<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Statistical Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/</link>
	<description>Fail and Epic Fail Pictures and Videos in one blog. For all those precious fail moments, whip out your camera and see your epic fail picture and videos here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:30:23 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Myself</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-804488</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Myself]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Feb 2010 00:13:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-804488</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[dude you fail hard. the statement is absolutely true. there IS a 50% chance that something might happen. there is also a 50% chance that nothing happens. So out of 10 times it is possible that  10 times something happens or 10 times nothing happens . all combinations are possible. AND somebody who actually took the time to make a statistic about it found out, that 9 times out of 10 something actually happens. Take this example: the chance of you getting laid a day is 50/50, out of 10 days 9 days nothing WILL happen. doesn&#039;t say it couldn&#039;t happen. but statistically speaking (if someone would actually bother to study your sexlife) chances are high nothing will happen. The possibility that something could/n&#039;t happen has nothing to do with the possibility how often it could/n&#039;t happen -&gt; two completely different things. hope that clears stuff up for you.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>dude you fail hard. the statement is absolutely true. there IS a 50% chance that something might happen. there is also a 50% chance that nothing happens. So out of 10 times it is possible that  10 times something happens or 10 times nothing happens . all combinations are possible. AND somebody who actually took the time to make a statistic about it found out, that 9 times out of 10 something actually happens. Take this example: the chance of you getting laid a day is 50/50, out of 10 days 9 days nothing WILL happen. doesn&#8217;t say it couldn&#8217;t happen. but statistically speaking (if someone would actually bother to study your sexlife) chances are high nothing will happen. The possibility that something could/n&#8217;t happen has nothing to do with the possibility how often it could/n&#8217;t happen -&gt; two completely different things. hope that clears stuff up for you.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: [:</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-785440</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[[:]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 10 Feb 2010 07:25:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-785440</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Whatt? Hahaha, how did people start talkin about poop &amp; stuff?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Whatt? Hahaha, how did people start talkin about poop &amp; stuff?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Neinna</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-732743</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Neinna]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 04:08:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-732743</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[84.342.7% of statistics are made up on the spot. OH WAIT---

*Fwoom*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>84.342.7% of statistics are made up on the spot. OH WAIT&#8212;</p>
<p>*Fwoom*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott jago</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-732729</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott jago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:18:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-732729</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott jago</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-732726</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott jago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 03:16:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-732726</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[OH OH OH OH OH!!! i love DND.. especially ADND.. chainmail was ok.. but i like the combo of gygax and the other guy.. (i forget who) with the single person being a player.. nad... yea.. im done.. my brain just sploded.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OH OH OH OH OH!!! i love DND.. especially ADND.. chainmail was ok.. but i like the combo of gygax and the other guy.. (i forget who) with the single person being a player.. nad&#8230; yea.. im done.. my brain just sploded.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott jago</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-732712</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott jago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:51:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-732712</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[in soviet russia.. you dont play with yourself in public.. public plays with themselves inside you.. LOL!!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>in soviet russia.. you dont play with yourself in public.. public plays with themselves inside you.. LOL!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott jago</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-732706</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott jago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:45:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-732706</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL!! im glad imma guy.. id kill somone.. if i was a female gamer.. ps. DND 4th.. = fail..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL!! im glad imma guy.. id kill somone.. if i was a female gamer.. ps. DND 4th.. = fail..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scott jago</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-732705</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[scott jago]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Jan 2010 02:43:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-732705</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[i appear from nowhere. and aid you in the slaying of orcs.. with my.. +4 greatsword of sexuality change.. (good thing orcs only like orcs)  GAY ORC ORGIE.. as i run away in fright..]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>i appear from nowhere. and aid you in the slaying of orcs.. with my.. +4 greatsword of sexuality change.. (good thing orcs only like orcs)  GAY ORC ORGIE.. as i run away in fright..</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Josh</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-682334</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Josh]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 18 Nov 2009 15:13:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-682334</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[What do you mean &#039;you people&#039;?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What do you mean &#8216;you people&#8217;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: mikeyb</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-677531</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[mikeyb]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Nov 2009 01:06:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-677531</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*handface*]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*handface*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jacob Pritchett</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-659597</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Jacob Pritchett]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 30 Oct 2009 04:24:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-659597</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I hate fails that make me think...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I hate fails that make me think&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jason</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-657885</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jason]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Oct 2009 22:05:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-657885</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Strictly speaking, this is totally possible. 

