Basically, it’s the theory that mass can be converted into energy and vice-versa. Rather interesting concept, as is his Theory of Relativity, but it’ll be a few years before I can understand the mathematics behind the his full theory of relativity and such…
…an allegory that has long been a fixture and reminder in Western literature and art. The allegory depicts a vessel populated by human inhabitants who are deranged, frivolous, or oblivious, passengers aboard a ship without a pilot, and seemingly ignorant of their own direction. ~ Wikipedia
I’m not sure if this has any influence, but there is a College around this area that uses this as a marketing ploy. Education = Montgomery County Community College
Must be a very “Special” school. Even the picture of a molecule model is a fail. Stupid electrons being on the same orbit, smashing into each other, and making nuclear energy.
It’s me! L*B! I’m having a little trouble today because of that “No cats on the internet” thing. A half-assed rescue mission has been, um, mounted over on ICHC.
Looks photoshopped to me. The fonts are the same between the adding picture and the E=MC^3. So if you compare the 3 from the 1+2=3 and the superscript 3 from E=MC^3, you see that they are not the same, as the one from 1+2=3 clearly has a fatter bottom. Not to mention it’s really easy to turn a 2 into a 3 with photoshop. Therefore, this picture is PHOTOSHOPPED.
Well, it all depends on the definition of E, M and C, after all…
(and on a side note, the mass-energy-equivalency E=mc² is only an approximation of the real equation, which is quite a bit more complicated)
lol, the entire surface of the world would have been obliterated when hiroshima was bombed in 1945 if e=mc^3. twice. not to mention the lateral damage. imagine if e really equaled mc^3 but einstein thought it was mc^2. that would suck.
There is a classic Doctor Who episode featuring Jon Pertwee as the doctor where the Master explains that in temporal physics, E=Mc^3 is in fact correct.
E=MC3 is actually correct. When Einstein first used this theory in the Manhattan project, he underestimated the power and damage it could do. Anyways, it’s “Energy=Mass x Constant cubed”.
This the full explanation of my post from 14 July 2010 at 3:48pm
The Truth about E=MC2, Creation and The Big Bang Theory commonly explained.
When I was still a teenager, in my fourteens, my father called me to his watch-making workshop, sat me down on the top of his lap swinging to the left and to the right along with the tick-tack’s sound of the grandfather clock’s pendulum coming from the furthest corner of the room, he said: “Close your eyes my son and imagine, just imagine”, “Imagine what?” I said, “Imagine the world. Imagine the whole universe” he said calmly “That would be difficult” I replied, But when he pushed me out off of this earthly environment view into Space, helping me to create and build another view about surrounding me cosmos by adding into the imagined picture every part of the existing visible and invisible world; all existing planets, suns, moons, comets, stars, pulsars, quasars, galaxies and all possible imaginable objects of the all existing space between here and there, moving me away from the Solar system, further and further away, passing by all those visible objects and other, he ended me up somewhere where I have just passed the last, or I’d rather say the first star dust, somewhere a few …illiard light years away from our planet Earth, somewhere where I ended up in a deep-deep dark matter drifting away further and further somewhere where I could not see anything, somewhere where I could not hear anything, somewhere where I did not feel anything or any motion. There was a silence, just motionless silence, nothing else but darkness and silence. Inertia. Total inertia.
He kept me within this motionless stage for some time when with the same calm voice he asked the first question: ‘Imagine it? Are you?’ ‘Yes’, I nodded, ‘Now my son’ he simply said, ‘Draw a straight line right across this image of yours, divide it into two pieces, into two halves. Not equal ones! There is nothing like equal halves existing in the entire universe. There is no single particle equal with another… not to mention about a half of the universe. Put one of the cut halves aside and the other half divide in the same manner into two (halves). Continue. Continue cutting remaining halves until it become so small that you have to use a magnifying glass to continue. Continue. Then when it becomes so small again that you have to use a microscope to continue, continue. Continue cutting until you have to use the most powerful electronic microscope on earth to continue. Continue. Continue until you have to only use the most powerful imaginary microscope to continue. Continue’, he said. Then he asked: ‘When or will you ever be able to cut “the last half”? If anything like that “the last half” exist? There will be always a remaining half ready to be cut and divided into two indefinitely’, he added.
