially fueled by immigration? And btw, after WWII we were extremely prudish for decades. That changed in the mid to late 60s, but the first nipple in a German movie was a huge scandal. Methinks you’re indeed torturing history a bit (should I say “enhanced historic argument”? :-) ) – I wouldn’t accept a single feature of the human character as the explanation for complex developments of and within societies.

                      • Marius says:

                        Can not the European prudishness be the result of war and invasion? The relaxation of morals only appearing after the shock of war subsided?

                        As for immigration substantially fueling our population, I’ll give you some stats.

                        Average immigration per 1,000 current residents:
                        After 1914 – 2.3
                        20s – 3.6
                        War years – .4
                        47 -60 – 1.5

                        U.S. birthrates per 1,000 current residents:
                        1910 – 33.9
                        1920 – 30.95
                        1930 – 24.05
                        1940 – 22.65
                        1950 – 28.15
                        1960 – 27.4
                        Not as big a bump as you would have thought, no?

                        You have my argument backwards. Nothing is “The” explanation for human character, but, complex social development does effect the human character.

                      • Marius says:

                        Ah, I see the problem. Low birth rate/population and fear of be overwhelmed by immigration from neighbors = high promiscuity. (Crank out those babies or lose your identity.) Fear of aggressive neighbors = prudishness. (Here they come, hide the women and pass the ammunition.).

                        Humans are a social animal but an animal no the less. We try to regulate our behavior with laws but in the end survival of the group reigns supreme. The shift in public morals in Germany is necessary for your survival. Unfortunately, new developments are having their effect. Economics has always played its part but the big factors are birth control and the sense of world over population. You can make your clan as sexually active as you want but how do you get them to have children when they can choose not to? Why would you have a kid if there are no jobs or farm families in need of child labor? With the pressures of immigration and low birth rate I would expect an increase in aggression coming your way.

                        Disclaimer:
                        The views stated above are overly simplistic and do not necessarily reflect the views of Failblog or its staff.

                      • Arthur Eld says:

                        Interesting thought! Would that mean that your birth rate is actually so high that it leads to prudishness despite the (existing, or so it seems to me) fear of being overwhelmed by immigration and the non-existing aggressive neighbors? Or is someone perceived to be a real threat to the US?

                        I’m more used to seeing developments in history in terms of social, political – cultural processes than in psychological impulses or patterns of behaviour. That’s an interesting angle you got there, Marius!

                      • Marius says:

                        I highly recommend reading A History of Warfare by John Keegan. It is a brilliant work.

                      • Arthur Eld says:

                        Keegan? Mmm, okay, will do. Although his books – those I read until now – weren’t among the most convincing works. I liked his history of WWI, not so much his WWII history and “The Face of Battle” made me wonder what he was aiming at the whole time.

                      • Marius says:

                        I agree with you on his WWII history. Have you tried Keegan’s “The Battle for History? I have found it a most valuable resource for WWII study.

                        “The History of Warfare” will help you to understand the point of “The Face of Battle” (One of my favorites). Have you tried his “The Book of War”?

                        Have you read any Liddle Hart? I am interested to know what you think of his work.

                      • Arthur Eld says:

                        No, the books I mentioned are all that I’ve read from Feegan. I’m unsure about L. Hart – the name rings a bell, but I don’t think I own any of his books. Maybe I’m confusing him with Jonathan Lidell.

                      • Arthur Eld says:

                        *snork*

                        Keegan!

                      • Arthur Eld says:

                        *doublesnork*

                        And the other guy is Littell.

                      • Marius says:

                        Freegan? Is he the guy I find going through my garbage all of the time?

                        Sorry, I forgot you’re German.
                        *Snickers*
                        His full name is B. H. Liddle Hart.

                • ZombieApocalypse - wearing a heavily soiled and blood soaked ~I ♥ Bloggy~ t-shirt and riding a pale zombie horse named Pooka says:

                  Only breathers have sex (rotters just nibble to procreate), but everyone performs violent acts. :twisted:

    • Schmock says:

      prudery Fails are booooooooooooooooring!

