Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.

 

« Previous | Next »


Record Breaking Fail


EDITOR’S NOTE: This post is in response to an email FAIL Blog received from an attorney representing Guinness World Records Limited.

Dear Sir/Madam,

Thanks for writing us an email regarding the “Record Breaking Fail”. Unfortunately, douchebaggy cyber-bullying emails will only bring upon you more shame on your house. I am also resisting the urge to write this email in ALL CAPS.

I believe it is the duty of FAIL Blog(TM) to call out organizations when they encourage the public to do such things as “Break the record” for the “Most Individuals Killed In A Terrorist Act”. We firmly believe that our publication of your fail is protected under the concepts of fair use, commentary and non-trademark use. Please RTFM and we welcome you to teh interwebs.

Since we at FAIL Blog(TM) don’t have a legal defense department, we have complied with your request to remove the trademarked term and logo from the original image. We have used the “naughty bits filter” on the image to secure your naughty, naughty, trademark assertions. However, we have posted your email so that our audience can see why we had to remove the name of the failer from the image. I hope that this is the outcome you have expected as now NO ONE WILL EVER KNOW THAT GUINNESS WORLD RECORDS LIMITED HAS FAILED.

The full legal response can be read here: icanhaz.com/legalresponse

Cheers,
FAIL Blog

P.S.: This is what we think of your letter.

fail owned pwned pictures

Picture by: dunno source. Submitted by: Frankie via Fail Uploader

This record has been removed from the Guinness site.

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 282 Failures in Communication

  1. Bad Guinness, naughty Guinness- never thought I would ever say that!

  2. bono says:

    they did it! they made a new record! I assume that was their only purpose; being noticed in the Guinness book.

  3. Jules ♂ ♪ © says:

    See if you click on that link it sends your IP and MAC address directly to the FBI.

  4. Sammycorgi says:

    I wonder, has anyone ever contacted them and said ‘I think I beat it!’?

  5. Sebasdtian says:

    OMG I’m like the 10th!!!

  6. 5 eagles "enigma" says:

    Well some records are meant to be beat but…….. this is
    not one of them.

  7. dave says:

    LOL! *facepalms multiple times*

  8. 5 eagles "enigma" says:

    Good morning Halifax and grannnycatflap,Jules,K@tcf,
    sammycorgi,sebasdtian,bob

  9. 27b/6 says:

    This smells like a hoax.

    * The guinness world record site does not currently have the design listed.
    * The URL returns a 404. OK, that’s known (the “Fail” notes the record is removed). However, the URL pattern isn’t good for the site (index.asp?ID=xxxx is not valid for any ID).
    * The OTHER records listed in the screenshot don’t exist on Guinness’ site either. Some of these (e.g. largest civilian evacuation) don’t seem like they’d have been removed even if a hypothetical “clean up” of offensive and/or war related records was performed.

    Is this ancient? Or is it photoshop? I vote photoshop.

  10. krs says:

    OMG, using Internet Explorer 6 is certainly a MAJOR failure!

  11. ClabberHead says:

    How about the record for most terrorists killed in an individual act???

  12. Rizzo420 says:

    what happened on September 11?

  13. BAReFOOt says:

    People, this is FAKE! Check the URL from the screenshot. It does not exist. And when you search for “killed” or “terrorist”, you do not find any record like this.

  14. Smyrny says:

    Wow!

  15. Le geek, c'est chic says:

    Choice of web browser fail.

  16. Does it have to be a terrorist attack?

  17. SGmage says:

    Completely fake. Guinness has no such record on file.

  18. The cake is a lie says:

    Let’s break that record!!!

    *Runs to Black Mesa Facility*

  19. North Korea to beat the record?

  20. Emperor, Leader of the Resistance, Tetragramaton Cleric. says:

    Great encouragement… :eyeroll: :avis:

  21. LilaKuh says:

    It’s not a fake. The page existed till 2006 and is accessible via archive.org:

    http://web.archive.org/web/20060905065201/http://www.guinnessworldrecords.com/index.asp?ID=53241

  22. Skodwarde says:

    the real fail is that he’s using internet explorer

  23. mew4ever23 says:

    Ah form website fail.

  24. Gumbejack says:

    Yep FAIL. But remember, terrorists, or at least islamic ones were not involved. It was the US government. Asshats.

    but we all know that by now right?

  25. MasterOfTheXP says:

    Internet Explorer Fail.

  26. Ruther says:

    It’s… SHOWTIME!

