Comments on: Take the FAIL Blog Audience Survey http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/ Fail and Epic Fail Pictures and Videos in one blog. For all those precious fail moments, whip out your camera and see your epic fail picture and videos here. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:50:53 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: OneOfTheOther http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-867105 Thu, 06 May 2010 02:02:53 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-867105 I want a steve urkel doll…

]]> By: mmm popsicles http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-554952 Fri, 07 Aug 2009 22:05:31 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-554952 lmao best answer! I give you my 9,000

]]> By: Anon http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-459210 Mon, 08 Jun 2009 21:12:57 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-459210 OVER 9000 INTERNETS!!!!!! O-M-G

]]> By: i club seals http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-458542 Mon, 08 Jun 2009 17:07:15 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-458542 yea internet rich!

]]> By: Gone2thedogs http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-453137 Fri, 05 Jun 2009 01:39:58 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-453137 Why are you always the one doing the chiding of what you consider inappropriate comments? I don’t get what caused you to become the Thought Police of Fail Blog.

P.S.: I am not KaienZeta by the way.

]]> By: black label http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-449278 Wed, 03 Jun 2009 04:35:53 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-449278 assuming you don’t lie…

]]> By: Anomnomnomymous http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-447898 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:03:09 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-447898 Oh nice, that gets through, but anything even remotely critical you slap down. Teabag my balls failblog

]]> By: Anomnomnomymous http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-447894 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 13:02:28 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-447894 AWAITING MODERATION DURR HURR

]]> By: Znjot http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-447325 Tue, 02 Jun 2009 05:57:17 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-447325 It’s over 9000!?!?!?

]]> By: Lisa Liu http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-447147 Mon, 01 Jun 2009 23:04:26 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-447147 ENTER IN THE WRONG INFORMATION EVERYONE

]]> By: Razoa http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-446509 Mon, 01 Jun 2009 17:29:14 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-446509 “We’re sorry!

This offer is not available in your area.
You will be redirected shortly. ”

France Suck’s

]]> By: Ted http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-445110 Sun, 31 May 2009 20:06:23 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-445110 EXCUSE ME?

]]> By: dontsayanythingjusttouchit http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-444385 Sun, 31 May 2009 00:31:47 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-444385 WHAT 9000!?1

]]> By: xRGTMx http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-444140 Sat, 30 May 2009 17:56:46 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-444140 I just love the negative comments here.

]]> By: NeroX http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443733 Sat, 30 May 2009 09:07:45 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443733 Looks like someone plays too much of this game…. *Clickie* =)

]]> By: Ba Lonely http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443593 Sat, 30 May 2009 02:37:15 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443593 There are unique 840 ways to answer this survey. But the only way to WIN is by not playing the game.

]]> By: Cyrus http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443574 Sat, 30 May 2009 01:32:05 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443574 lol

]]> By: AVM http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443567 Sat, 30 May 2009 01:15:52 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443567 Not again?

]]> By: Toto http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443549 Sat, 30 May 2009 00:16:39 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443549 Failblog’s owners are slowly but steadily becoming a real pain in this website. First the branding of the videos, then the “vote for us for the webbies” cavalcade of profoundly annoying posts and now this thing about audience surveys.

The moment they take the site in this direction is the moment it starts rubbing me the wrong way, so I stop recommending it, I stop checking it so regularly and they eventually lose a number of followers. How shit.

]]> By: Cuddlefish http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443530 Fri, 29 May 2009 23:35:06 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443530 Well that really is a matter of opinion.

]]> By: abstract ♒ ♀ ♥ http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443340 Fri, 29 May 2009 21:11:21 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443340 *applauds Avis* indeed it is so for male or female i check ‘no’ lol…. even though I do denote my gender next to my screen name

]]> By: abstract ♒ ♀ ♥ http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443333 Fri, 29 May 2009 21:09:19 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443333 A is for apple….. no, um…Agnostic. no WASPS here, those are scarry!

]]> By: abstract ♒ ♀ ♥ http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443330 Fri, 29 May 2009 21:08:33 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443330 i’m a WASA in eastern US

]]> By: Bowserknight http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-443320 Fri, 29 May 2009 21:04:35 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-443320 What do you think you are, a JEDI waving your hand around like that?

]]> By: matt http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-436116 Tue, 26 May 2009 05:08:05 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-436116 Woohoo

]]> By: Just some guy http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-436115 Tue, 26 May 2009 05:06:29 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-436115 Shut up Ted!