‘For some time the world of science is discovering what metaphysical and spiritual teachers have known for centuries. The physical world is not really composed of any matter at all; the basic component of it is a force or essence, which is called energy. Things appear to be solid and separate from each other where our physical senses normally perceive them. While on the atomic and subatomic level, a solid matter is a cluster of small particles. Particles within particle called sub-particles. Bosons, which are assumed to be massless. They were detected by high-energy experiments at the CERN laboratories in 1983. Weinberg, Salam, and Glashow shared the 1979 Nobel Prize for physics for their model, protons, and eventually photons which turn out to be just pure energy’, they said.
The speed of light may be the only constant in the universe. Everything else changes! Mr. Einstein observed that matter could be converted into energy just as energy was converted into matter (and anti-matter) when the universe was created. If everything changes, so the speed of light, too, is changeable.
As it was in 1989 scientists proposed this theory that there is no single sub-particle equal with another sub-particle in the entire universe, ‘Let’s apply this theory to an equation. Let’s try it on the equation of: E=MC2 ‘, he said.
An equation is a mathematical statement, expressed in symbols, that two things are the same (or equivalent). Equations are written with an equal sign ‘=’. Equations are often used to state the equality of two expressions containing one or more variables.
An equation contains left & right side.
When the left side of the equation is ‘E’ – one particle
the right side of the equation is ‘MC2’ – another particle,
logically speaking;
one particle = another particle
Above equation is untrue.
one sub-particle ≠ another sub-particle
Above equation might be or is true.
When the left side of equation is not equal ‘≠’ with the right side, then
E = MC2
Above equation is untrue,
Because and especially that there is a progress; power 2, then
E ≠ MC2
Above equation might be or is true.
When the left side is not equal with the right side of equation it must be then
smaller or greater, > or <.
Then the left side can be or is only < (smaller) because the progress is on the right side.
E < MC2
When variable mass symbol M is replaced by photon symbol Φ
E < ΦC2
Above equation might be or is true,
When the power ‘2’ is replaced by power to ‘3, 4, 5, 6, 7’…etc. or ‘∞’ (to infinity) then the left side of the equation is definitely not equal with the right side because there is even greater progress, then
E < ΦC∞ , then
e < ΦC∞.
‘e is a perfect half, rest of it is an illusion’, look at it he said,
‘all it is illusion’.
‘There are still some who believe that the speed of light may be the only constant in the whole universe, everything else changes. If everything changes so the speed of light does. Everything is energy. Energy is everything. Everything is a light/photon in the infinite speed of light’.
Einstein's statement that 'the distinction between past, present, and future is only an illusion' comes from a letter he wrote to the family of his lifelong friend Michele Besso on 21 March 1955, Einstein Archive, 7-245, published in The Quotable Einstein (Princeton University Press, 1996), p.61.
The Big Bang Theory commonly explained.
The first thing which came to my mind to explain my father's observation to a layman is the sequence of the Russian Doll:
KEEP IT OPENING TO INFINITY. http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka_doll.
no Einstein wrote that
Got the math one right, at least (in non-Verizonion Mathematics).
What? You’re not into cubism?
hhmmm… there’s circular reasoning in there somewhere. …
I excel at non-linear thinking.
ooooo, nice lateral
^^ getting your side-kicks
|\¯¯\| |¯¯|`,|__|Retry.
|\¯¯\| |¯¯|
`,|__|
I used the <code> tag. Am I wrong on this?