  27. Lycan says:


    I reckon achmed must’ve tried to break that record…

  28. ss says:

    What a meaningless statistic. It all depends on what you consider a “terrorist act”. Why is it that when the military cruise missiles a building to get at one or two guys holed up in it, we don’t call it “terrorism”, but when guerrillas strategically bomb a cafe to get at one or two guys they know are in there, it gets the dreaded T-word. Guess what everybody, most terrorism ever committed in history has been at the hands of some government. “Terrorism” is simply a label that that governments give to their enemies’ unconventional/asymmetric tactics. But Delta Force and the Navy SEALs are highly trained in professional terrorism. America’s revolutionary war was fought by terrorists. So was the French Revolution.

  29. Gone2thedogs says:

    I’m off to break some records!!!

  30. Jojo says:

    can you say “REPEAT”!!!!!

    Yeah this is a repeat. That’s the real fail here.

  31. sal says:

    That’s on the guiness world records? Were there official adjudicators on the scene watching to make sure the terrorist didn’t cheat? did the Taliban get a certificate? that’s just plain crazy.

  32. ZzzzZzzz says:

    cristopher columbus was a marsian, right?

  33. Corn says:

    I just realized what the record is.

  34. tinel says:

    hm…this looks like a win to me…lol

  35. NickRene says:

    Now that is a fail if i ever had seen one

  36. IzHuggable ^.^ says:

    I wonder how many people clicked that button….. the one that says break the record….. lol

  37. Alfador says:

    Lets break it! ;D

  38. tdude says:

    In response to this world record, the U.S. tried to break the “most costly war” record displayed on the right side of the page…

  39. blows carrots says:

    GUINESS, YOU FAIL SO HARD! its FAILblog! not some place to advertise, LIKE TEENS GIVE A SHIT ABOUT IF ITS GUINESS! GUINESS SUCKS ASS EVEN IF THIS WASNT HERE!

  40. domo says:

    damn guiness world recaords they censored it

  41. Eric says:

    THEY JUST GOT PWNED! YEAH!

  42. krs says:

    High Quality here : http://guinnessmessup.ytmnd.com/

    Enjoy your failure!

  43. Scooter says:

    Winwinwinwinwinwin

  44. Julia says:

    Hi,

    Unfortunately, I haven’t read your original entry, but even judging by the screen grab, you were highlighting the wrong point. I would question why 9/11 and such like had to be entered into the Guinness Record Book in the first place.

    Secondly, there is the semantics of language. An entry is entered for the record, it can be broken for the record, and any record entered can be eventually broken. This might sound like nonsense, but it is important that we don’t get too obsessed with what appears on the surface. Sadly, we live in a very dangerous world, the 9/11 “record” may get broken, whether we like it or not. I am sure that Guinness is not suggesting that someone should willingly do so.

    You are correct in highlighting the phraseology issue. But similarly, if there is an individual who lived up to 152 years, would it not be a mockery to suggest to “break that record”?

    • Supafly says:

      Get a life Julia. …get a life.

      • Julia says:

        Oh, sorry for raining on your parade ;-)

        • livewire says:

          The fail is the encouragement to “Break this Record!”, as if someone were to TRY to break it just for the sake of breaking it. GWRL is really its own worst enemy, here. If they don’t take down the “Break this Record!” link, I think they will only do themselves more harm than good.
          The encouragement to “Break this Record” for something like lifespan could get people to eat better and exercise more, at least…

          • Julia says:

            I personally don’t see this as an encouragement in any way. “Break this record” is a default phrase, and, as I said, the 9/11 record may one day be broken, whether we or GWRL want it or not. GWRL may try and rephrase the message, to avoid upsetting people… but people can perhaps not take everything at face value. To me, this is one of those oxymorons out there, you can’t criticise everyone enough for linguistic mishaps.

            @livewire – just for the record (sic!), eating better and exercising is not all. There’re so many sportsmen out there who died young, despite being fit.

            I think what FailBlog is best doing is holding a readers’ competition to help the GWRL rephrase “Break the Record”. Or better else, to find and list all the pages that have an “inappropriate” “break the record” link. I suspect it’d go viral in nanosecond ;-)

  45. hen3 says:

    What complete failing azzholes!

  46. Mothy says:

    Wow… I can’t figure which part was funnier… some of the comments or the actual FAIL.

  47. Mac says:

    O SNAP!

    Since I don’t have a legal department also, I would like to hire the guns at ICHCL (I Can Has Cheezburger Legal).
    Their references to interwebs and RTFM are 2g for “traditional” legal firms.
    And the legal team’s response is 133754uc3. \o/

    Unfortunately, they have to legally defend their copyright, trademark, etc etc otherwise (under some laws) they lose it.