]]> By: Bard http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-435443 Mon, 25 May 2009 14:21:56 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-435443 What? 9000!?

]]> By: Wandering Troll, Failblog breaker master http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-435091 Mon, 25 May 2009 03:07:17 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-435091 … really? Am I the only one who noticed the over 9000 thing they stuck in there? I know you don’t really follow in-jokes, but in this case, YOU ALL FAIL!

Thank you and have a nice day.

]]> By: jai coup http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434966 Sun, 24 May 2009 21:54:18 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434966 “Talking to”? You’s funny!

]]> By: jai coup http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434965 Sun, 24 May 2009 21:53:11 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434965 You guys are so materialistic!

]]> By: jai coup http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434963 Sun, 24 May 2009 21:52:18 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434963 Surveys make me realize that I really matter.

]]> By: armanrules http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434625 Sun, 24 May 2009 12:31:13 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434625 FAILCOPTER
CLICK MY NAME FOR DETAILS

]]> By: cherry http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434608 Sun, 24 May 2009 11:57:32 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434608 man! I HATE being homogenized!

]]> By: CIS http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434330 Sat, 23 May 2009 21:43:51 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434330 trolls are trolls… what can you do

]]> By: BalisticPickels http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434327 Sat, 23 May 2009 21:40:47 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434327 A used donkey!!?

]]> By: BalisticPickels http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434326 Sat, 23 May 2009 21:39:07 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434326 A used donkey?

]]> By: Morvevissi http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434311 Sat, 23 May 2009 21:21:31 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434311 wait…..i have 18,000 internets, what can i get for THAT much?

]]> By: Morvevissi http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434310 Sat, 23 May 2009 21:20:15 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434310 imma guy o.O
i was under the impression that Avis is a girl, but who can tell on the internet *shrug*

]]> By: Morvevissi http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434308 Sat, 23 May 2009 21:18:08 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434308 dude, if you have such strong veiw about how the world is messed up WHY THE HELL ARE YOU ON FAILBLOG

]]> By: Morvevissi http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434307 Sat, 23 May 2009 21:15:57 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434307 rofl WIN

]]> By: armanrules http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434297 Sat, 23 May 2009 20:57:57 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434297 yep give them all to me.
(gives them)
*runs*

]]> By: armanrules http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434295 Sat, 23 May 2009 20:56:30 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434295 i got no internets :|

]]> By: armanrules http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434292 Sat, 23 May 2009 20:54:56 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434292 NO THEY WONT!!!!!!

]]> By: BalisticPickels http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434201 Sat, 23 May 2009 19:16:42 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434201 can i trade in my 9000 Internets for a bj?

]]> By: Andie http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434191 Sat, 23 May 2009 18:58:48 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434191 Yeap.

]]> By: A Noun http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-434036 Sat, 23 May 2009 16:18:38 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-434036 WTF is with your age demographic? You have that divided into absolutely stupid chunks. No Ad Sales agency would take that seriously.

]]> By: Leverworst http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-433968 Sat, 23 May 2009 15:08:31 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-433968 Yes they will.

]]> By: Francisco Costa http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-433949 Sat, 23 May 2009 14:51:02 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-433949 Take the real Survey

]]> By: Brewski http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-433923 Sat, 23 May 2009 14:28:37 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-433923 Having demographic data on your viewers can greatly increase ad revenue, since it allows more targeted advertising. I’m okay with it, in this case. If they target me specifically, though, I don’t like it. For example, google tracks all your searches, and other sites use cookies to track your web-browsing habits, so they can target ads at you. I find that a tad too big-brother-ish. I try to cleanse my cookies and other spyware regularly.

]]> By: ♀nΣ šWε└∟ ƒ∞þ http://failblog.org/2009/05/29/audience-survey-2/comment-page-1/#comment-433920 Sat, 23 May 2009 14:16:25 +0000 http://failblog.org/2009/05/22/take-the-fail-blog-audience-survey/#comment-433920 ^ Irony recognition skills: yours are non-existent, KaienZeta. Result? Sense of humor: UTTER FAIL. You have my sympathy. . . Unless, of course, you were attempting to demonstrate a rudimentary understanding of irony as well. In that case, well, it came off just plain rude. (Perhaps this post will do the same, although I wasn’t necessarily aiming for that.) Having said that, I’m over it and outta here.

]]>