Let’s try <pre>
λ = 1 − c
μ = c − a − b
ν = a − b. λ = 1 − c
μ = c − a − b
ν = a − b.
rs = 1- 6∑D2
——-
n (n2-1)
rs = 1- 6 x 14166.5
——————
60x(60²-1) = 60x 3599
The combination of the Einstein and Pythagoras discoveries:
E = mc² = m ( a² + b²)
Now you’re going off on a tangent.
Sorry, I didn’t mean to be obtuse.
Let’s not take this to an acute level here!
*steps back*
you have to be such a square!
To bad most of the people don’t know what the Mass–Energy Equivalence is.
Poor Albert Einstein…
I do, i do!! but I can’t do the math. I understand the thorum….. don’t ask me to apply anything. lol!!
What’s another word for thorum?
Don’t ask you to apply anything? There go almost half my fantasies.
damn it!! I lost my ‘e’ s….. theorem… and stumbled on a ‘u’. grrrrr. pass the bukkit, please.
Not to worry – we lost the Women of Hawtness fail altogether!!
Basically, it’s the theory that mass can be converted into energy and vice-versa. Rather interesting concept, as is his Theory of Relativity, but it’ll be a few years before I can understand the mathematics behind the his full theory of relativity and such…
THAT IS SUCH A FAIL 1+2 doesnt equal 3!!!
For god’s sake, Einstein did NOT make his his theory based on Euclidian Geometry, not to talk about the triangle.
So c does not represent the hypotensue. Or anything in the Euclidean Plane, tbh.
Of course not! We all know that! C in this equation represents a musical scale with no sharps or flats.
there may be some truth to that…
Fail at equations… PRICELESS!
Oh, I remember now, Braque’s Constant!
*constantly draws an aphasic picture of Broca’s Area*
‘E’ equals ‘M C’ Hammer.
what about space and hammer time?
I don’t know about the hammer time but the space is in his pants.
*can’t touch that*
*snork*
*pushes glasses back*
*raises left eyebrow*
*touches it*
*giggles*
*skips away*
I’m sure there is time for hammering in his pants too.
you understand the gravity of the experience?
9.81m/s
yes, but if Ar=Q, what does M equal?
*shrugs*
Surely that is Mom?
M is for Mookie. (that’s good enough for me)
c is pretty fast
si
if the wookie is named chewbaca, what is the name of that mookie?
loubesos
chembaca?
Thats right!
If AR=Q then M= MURDER for AR meaning Assault Rifle.
Fail. 9.81 m/s^2
I’ll bet you a million dollars that Einstein most certainly did not write that. =)
einstein wrote e=mc2
What? I Thought MC Square wrote this ^^
Guess it’s not rocket science.
Rocket scientists do it with a blast at your pad. They go deeper and will put you into orbit.
Oops. That wasn’t directed at you MRN! Just the generic “you”.
*stops looking for a rocket scientist*
Darn! I was hoping it was directed at me.
*pouts*
You have to be careful. After the first 3 stages, they insist on reentry.
What would bother me is that they try it on monkeys first.
Are you counting on something?
What, are these spacers now?
counting down to someone Saying something
“Something.”
Yes. Yes they are. I mean –
Never take a dog on the space shuttle.
On re-entry they’re liable to stick their head out the window and their face will burn off.
*snork*
cough
Houston, we have a problem.
*repairs dog with duck tape*
He is qwacking up on re-entry.
We’ll send you the bill.
I hope he is not too (qu)ill.
Don’t worry – the pup has AFLACK.
*quietly removes superfluous ‘K’ and tosses it in the pond*
I’m counting on that!
Y’know, if you don’t follow the nesting properly when you read these comments…
… you might think I’m counting on them trying it on monkeys first? Disturbing thought.
*shudders*
*squeeze*
Roll out the barrels!
I tried that up there. ^^ The monkeys get mad at me.
…and I’m still trying to find my Blonde on Blonde CD to satisfy my self-imposed earworm from that thread.
Too late, I’m already enjoying the ride.
sally?
Mustang?
ride!
… captain, ride, upon your mystery ship
… of fools
It’s nucular.
It ain’t rocket surgery.
