-
-
Copy & paste this:
Popular FAIL Videos
-
Recent Failures in Communications
Mick on Music FAILS: Everyone Knows Th… Mick on Music FAILS: Everyone Knows Th… Mick on Music FAILS: Everyone Knows Th… nobodeenoes on Dating Fails: So Yea Gimme a D… Frank on WIN!: Glow Juggling WIN Mick on After 12: Partying WIN: Vanqui… Bob on Ugliest Tattoos: Revenge of th… WolfmanXX on Dating Fails: So Yea Gimme a D… Mick on Dating Fails: Stephen Colbert … Mick on Dating Fails: Stephen Colbert … 
Cheezburger Company Blog
![\"Quantcast\"/](\"http://pixel.quantserve.com/pixel/p-94wNw88f65Rhk.gif?labels=MTVN%20Digital%20Tribes\")
FIRST !!!!!!!!
i want you inside me
hahaha! me next!
This posting is so crap I’m glad someone took the hit.
Proof that girls are stupid:
The one who made that didn’t take into account that need is not the same as equal.
Hit me smitty!
*Bara bum bushhhhhhhhhhhh*
Lets also not forget that the girls=evil equation is entirely based off of old addages and sayings while this is just that plus girls+sex.
(sorry texx)
1. since when do guys take time and money to keep happy? The stereotype is the opposite, guys want peace and quiet, not excess time, and guys have to spend the money during courting. So that part of the equation is false. men =/= time*money.
2. Men also do not equal sex, but the “requirement” is equivalent to the women=money statement for the “correct” equation. So we will allow it
3. if we remove the time and money statements as they make literally no sense, then we just have men=girls*sex. The rest of this statement hinges on the writer accepting that girls=evil, and that for men women=sex (which was actually kind of funny). however since this isnt supported by common sayings such as “money is the root of all evil” then its validity is based entirely on the subjective position of the writer.
So here we have a writer, presumably a woman, who accepts that girls are evil and on her own statement attributes her entire gender to nothing more than sex.
you could maybe get to men=evil^2 but even that is a stretch as it assumes that all sex is evil so we end up with men = evil*sex (which is not the same as evil sex, so not last minute grasping for straws to call us out as cheaters). Removing any non-sensical or irrelavent data (the sex part), we have men=evil=women.
so at best, this equation proves equality between men and women… but also proves that men are just a tad more clever
again… how the hell do men = time*money? unless it is again an error in perception of the writer in that men give her time and give her money… I think the problem here may be a little more deeply seated than I originally thought…..
the one on the right isn’t valid, it’s just an attempt at making the one where girls are evil less correct. What’s the stereotype on math?
Just when I thought this site tapped out the internet’s pool of original ideas.
WOW!
How totally misogynistic.
Some one going to make a scientific argument for why Jews are bad? Oh wait- That happened.
I wonder if they made shirts about that…
“How totally misogynistic.”
It’s a joke. Get over it.
I think the one on the right is possibly even more misandric…
The one on the left is a well known joke. Nothing serious about it… and the math works.
One on the right is a spiteful retort and it doesn’t even work. Apparently “thinking something else is evil” is itself evil-squared, making you evil cubed. Er, yeah. OK. Someone please explain? Or was it actually made by a very clever and subtle misogynist trying to make women look stupid and incapable of math and humour?
these shirts are so stupid who would want to buy or wear that crap
These never made sense because saying, “girls require time and money” would imply girl = time + money, not time * money. Same with the “boys equation”. But regardless, these shirts are pretty lame. It would have been cute maybe 20 years ago. >_>
Actually, “or” is the ‘+’ operator. It is seen both in logic and circuitry.
The ‘*’ operator is used with “and”.
syllogistic win
wait a minute… so that means… boys are even more girls than the girls?!
I believe the equation was something like…
Girls take time and money
Girls = time * money
Time is money
Girls = money * money or money^2
Money is the root of all evil
so… Girls = Sqrt(evil^2)
Reduce: Girls = evil
but oh well.
Actually the bible verse is “the love of money is the root of all sorts of evil,” so does that invalidate the argument??
Like it matters…. it’s kind of a lame t shirt.
The square of a root of a number isn’t that number, it’s |that number|. But I guess that’s not the only mistake here.
Isn’t taking the square root of something squared redundant?
No, it just gives you the original “something”, which is the WHOLE POINT OF THE JOKE. Lrn2/balancedequation.
Sweet, enforce sexism! Aweesoooome!
The one for women has an explanation under each equation. Apparently they think women can’t do math.
No, apparently they KNOW women can’t do math
Actually the original “guy” version had the explanations as well and was written much like the new “girl” version, just without the final line.
The symbol-based one on the left is arguably more intelligence-insulting.
Now now kids, the only reason to get offended by something like this is if you yourself believe it to be true deep down. (I’m a girl)
boys=girls*girls*girls? WTF kind of math is that supposed to be? Boys are girls^3 somehow?
Hey, everybody loves a threesome…
Is it just me or could the shirt on the right, the girls shirt be a fail all on it’s own? Sure it says “boys thing girls are evil” but does that really justify substituting girls with evil? In trying to prove that boys are evil, the shirt accepts equates girls as evil. FAIL!
Wow, I can’t type. Let’s try one more time:
Is it just me or could the girls shirt be a fail all on it’s own? It uses “boys think girls are evil” as its justification for substituting girls with evil, but still,in trying to prove that boys are evil, the shirt accepts the equation of girls as evil. FAIL!
The reason the first shirt has the “time and money” thing is because traditionally, the men pay for everything because, traditionally, women didn’t work. Thus, the argument in the second shirt makes no sense because women, traditionally, don’t invest money in a man. In fact, back in the olden days, there was a thing called a bride price, which was a payment from the man’s family to the woman’s family in order to allow the man to marry the daughter.
On another note, women do not generally pay men off regularly with other women to keep him with her. Thus, “girls” can be removed from the equation, leaving you with men require time and sex.
Second shirt’s argument is invalid.
Hey! Happy Valentines Day everyone. Wish you all to have a very sweet moment with your loved ones.
Now now kids, the only reason to get offended by something like this is if you yourself believe it to be true deep down
huh, i don’t get it. what’s an evil valentine shirt got to do with living anyway?
delete it, its crap
Can I just say what a comfort to find someone who genuinely knows what they’re discussing online. You definitely understand how to bring an issue to light and make it important. A lot more people ought to check this out and understand this side of the story. I was surprised that you are not more popular because you certainly have the gift.