Comments on: Women Only Sign Fail http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/ Fail and Epic Fail Pictures and Videos in one blog. For all those precious fail moments, whip out your camera and see your epic fail picture and videos here. Sun, 21 Mar 2010 13:15:48 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: Jack http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-725171 Jack Thu, 24 Dec 2009 16:15:10 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-725171 I know the point of the joke was that the stock picture didn't work with the text, but I have to remark on the double standard here. No men allowed? Whatever. No women allowed? Sexist! It's one thing when the event is exclusively for females, such as a pregnancy test or something, but other than that, gender discrimination isn't okay. (And now that I know even men can get breast cancer, that list of okay forms of discrimination is getting shorter and shorter.) I know the point of the joke was that the stock picture didn’t work with the text, but I have to remark on the double standard here. No men allowed? Whatever. No women allowed? Sexist! It’s one thing when the event is exclusively for females, such as a pregnancy test or something, but other than that, gender discrimination isn’t okay. (And now that I know even men can get breast cancer, that list of okay forms of discrimination is getting shorter and shorter.)

]]> By: Suppress http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-716986 Suppress Fri, 18 Dec 2009 09:31:43 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-716986 hah lolll hah lolll

]]> By: zac299 http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-673787 zac299 Wed, 11 Nov 2009 15:53:21 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-673787 man... them is some flat-chested women... man… them is some flat-chested women…

]]> By: SailorAlphaCentauri http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-647228 SailorAlphaCentauri Wed, 21 Oct 2009 05:00:43 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-647228 ...and what I meant about "that's what gets me" is that the multiple males in the image should have been a tip-off as to how inappropriate the image is for the ad. …and what I meant about “that’s what gets me” is that the multiple males in the image should have been a tip-off as to how inappropriate the image is for the ad.

]]> By: SailorAlphaCentauri http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-647227 SailorAlphaCentauri Wed, 21 Oct 2009 04:59:26 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-647227 There are two men in this picture, and that's what gets me. I used to work with people who would do something like this; use an image that contradicts their message, but insist that the message will outweigh the photo and not change it. It's funny, but reminds me of how much I hate my old co-workers at the same time. There are two men in this picture, and that’s what gets me. I used to work with people who would do something like this; use an image that contradicts their message, but insist that the message will outweigh the photo and not change it. It’s funny, but reminds me of how much I hate my old co-workers at the same time.

]]> By: ejan http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-643481 ejan Sun, 18 Oct 2009 01:59:34 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-643481 No, I think this is a WIN for that man. No, I think this is a WIN for that man.

]]> By: SeeTheMan http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-626736 SeeTheMan Fri, 02 Oct 2009 00:38:35 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-626736 dude u see a man right there in the picture Picture FAIL dude u see a man right there in the picture Picture FAIL

]]> By: wtf http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-625342 wtf Thu, 01 Oct 2009 02:21:54 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-625342 extreamly sexist, people would freak out if there was anything that was men only extreamly sexist, people would freak out if there was anything that was men only

]]> By: jennifer http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-625092 jennifer Wed, 30 Sep 2009 22:13:56 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-625092 She forgot to shave. She forgot to shave.

]]> By: Interneta pieslēgums http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-621390 Interneta pieslēgums Mon, 28 Sep 2009 14:33:26 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-621390 5K o_o 5K o_o

]]> By: Ruukasu http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-621072 Ruukasu Mon, 28 Sep 2009 07:27:20 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-621072 This will probably have Ms. Swan say, "she look-a-like a man." This will probably have Ms. Swan say, “she look-a-like a man.”

]]> By: BOB http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-620864 BOB Sun, 27 Sep 2009 21:49:39 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-620864 THERE ARE TWO PPLZ!!!!!! THERE ARE TWO PPLZ!!!!!!

]]> By: Jorkey http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-620631 Jorkey Sun, 27 Sep 2009 15:59:52 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-620631 HAHA! Women running, epic fail! HAHA! Women running, epic fail!

]]> By: Quasi http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-620542 Quasi Sun, 27 Sep 2009 13:48:30 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-620542 Shemale!!1 Shemale!!1

]]> By: Addy Positas http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-620173 Addy Positas Sun, 27 Sep 2009 01:30:46 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-620173 Maybe "he" is just a lesbian. Maybe “he” is just a lesbian.

]]> By: Person http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-620104 Person Sun, 27 Sep 2009 00:30:25 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-620104 Are we sure this isn't a win for the guys? Are we sure this isn’t a win for the guys?

]]> By: ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619993 ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork Sat, 26 Sep 2009 22:28:24 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619993 Mog Mog

]]> By: electricmastro http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619731 electricmastro Sat, 26 Sep 2009 17:13:14 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619731 I bet those people have had sex changes. I bet those people have had sex changes.

]]> By: Troy http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619580 Troy Sat, 26 Sep 2009 14:08:41 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619580 Clog Clog

]]> By: Ally x http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619516 Ally x Sat, 26 Sep 2009 10:27:40 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619516 Sexist b Sexist b

]]> By: MRN ♂ http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619507 MRN ♂ Sat, 26 Sep 2009 08:24:03 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619507 I know I am hours late in replying to this, but it is SO TRUE that I am declaring it the retail workers' equivalent of The First Law of Thermodynamics!! I know I am hours late in replying to this, but it is SO TRUE that I am declaring it the retail workers’ equivalent of The First Law of Thermodynamics!!

]]> By: boredchika http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619496 boredchika Sat, 26 Sep 2009 06:54:02 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619496 WIN!! WIN!!