Jeez, rocket science? Piece of cake. Fire comes out of bottom of rocket, Newton says the rocket must go up. Rocket likes Newton, rocket goes up.
Rocket maths? Now THAT’S the hard stuff
olol
THIRD!
Damnit!
new rapper
thanks for your 50 cents
that’s just 50 cent … proper grammar would demean his street cred!
sounds somehow fiddy’ing
Since c is just a constant, it does work for some value of c.
(speed of light to the 2/3 power)
2 is company, 3′s a crowd.
reverser your log and the answer you might snog
*ahem 3 and a bit hours of sleep is not good for you!
Who says he even went to bed? Maybe he’s just on his 2nd bottle of Chenin Blanc!
It comes in bottles too?
Yes, not just vats or bukkits!
roll out the barrel, we’ll have a barrel of fun. …
I tried that, but the monkeys got mad at me.
That is when you spank the organ grinder!
That depends on who the organ grinder is.
monkeys are best left in the socks
*lonesome organ grinder cries*
♪ Don’t cry for me, Organ Grinder,
The truth is, I’ll always [fill in the Blanc] for you.
Just don’t interrupt
Me drinkin’ from my broken cup
there ya go again…
drinking solo
Hans Drinker?
*Fills in Blanc*
Chenin!
Vouvray!
now, that brings up an interesting visual
Wait, are we saying that if I take the cube of c to the 2/3 power I don’t get c squared?
Yes you do!
Thank you!
*pours another*
^ consumes mass quantities
I’m surprised he has enough energy.
I’m surprised I can still c.
MC is gonna get Hammered
E/C3 = mass quantity. sure.
so this is not right then?
you are right either way
We should ask Judy about this stuff.
*head esplodes*
(i)
R= relative area X relative duration X frequency
*boom*
*giggles!*
The pressure is getting to me… time to Boyle some water.
Aaaand boom goes the dynamite!
yay science
At least they got the sum on the left right.
If left is not right then right is the only thing that’s left right?
Looks like E got a raise.
E-raise that from your memory!
stay in your own cubicle!
i am stupid for not knowing what’s wrong with the pic?
(like i dont know what you’re gonna answer…)
it’s the backpack that’s the fail, hope that helps
Your grammar makes me die a little inside.
the equation is e=mc2
I’m not sure if this has any influence, but there is a College around this area that uses this as a marketing ploy. Education = Montgomery County Community College
oh, clickie web address is actually mc3.edu
Or the Eurasian Marketing Concept for Culture and Cooperation. (clickie)
*squeeeeze!*
ahhh, lol! *squeeze*
Heh! They’re from Germany!
*blames Arthur*
oh, HACC
Because MC cubed is much better than MC Squared
MC is gonna hammer you for that comment
Suddenly, I feel a lot more energetic!
I guess they’re not cut out for rocket surgery.
Pliers!
Don’t forcep me, bro!
Must be a very “Special” school. Even the picture of a molecule model is a fail. Stupid electrons being on the same orbit, smashing into each other, and making nuclear energy.
er uhm, atom yeah…
It’s funny because….
…because…
I’ll show myself out. Thank you for everything.
Someone call The Moomin!!!
But…but…but he didn’t do it right! He didn’t state the astoundingly obvious!
…The Moomin is going to be so disappointed…
Oh great, now I’m not going to be able to understand the FAIL.
*squeeze*
Nooooooooooo!
*dives and grabs ankles*
Your deadpan delivery rivals Jack Dee!
“There is not the slightest indication that energy will ever be obtainable from the atom.”
-Albert Einstein, 1932
Only two things are infinite, the universe and human stupidity, and I’m not sure about the former.
-Albert Einstein
The Button-Combo Theory
→ + ↓ + ↘ + PUNCH =
SHORYUKEN!
2D VS 3D Theory
*Takes one step to the right and watches wolfs attack miss*
*Casually walks up to wolf and beats him to death with a Game Genie*
A perfection of means, and confusion of aims, seems to be our main problem.