    Doesn’t excuse them for being douches about it. :D
    ICHCL – 1 v Others 0 \o/

  48. jakethedude says:

    i would like to consider the comments below a staying on topic fail

  49. Anthony says:

    In regards to the trademark infringement… They are so WRONG. There is no copyright or trademark infringement what so ever. In order for there to be a trademark infringement, you would need to use a logo that was either their or something REALLY close for a product or service of a comparable nature. Your site could fall under reporting and news and the “press” has every right to use whatever logo (tm or not) they want in the reporting of any news worthy event…. fail or not. Tell em to F off!

  50. Some guy says:

    I for one don’t have a problem with people breaking records for killing people.

    It’s just another way of turning themselves in.

  51. Alexander says:

    You know, in order to break a record a Guinness Official must be present at the time of the record breaking or something like that. I guess if you have more corpses. Wouldn’t that make the official an accomplice? Well I guess an official count of the corpses would suffice for the rep to not have to be present during the actual execution of the record breaking. I guess if a person were to launch a WMD in an act of terror, they could easily decimate the Record. Wouldn’t Hitler’s Third Reich and their actions of fascism before and during WW2 constitute terrorism? I mean any kind of act of force or violence against a person or people who don’t agree with you could be considered an act of terrorism. The US law code defines terrorism as such:

    United States Law Code – the law that governs the entire country – contains a definition of terrorism embedded in its requirement that Annual Country reports on Terrorism be submitted by the Secretary of State to Congress every year. (From U.S. Code Title 22, Ch.38, Para. 2656f(d)

    (d) Definitions
    As used in this section—
    (1) the term “international terrorism” means terrorism involving citizens or the territory of more than 1 country;
    (2) the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;
    (3) the term “terrorist group” means any group, or which has significant subgroups which practice, international terrorism;
    (4) the terms “territory” and “territory of the country” mean the land, waters, and airspace of the country; and
    (5) the terms “terrorist sanctuary” and “sanctuary” mean an area in the territory of the country—
    (A) that is used by a terrorist or terrorist organization—
    (i) to carry out terrorist activities, including training, fundraising, financing, and recruitment; or
    (ii) as a transit point; and
    (B) the government of which expressly consents to, or with knowledge, allows, tolerates, or disregards such use of its territory and is not subject to a determination under—
    (i) section 2405(j)(1)(A) of the Appendix to title 50;
    (ii) section 2371 (a) of this title; or
    (iii) section 2780 (d) of this title.

    I’m gonna break that record…How funny I made an observation that broke a record.

    • Alexander says:

      I applied to break this record! I submitted the following to bring to their attention a previous historical event has exceeded their current record’s number:
      The Third Reich of Germany was well known for it’s premeditated murder of over 5 million Jews. Adolf Hitler stands prominently amongst the leaders of this terrorist organization as its figurehead. They accomplished this act of terrorism by a wide range of murder tactics(labor camps, execution, starvation, exposure, human experimentation, decapitation, target practice, weapons testing, burning alive, etc.) over the time period of year 1939 to the end of World War Two in 1945. This record is based on number of human lives extinguished in this single campaign of Jewish persecution. It was the Hatred of Jews by Adolf Hitler which was the primary motivation for these murders totaling approximately 5,752,400 Jewish peoples.
      I recently saw a record on your website regarding the events of September 11, 2001 and the deaths of this terrorist act being the largest on record. After studying the definition of terrorism according to US law, which I quote, “(2) the term “terrorism” means premeditated, politically motivated violence perpetrated against noncombatant targets by subnational groups or clandestine agents;”(From U.S. Code Title 22, Ch.38, Para. 2656f(d)(2)). The actions of The Third Reich fulfill these requirements and their record far exceeds the record set by the events of September 11, 2009.

      I feel kind of sick after submitting this letter.

  52. SlyLoop says:

    Heh, I might go for this record. >:)

  53. splayn says:

    Aren’t you guys protected under the “Fair use” doctrine? I don’t think you even have to censor this.

  54. andrew says:

    hmm this seems cool xDD and btw ppl stressed about columbus he was italian and went to the spanish king for money and the king said no and the queen of spain paid for his trips and men

  55. Tom says:

    I think you ALL FAIL!

  56. Christine says:

    we welcome you to teh webs too. lolz innocent ichc spelling!

  57. aaaaaaavvvvi says:

    i think im gay can any 1 help me find out if i really am?

  58. Glidden says:

    2nd paragraph, towards the end. . . you spelled ‘the’ wrong.

    fail.

    sorry.

  59. xvideoshd says:

    Your site was very nice


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up