    • maglindracia says:

      mmm, abstinence only education. theres a real fail.

  26. kv says:

    why did i see this coming a mile away?

  27. Junky says:

    The second bag had a small vibrator in it too, lol.

  28. MerQueen says:

    ♫♪ I’m pickin’ up good vibrations
    She’s giving me the excitations ♫♪

  29. MuMuMo says:

    ”Mom , I missed the plane” , well , I guess his mother passed here .

  30. Bob says:

    Friend of mine worked at a hotel. When guests left their luggage behind (and it happened more than I would think) the bags’ contents were inventoried and stored for a period of time, until they could be reclaimed.
    People take a surprising variety of things with them when they travel!!

  31. hdgh says:

    Funny. But it could be something else.

  32. ShadowTheSniperZombie C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork/makes rare sightings like bigfoot says:

    A trip around the world ;)

  33. nightshayde says:

    Did he have to pay $17 to get it back at a yard sale?

  34. bob_super says:

    Accurate caption: About half of the population doesn’t leave without theirs…

  35. NIKSEEN says:

    MUNICH AIRPORT FTW XD

  36. Avis says:

    Off Topic… So, Rooster still hasn’t been able to get his e-mail or facebook account back. And now I’ve decided to have a little fun with the creeps who hacked him. I sent him a facebook message begging for his forgiveness over some unspecified “crime”. I want to see if I get a response. I made it sound like we hadn’t communicated in a little while for good measure.

    • Jules ♂ ♪ says:

      You should tell them, that the baby is his and that you are going to get the authorities to contact his Internet Service Provider to release his address so you can send him the child support checks.

  37. Bunsen says:

    The TV Show itself is the real FAIL!

  38. Brittney says:

    Just saying that any woman who doesn’t have some sort of sex toy is lying. Any woman who doesn’t take one with her on a long trip is a very busy and or boring individual. And, anyone who assumes that married women don’t have them has never had the pleasure of kinky sex. Enough said.

    • nightshayde says:

      Wow — I’m a liar and I’m a very busy and or boring individual.
      :sad: I’m crushed!

    • ¡Great Scott! Me transmitte sursum, caledoni ▲Caution slow posts▲ says:

      Peoples sexual preferences are as different and varied as people themselves are, making broad statements like yours invalid.

      In other words, “♪Whatever gets you through the night, is alright.♫”

    • ZombieApocalypse - wearing a heavily soiled and blood soaked ~I ♥ Bloggy~ t-shirt and riding a pale zombie horse named Pooka says:

      Just saying that any woman who doesn’t have some sort of sex toy is lying missing all her fingers.

      Better?

  39. Minty Green Guy says:

    I’m going to pretend to be innocent and not know what that is.

    • ZombieApocalypse - wearing a heavily soiled and blood soaked ~I ♥ Bloggy~ t-shirt and riding a pale zombie horse named Pooka says:

      Who do you think it’s going to fool?

  40. bob says:

    possible terrorist?

  41. Porsche says:

    It’s not a Passenger Luggage FAIL! It’s an Privacy FAIL!

  42. megri says:

    i think that its not more good for me. you should try it to make batter.People take a surprising variety of things with them when they travel!!

  43. bam bam says:

    the uploader semms to be prudish

    where is the fail ?

    sex is a normal thing

    noone care about it in germany

    women are topless at the beach
    and noone look at them cause we see this everyday

    and you will probably come ( cumshot )

  44. he uploader semms to be prudish

    where is the fail ?

    sex is a normal thing

    noone care about it in germany

  45. Shipoopi says:

    What’s next, a dude getting made fun of for taking his left hand with him when he flies?

  46. Not Perfect says:

    Didn’t anyone see Fight Club? They’re going to have to detonate that suitcase.

  47. TweakFix says:

    They have to defend themself somway..

  48. Tani says:

    Well i saw that on television but i didnt notice it :D lol

  49. Ice NIne says:

    Er no. Anyting inside would actually show up as an anomaly.

    That’s the point of an x-ray.


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up