~Albert Einstein
Science just got 1 1/2 times more X-TREME!
x-treme science… not just for sarah palin anymore
This looks like a job for the Zula Patrol!
E=MCHammer
Those are some high energy kids.
E=mp3
im posting from my wii haha
But it didn’t go to Twitter like it should have.
One of five characters are correct… that’s 80%. Good enough for a B in the public school system.
This fail is bombdiggity good.
^ gone fission
You spend your half life doing that, have you actually caught anything yet?
I caught up with dilly for dinner that one timeCan’t … I’m all out of energy.
Glowing!
Are you new? Or maybe you’re a smurf with a mask?
I’m a mask without a smurf. Or anything else, for that matter.
Now I’m really confused. Who are all these people? How did I get here? This is not my beautiful house!
It’s me! L*B! I’m having a little trouble today because of that “No cats on the internet” thing. A half-assed rescue mission has been, um, mounted over on ICHC.
VVV borrow Brewskis horse and ride to the rescue!
*hands over basket of kitties*
Um, thanks, but these appear to be beanie babies.
Hey! Did I SAY to take them away?
*snuggles a few*
I just stockpile them for such occassions!
*squeals*
Eeeek, this one’s real, it just nommed my hand.
*was not expecting that*
Oops, sorry. That was me. I need to go grab some lunch.
Which will be tricky, given my mostly-invisibleness.
Brings new meaning to watching your diet. Ew.
Nope, it is your beautiful horse neigh?
♪ Come on baby, light my fuse… ♪
Power failure. I hate when that happens.
hi c what you’re an exponent of there
Are you a movie producer? I’d like you to read this super script I’ve written.
I read that! It’s powerful!
*blushes*
Would you believe I wrote it while working in a cube farm?
clearly, not every cube rube need b²
I’m hip to b².
Thank you for not spamming our blog again! Goodbye!
QUICK USE THE BUTTON COMBO THEORY!!!
I think you should fire your LAZOR!
*throws exploding pants*
*5 eagles swoops downs and rips Mydrunktexts head off with his talons and drops it on the ground for ZA*
aww, just ZA?
Ok Badger Whisperer I will drop the torso to you LOL.
We need a new fail. This one’s lost all its power.
Some just fail to generate a spark of enthusiasm!
I am feeling a little drained.
Leave it to schools to keep raising the bar another peg.
Another peg what about another Susan or Ms B or K@tcf or W oeNellie.
This looks shopped. I can tell from some of the pixels and by having seen quite a few shops in my time.
Funnily enough, someone always seems to say that…
E=mc2 = Mariah Carey!
Prove it is not cubed! (Show your work.)
It’s not cubed because the units would not work out correctly. Didn’t your high school physics teacher tell you to check units?
It should say E=MC5
That’s even more energy
E=MC^Hammer, yay
That looks like a children’s classroom though… why would they even put an equation like that up… even if it’s wrong lol.
Einstein certainly didn’t write that, but a Dr Who fan might have…
Looks photoshopped to me. The fonts are the same between the adding picture and the E=MC^3. So if you compare the 3 from the 1+2=3 and the superscript 3 from E=MC^3, you see that they are not the same, as the one from 1+2=3 clearly has a fatter bottom. Not to mention it’s really easy to turn a 2 into a 3 with photoshop. Therefore, this picture is PHOTOSHOPPED.
The really sad thing is, I bet that if anyone tried to correct it with a sharpie marker, the place would probably have them arrested for vandalism…
No, not Einstein’s or Mariah Carey’s. BTW, good evening, watch this video…
omg! u liar, this is not you! this is a korean. ugh i hate lers.
The comments on this site are way more amussing than the pictures.
Sadly, if you run the numbers, knowing that Einstein was in fact, Dyslexic to his death, you see that that is actually correct.
However,
That is a kenetic force equasion, otherwise we would already have Food Replicators and Teleporters.
That is great.