The first figure has to do with a single-instance-probability. Basically, any time you play with fire, you either will get burnt or you will not get burnt. 

the second figure has to do with the recording of single instances..

Think about it this way...even though you have a 50/50 chance of flipping heads on a coin, its still possible to hit heads 9 times in a row.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Strictly speaking, this is totally possible. </p>
<p>The first figure has to do with a single-instance-probability. Basically, any time you play with fire, you either will get burnt or you will not get burnt. </p>
<p>the second figure has to do with the recording of single instances..</p>
<p>Think about it this way&#8230;even though you have a 50/50 chance of flipping heads on a coin, its still possible to hit heads 9 times in a row.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Howie13</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-643586</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Howie13]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 18 Oct 2009 06:33:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-643586</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This sounds like a saying I used and heard a lot in the navy, 50/50 90. It means given a fifty fifty choice the wrong choice will be made 90% of the time]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This sounds like a saying I used and heard a lot in the navy, 50/50 90. It means given a fifty fifty choice the wrong choice will be made 90% of the time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Fang</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-640694</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Fang]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Oct 2009 17:05:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-640694</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Um, no, win. Not in a news article, perhaps; that&#039;s a bit weird, but this is quite a common sentiment to refer to the fact that a lot of statistics don&#039;t work out the way you would expect them to.

Another one is &quot;million to one chances occur 9 times out of 10&quot;]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Um, no, win. Not in a news article, perhaps; that&#8217;s a bit weird, but this is quite a common sentiment to refer to the fact that a lot of statistics don&#8217;t work out the way you would expect them to.</p>
<p>Another one is &#8220;million to one chances occur 9 times out of 10&#8243;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: RaNDM G</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-636659</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[RaNDM G]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:53:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-636659</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It&#039;s good to know there&#039;s at least 1 in every 6,789,906,834 people on this planet who actually cares about statistics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s good to know there&#8217;s at least 1 in every 6,789,906,834 people on this planet who actually cares about statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C2k</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-636644</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:08:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-636644</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[It doesn&#039;t take a rocket scientist to realize they completely contradict themselves. First they say a 50% chance, then they say 9/10, or for those 4 out of 3 ppl bad with fractions, is 90%. And those of us who passed pre algebra know that 50% does not equal 90%. This fails 10 times out of 9. Its a fail and a half.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It doesn&#8217;t take a rocket scientist to realize they completely contradict themselves. First they say a 50% chance, then they say 9/10, or for those 4 out of 3 ppl bad with fractions, is 90%. And those of us who passed pre algebra know that 50% does not equal 90%. This fails 10 times out of 9. Its a fail and a half.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: C2k</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-636643</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[C2k]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 12 Oct 2009 01:02:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-636643</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[60% of the time, it works every time.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>60% of the time, it works every time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Andrew</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-636409</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Andrew]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 17:07:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-636409</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You people confuse me...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You people confuse me&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: gdot</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-636379</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[gdot]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Oct 2009 16:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-636379</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[hahah good, i am not going crazy thinking its right.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hahah good, i am not going crazy thinking its right.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Just_spiffy</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-635837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Just_spiffy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 17:43:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-635837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Well, you know what they say. Every 4 out of 3 people have trouble with fractions...]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well, you know what they say. Every 4 out of 3 people have trouble with fractions&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-635332</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 Oct 2009 03:05:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-635332</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Mhmm, ok.  Sure.

I bet you&#039;re so smart.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mhmm, ok.  Sure.</p>
<p>I bet you&#8217;re so smart.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mattie</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-634701</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Mattie]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 18:04:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-634701</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, that&#039;s not necessarily wrong. There are 2 possible outcomes when &quot;playing with fire&quot; - something goes wrong or it doesn&#039;t... aka a 50/50 chance of something going wrong. 
The next thing he is saying is that in actuality 9 out of 10 times it actually does go wrong.