]]> By: Peter Della Penna http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619483 Peter Della Penna Sat, 26 Sep 2009 05:45:15 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619483 this poster was definitely designed by a Creighton graduate. this poster was definitely designed by a Creighton graduate.

]]> By: chango http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619415 chango Sat, 26 Sep 2009 03:46:27 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619415 Women doing something with out men... I give it five minutes Women doing something with out men… I give it five minutes

]]> By: arimareiji http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619364 arimareiji Sat, 26 Sep 2009 02:27:12 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619364 That part I can actually understand... anyone who's worked retail can attest that people think obviously-posted signs apply to everyone EXCEPT them. That part I can actually understand… anyone who’s worked retail can attest that people think obviously-posted signs apply to everyone EXCEPT them.

]]> By: pootpoot http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619298 pootpoot Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:45:35 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619298 I like the clarification (in parentheses) of the very cryptic, hard to grasp first sentence. FOR WOMEN ONLY "Huh? What's that sposed to mean? This is for women, but nobody else? Does that mean no men?" THAT'S RIGHT, NO MEN ALLOWED. "Ah, I almost thought so." I like the clarification (in parentheses) of the very cryptic, hard to grasp first sentence.

FOR WOMEN ONLY

“Huh? What’s that sposed to mean? This is for women, but nobody else? Does that mean no men?”

THAT’S RIGHT, NO MEN ALLOWED.

“Ah, I almost thought so.”

]]> By: anonyhippotamous http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619269 anonyhippotamous Sat, 26 Sep 2009 00:19:05 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619269 Nah, the fail is that there are two dudes in the picture on the poster (though it's not that easy to see here) Nah, the fail is that there are two dudes in the picture on the poster (though it’s not that easy to see here)

]]> By: ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619170 ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:47:35 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619170 That's what she said ;) *gets shocked* That’s what she said ;)
*gets shocked*

]]> By: ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619160 ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:38:51 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619160 I'm just being happy. I’m just being happy.

]]> By: ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619159 ShadowTheSniper C.C.C./Head of the Janitors' Union/Co-owner of ZombieTrollNetwork Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:37:56 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619159 Blog Blog

]]> By: Capitán General Alamasy del ejército de la República Independiente de Mi Casa http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619141 Capitán General Alamasy del ejército de la República Independiente de Mi Casa Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:08:34 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619141 They can't. They can’t.

]]> By: lucas http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619136 lucas Fri, 25 Sep 2009 21:03:48 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619136 That's not sexist at all >_> That’s not sexist at all >_>

]]> By: wowaname http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619062 wowaname Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:30:50 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619062 For some reason, recently I have been seeing a messed up page style (on this page it is normal, but on the homepage it's all deformed and crappy). Any comments? For some reason, recently I have been seeing a messed up page style (on this page it is normal, but on the homepage it’s all deformed and crappy). Any comments?

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619054 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:24:15 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619054 some like it with a bot some like it with a bot

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619053 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:23:32 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619053 a man in tights gives me the frights a man in tights
gives me the frights

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619052 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:22:45 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619052 only if they bring their calculators only if they bring their calculators

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619051 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:21:51 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619051 that's okay, some men don't either. that’s okay, some men don’t either.

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619050 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:21:27 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619050 snog snog

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619049 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:21:08 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619049 then you get to go in for another sex change. then you get to go in for another sex change.

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619046 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:20:20 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619046 their bodies? their bodies?

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619045 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:19:54 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619045 woe is the he who is slower than she woe is the he who is slower than she

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619041 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:18:56 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619041 he she kitchee coo? he she kitchee coo?

]]> By: sauer kraut http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619040 sauer kraut Fri, 25 Sep 2009 19:17:41 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619040 some women need to shave more often than others some women need to shave more often than others

]]> By: Carz http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619022 Carz Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:57:24 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619022 Oh, now I'm a woman? Funny. Oh, now I’m a woman? Funny.

]]> By: Roogie http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-619017 Roogie Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:53:45 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-619017 That's sexism! That’s sexism!

]]> By: Sagaz http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-618992 Sagaz Fri, 25 Sep 2009 18:33:22 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-618992 that man is a under cover woman that man is a under cover woman

]]> By: 5 eagles/5finches/1fox/6cats/1vole/owl C.C.C. http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-618883 5 eagles/5finches/1fox/6cats/1vole/owl C.C.C. Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:03:09 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-618883 We do brother LOL. Are you a Quaker? not trying to be rude or offensive ok. We do brother LOL. Are you a Quaker? not trying to be rude or offensive ok.

]]> By: 5 eagles/5finches/1fox/6cats/1vole/owl C.C.C. http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-618877 5 eagles/5finches/1fox/6cats/1vole/owl C.C.C. Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:01:47 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-618877 I got a vole from K@tcf. Now Sara J might have eaten it by now? I got a vole from K@tcf. Now Sara J might have eaten it by now?

]]> By: 5 eagles/5finches/1fox/6cats/1vole/owl C.C.C. http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-618872 5 eagles/5finches/1fox/6cats/1vole/owl C.C.C. Fri, 25 Sep 2009 17:00:42 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-618872 Halifax did and he took my spiders. Halifax did and he took my spiders.

]]> By: MommaC http://failblog.org/2009/09/25/women-only-sign-fail/#comment-618828 MommaC Fri, 25 Sep 2009 16:03:24 +0000 http://failblog.org/?p=25404#comment-618828 Dude looks like a lady (there are more than one in that picture too) Dude looks like a lady (there are more than one in that picture too)

]]>