Look what Fail has done… It wins
yeah, yeah, we all know “e equals mc squared” but the pic is actually not a fail… look it up, dumb asses.
ehmmmm,
good shape to learn
wah
cool shape
what are you talking about? 2+1 IS 3. no fail there (,,,)
i lol’d
Well, it all depends on the definition of E, M and C, after all…
(and on a side note, the mass-energy-equivalency E=mc² is only an approximation of the real equation, which is quite a bit more complicated)
*** (and on a side note, the mass-energy-equivalency E=mc² is only an approximation of the real equation, which is quite a bit more complicated) ***
Uh, no it’s not. It’s exact. I have a degree in physics.
lol, the entire surface of the world would have been obliterated when hiroshima was bombed in 1945 if e=mc^3. twice. not to mention the lateral damage. imagine if e really equaled mc^3 but einstein thought it was mc^2. that would suck.
uh huh… they may be just copy and pasted the 3 from the math equation… erm…
I agree. It’s photoshopped. Fail blog gullibility fail
what? e=mc³ is much better than e=mc²! it’s more! must be better!
EUREKA! the answer is 42. Shame on you Mr. Einstein. Now your just average like the guy who came up with E=MC1
This fail is at a Wegmans in Rochester: http://twitpic.com/g2i4a and no, it’s not photoshopped as suggested above.
Eureka!!, that’s how you get faster then light speed!
Enstein FAIL!
it’s correct in c=1 units
This picture isn’t a fail, E=MC2 AND E=MC3. Look it up. FAIL BLOG JUST FAILED!
e^2=m^2*c^4+p^2*c^2 you guys got it all wrong. Muhaha! You all argued about phsically nothing.
Not everyone can be friggin’ Einstein.
Albert is rolling around in his grave at this “You’re doing it WRONG”
… it’s all relative.
seems like albert einstein had failed to us…
nope, he have lied to us…
There is a classic Doctor Who episode featuring Jon Pertwee as the doctor where the Master explains that in temporal physics, E=Mc^3 is in fact correct.
So is this how their going to justify raising my energy prices?
yep you cube not square it. wtf was Einstein thinking!?!
E=MC3 is actually correct. When Einstein first used this theory in the Manhattan project, he underestimated the power and damage it could do. Anyways, it’s “Energy=Mass x Constant cubed”.
is it ok that i dont get this?
E=MC3 and E=MC2, both fail.
‘You do not really understand something unless you can explain it to your grandmother.’ — Albert Einstein.
E < ΦC∞ , then
e < ΦC∞.
‘e is a perfect half, rest of it is an illusion’, he said…
Einstein was wrong end of story!
God is great, I like muslims
This the full explanation of my post from 14 July 2010 at 3:48pm
The Truth about E=MC2, Creation and The Big Bang Theory commonly explained.
When I was still a teenager, in my fourteens, my father called me to his watch-making workshop, sat me down on the top of his lap swinging to the left and to the right along with the tick-tack’s sound of the grandfather clock’s pendulum coming from the furthest corner of the room, he said: “Close your eyes my son and imagine, just imagine”, “Imagine what?” I said, “Imagine the world. Imagine the whole universe” he said calmly “That would be difficult” I replied, But when he pushed me out off of this earthly environment view into Space, helping me to create and build another view about surrounding me cosmos by adding into the imagined picture every part of the existing visible and invisible world; all existing planets, suns, moons, comets, stars, pulsars, quasars, galaxies and all possible imaginable objects of the all existing space between here and there, moving me away from the Solar system, further and further away, passing by all those visible objects and other, he ended me up somewhere where I have just passed the last, or I’d rather say the first star dust, somewhere a few …illiard light years away from our planet Earth, somewhere where I ended up in a deep-deep dark matter drifting away further and further somewhere where I could not see anything, somewhere where I could not hear anything, somewhere where I did not feel anything or any motion. There was a silence, just motionless silence, nothing else but darkness and silence. Inertia. Total inertia.