Just like saying if you flip a coin there&#039;s a 50/50 chance of getting heads, but then when you actually put that to the test its possible that 9 times out of 10 you get heads.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, that&#8217;s not necessarily wrong. There are 2 possible outcomes when &#8220;playing with fire&#8221; &#8211; something goes wrong or it doesn&#8217;t&#8230; aka a 50/50 chance of something going wrong.<br />
The next thing he is saying is that in actuality 9 out of 10 times it actually does go wrong.</p>
<p>Just like saying if you flip a coin there&#8217;s a 50/50 chance of getting heads, but then when you actually put that to the test its possible that 9 times out of 10 you get heads.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Caghs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-634382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Caghs]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 14:54:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-634382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Okies, I was wondering about that.  I&#039;m mathematically challenged, so I wondered whether it was just my lack of understanding, but if I flip a coin, it has a 50/50 chance of coming up heads.

I flip that coin ten times, it could come up tails once, and heads the rest.

Therefore, it had a 50/50 chance of coming up heads, and nine times out of ten it did!

I feel better now that I know it&#039;s not just me :)]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okies, I was wondering about that.  I&#8217;m mathematically challenged, so I wondered whether it was just my lack of understanding, but if I flip a coin, it has a 50/50 chance of coming up heads.</p>
<p>I flip that coin ten times, it could come up tails once, and heads the rest.</p>
<p>Therefore, it had a 50/50 chance of coming up heads, and nine times out of ten it did!</p>
<p>I feel better now that I know it&#8217;s not just me <img src='http://s0.wp.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_smile.gif' alt=':)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladiator763</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633941</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gladiator763]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:06:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633941</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[The only way you can get pregnant on abstinence is artificial insemination. If you screw before &quot;I do&quot;, then you run that risk.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only way you can get pregnant on abstinence is artificial insemination. If you screw before &#8220;I do&#8221;, then you run that risk.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladiator763</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633940</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gladiator763]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:04:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633940</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thank you for being the voice of reason, Bah.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thank you for being the voice of reason, Bah.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladiator763</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633939</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gladiator763]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:01:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633939</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[WND is a WIN, but these stats are still a FAIL.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>WND is a WIN, but these stats are still a FAIL.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gladiator763</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633938</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gladiator763]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 04:00:54 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633938</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Heya, Boo-Boo? Are there people here with better pic-a-nic baskets than Yogi Berra?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Heya, Boo-Boo? Are there people here with better pic-a-nic baskets than Yogi Berra?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633935</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 03:56:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633935</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, I do understand.  You do not.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I do understand.  You do not.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633896</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 01:43:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633896</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you actually were not completely moronic, you&#039;d understand.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you actually were not completely moronic, you&#8217;d understand.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earthlingmike</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633851</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[earthlingmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:04:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633851</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Like how with abstinence, there is a zero chance of getting pregnant, but that doesn&#039;t always work.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Like how with abstinence, there is a zero chance of getting pregnant, but that doesn&#8217;t always work.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: earthlingmike</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633850</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[earthlingmike]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 09 Oct 2009 00:01:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633850</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[More likely private Christian school.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More likely private Christian school.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Snow_Crash</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633837</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Snow_Crash]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 23:43:06 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633837</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Scientists have determined that million to one chances happen nine times out of ten.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Scientists have determined that million to one chances happen nine times out of ten.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: technicolor</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633294</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[technicolor]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:15:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633294</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[*Feels unwanted*
*Cries a bit*
What&#039;s that smell?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*Feels unwanted*<br />
*Cries a bit*<br />
What&#8217;s that smell?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ron</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633265</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Ron]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 17:01:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633265</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dude everyone knows chicks don&#039;t fart, poop, or burp.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dude everyone knows chicks don&#8217;t fart, poop, or burp.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633142</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:48:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633142</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Why is that?  Someone who has written or read an article on abstinence can&#039;t get knocked up?