He kept me within this motionless stage for some time when with the same calm voice he asked the first question: ‘Imagine it? Are you?’ ‘Yes’, I nodded, ‘Now my son’ he simply said, ‘Draw a straight line right across this image of yours, divide it into two pieces, into two halves. Not equal ones! There is nothing like equal halves existing in the entire universe. There is no single particle equal with another… not to mention about a half of the universe. Put one of the cut halves aside and the other half divide in the same manner into two (halves). Continue. Continue cutting remaining halves until it become so small that you have to use a magnifying glass to continue. Continue. Then when it becomes so small again that you have to use a microscope to continue, continue. Continue cutting until you have to use the most powerful electronic microscope on earth to continue. Continue. Continue until you have to only use the most powerful imaginary microscope to continue. Continue’, he said. Then he asked: ‘When or will you ever be able to cut “the last half”? If anything like that “the last half” exist? There will be always a remaining half ready to be cut and divided into two indefinitely’, he added.
‘For some time the world of science is discovering what metaphysical and spiritual teachers have known for centuries. The physical world is not really composed of any matter at all; the basic component of it is a force or essence, which is called energy. Things appear to be solid and separate from each other where our physical senses normally perceive them. While on the atomic and subatomic level, a solid matter is a cluster of small particles. Particles within particle called sub-particles. Bosons, which are assumed to be massless. They were detected by high-energy experiments at the CERN laboratories in 1983. Weinberg, Salam, and Glashow shared the 1979 Nobel Prize for physics for their model, protons, and eventually photons which turn out to be just pure energy’, they said.
The speed of light may be the only constant in the universe. Everything else changes! Mr. Einstein observed that matter could be converted into energy just as energy was converted into matter (and anti-matter) when the universe was created. If everything changes, so the speed of light, too, is changeable.
As it was in 1989 scientists proposed this theory that there is no single sub-particle equal with another sub-particle in the entire universe, ‘Let’s apply this theory to an equation. Let’s try it on the equation of: E=MC2 ‘, he said.
An equation is a mathematical statement, expressed in symbols, that two things are the same (or equivalent). Equations are written with an equal sign ‘=’. Equations are often used to state the equality of two expressions containing one or more variables.
An equation contains left & right side.
When the left side of the equation is ‘E’ – one particle
the right side of the equation is ‘MC2’ – another particle,
logically speaking;
one particle = another particle
Above equation is untrue.
one sub-particle ≠ another sub-particle
Above equation might be or is true.
When the left side of equation is not equal ‘≠’ with the right side, then
E = MC2
Above equation is untrue,
Because and especially that there is a progress; power 2, then
E ≠ MC2
Above equation might be or is true.
When the left side is not equal with the right side of equation it must be then
smaller or greater, > or <.
Then the left side can be or is only < (smaller) because the progress is on the right side.
E < MC2
When variable mass symbol M is replaced by photon symbol Φ
E < ΦC2
Above equation might be or is true,
When the power ‘2’ is replaced by power to ‘3, 4, 5, 6, 7’…etc. or ‘∞’ (to infinity) then the left side of the equation is definitely not equal with the right side because there is even greater progress, then
E < ΦC∞ , then
e < ΦC∞.
‘e is a perfect half, rest of it is an illusion’, look at it he said,
‘all it is illusion’.
‘There are still some who believe that the speed of light may be the only constant in the whole universe, everything else changes. If everything changes so the speed of light does. Everything is energy. Energy is everything. Everything is a light/photon in the infinite speed of light’.
Einstein's statement that 'the distinction between past, present, and future is only an illusion' comes from a letter he wrote to the family of his lifelong friend Michele Besso on 21 March 1955, Einstein Archive, 7-245, published in The Quotable Einstein (Princeton University Press, 1996), p.61.
The Big Bang Theory commonly explained.
The first thing which came to my mind to explain my father's observation to a layman is the sequence of the Russian Doll:
KEEP IT OPENING TO INFINITY.
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Matryoshka_doll.
e