And were there two knocked up? I see a plural.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Why is that?  Someone who has written or read an article on abstinence can&#8217;t get knocked up?</p>
<p>And were there two knocked up? I see a plural.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633140</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:46:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633140</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Yes, I&#039;m sure the person who wrote the above article was also responsible for that.  Makes sense.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I&#8217;m sure the person who wrote the above article was also responsible for that.  Makes sense.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633138</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:43:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633138</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[If you actually understand English, you would understand that it is still a fail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If you actually understand English, you would understand that it is still a fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633136</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633136</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Actually, you are stupid.  It is true that you could win the lottery 9 times out of ten, at a 50/50 chance. However, that is not analogous to what she said.  The 9/10 is not based on any data, not based on a specific 10 attempts, it is a generalization.  She generalizes that something bad DOES happen 9/10 times, not that she tried it and it DID happen 9/10 times.  Therefore, she posits both a 50% chance and then a 90% chance in the same sentence.  Therefore, fail.

To use your analogy more accurately, it&#039;s as if she said that there is a lottery with a 50/50 chance, and everyone who plays always wins the lottery 9 times out of 10.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, you are stupid.  It is true that you could win the lottery 9 times out of ten, at a 50/50 chance. However, that is not analogous to what she said.  The 9/10 is not based on any data, not based on a specific 10 attempts, it is a generalization.  She generalizes that something bad DOES happen 9/10 times, not that she tried it and it DID happen 9/10 times.  Therefore, she posits both a 50% chance and then a 90% chance in the same sentence.  Therefore, fail.</p>
<p>To use your analogy more accurately, it&#8217;s as if she said that there is a lottery with a 50/50 chance, and everyone who plays always wins the lottery 9 times out of 10.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: qbert</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633119</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[qbert]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:25:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633119</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Thousand to one chances happen nine out of ten times!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thousand to one chances happen nine out of ten times!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: KR</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-633100</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[KR]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 14:12:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-633100</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[But that&#039;s not what it says.  Saying there are two outcomes is not the same as a 50/50 chance.  Attempting to explain a statistics understanding fail fail.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>But that&#8217;s not what it says.  Saying there are two outcomes is not the same as a 50/50 chance.  Attempting to explain a statistics understanding fail fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TP Fan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632778</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[TP Fan]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 08:52:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632778</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Not a fail, this is totally true]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not a fail, this is totally true</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Mysterious Mr. Rius</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632675</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[The Mysterious Mr. Rius]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:53:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632675</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[That was my first thought too. But many people don&#039;t understand that... and some of them vote.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That was my first thought too. But many people don&#8217;t understand that&#8230; and some of them vote.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Daniel</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632668</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Daniel]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 03:35:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632668</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Bwhahahahahahaha!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bwhahahahahahaha!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jdkchem</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632537</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[jdkchem]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 01:32:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632537</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sounds more like something Yogi Berra would have said.  On the other hand there is nothing technically wrong with the statement if you actually understand probability and statistics.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sounds more like something Yogi Berra would have said.  On the other hand there is nothing technically wrong with the statement if you actually understand probability and statistics.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gorgon Medusa</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632499</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Gorgon Medusa]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Oct 2009 00:48:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632499</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Your mother, she&#039;s an heiress
Owns a block in St John&#039;s Wood.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Your mother, she&#8217;s an heiress<br />
Owns a block in St John&#8217;s Wood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: olo</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632465</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[olo]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:56:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632465</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Is it a paradox?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it a paradox?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Me</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632457</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Me]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:48:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632457</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You realize this is in correspondence with Murphy&#039;s law, right?

Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong, etc., etc.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You realize this is in correspondence with Murphy&#8217;s law, right?</p>
<p>Anything that can go wrong, will go wrong, etc., etc.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: killyou420</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632454</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[killyou420]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 23:45:08 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632454</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Dont you love when people completly make up figures to prove their point? im not even going to touch on her horrible math skills]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dont you love when people completly make up figures to prove their point? im not even going to touch on her horrible math skills</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: reminisent loser</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632399</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[reminisent loser]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:53:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632399</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Im pretty sure its .02 dollars.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Im pretty sure its .02 dollars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Bwggy</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/10/07/statistical-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-632382</link>
		<dc:creator><![CDATA[Bwggy]]></dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Oct 2009 22:40:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=26399#comment-632382</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Sixty percent of the time it works every time]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sixty percent of the time it works every time</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

