Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.
 

« Previous | Next »

Security Fail


fail owned pwned pictures

Submitted by Nick

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 324 Failures in Communication

  1. Malicite, Bored Paralegal and Supporter of the Anti-Troll Initiative says:

    Fence coming in 2012.

  2. FruitcakeSolvesAll *5 days and counting* says:

    I believe it might just do the job against a retard.

  3. They’re on a pay-as-you-go setup.

  4. Arthur Eld says:

    I wanted to rob that place. But I can’t find a way in.

  5. Arthur Eld says:

    Is that a lock on the door?

  6. fluffy >ZAP!< DOT ORG! says:

    I wonder if anyone actually uses that door, and if the owners get pissed when you step over the little tiny bushes.

  7. SP Riley says:

    Stone walls do not a prison make,

    Nor iron bars a cage

  8. Duffy says:

    Ya can’t keep me in here, copper!! I’m bustin’ out!
    (gets spoon and starts to dig under gate)

  9. hartog says:

    I do believe that this picture was taken from a much greater distance then meets the eye… These tiny bushes are in fact man high, making this the biggest door ever.

  10. Penguins13 says:

    That must be Les Nessman’s house

  11. Your face going down the drain says:

    Wow such a fail…

  12. Pither says:

    Somebody’s gonna have to go back and get a $#!+load of dimes!

  13. Onels4 says:

    This picture was used by people, to illustrate windows XP Firewall’s efficiency.

  14. Jerry tuulips says:

    Dude thats insane

  15. Wolf says:

    That,s one hell of a glass wall…

  16. 5 eagles says:

    “Owww that hurt”.

  17. Justin DOT ORG! says:

    This confused the heck outta the area mormons, but the Jehovah’s Witnesses now are glad to have one more door to knock on.

  18. Onionfury says:

    Don’t you know? The bushes are really force field generators.

  19. Arthur Eld says:

    Waaaaait… can it be? Is it possible that no one yelled PHOTOSHOPPED so far? Is the apocalypse coming?

  20. Hey Arthur, sorry for the lapse in conversation..I actualy had a real piece of work to do. But Kant is a horses ass. The basic tenet of his entire body of work relies on a religious principle that all people are born with some inherit goodness. He then goes on his entire life to explain how certain acts are good and certain acts are evil while completely ignoring the utilitarian nature of life. Everyting he ever wrote is wrong.

    • Speakest thou of Immanuel Kant?

      • What other Kant is there? Every argument he ever made was ridden with assumptions that lacked any sort of scientific proof. You can’t honestly perscribe to Kants ethical theories and still believe in evolution. Kant is as lame and inate an explanation of ethics as inteligent design is to the progression of life. There is no such thing as truth or beauty, evil or good as all of these topics are subjective. I would think Arthur being German might have read Neitche at some point in his life, but apparantly not.

        • The Moomin says:

          You’ve taken a vow of silence because of Nietzsche?

        • I’m sure there are many Kants. Much like there are many Obama’s in America. What do you mean by; “There is no such thing as truth or beauty, evil or good as all these topics are subjective.”? Are you saying that if something is not immediately tangible, there is no way it can exist? And why would Arthur being German have any impact on whether or not he has read any Nietzsche?

          • sofaking retardant says:

            Not at all am I saying that. I am saying that there is no such thing as truth because it is subjective to the person or entity that adheres it to be truth. The same goes for beauty, good and evil. It is proven through the experiment that is human existance. What could be considered abhorent in one culture, could be perfectly normal in another. Kant is constantly labeling things good or evil. And his argument are constantly riddled with assumptions such as that all people are born with an inherent will do do good. It just isn’t so. Whatever we have programmed into our brains as instinct plus whatever we experience in our lives makes up our entire being. We are no different than animals in this consideration. Kant and most other ethicists refuse to believe this. They rather think that humans are different, and often quote a devine presence as the source.

            • Just because something is subjective, doesn’t mean it doesn’t exist! I agree with you insofar that it is impossible to label things good or evil, right or wrong as so much depends on individual perception. However, this could also apply to ideas. It’s impossible to say whether or not we are born with an inherent will to do good as we mimic our parents so much. It’s hard to argue either way with your point “Whatever we have programmed into our brains as instinct plus whatever we experience in our lives makes up our entire being” as I’m still not sure what my ‘entire being’ is. Personally I think there’s more to humans (and possibly animals) than just instinct and experience. A person can apply logic to a situation he’s never been in before to resolve it in a way pleasing to them. All debates have to start with assumptions. Most only have basic ones like; this reality is real. otherwise debates would go nowhere.

              • sofaking retardant says:

                Thats very true, all debates do rely on some basic assumptions or there would be no control to test a hypothesis. And I was also agreeing with you that intangible things such as concepts can certainly exist. But there is nothing more to human life than the mechanics we are given at birth. We are an extension of our parents and every other animal in our bloodline that we evolved from. Even if a situation seems completely foreign, the reaction that a human will take will be the consequence of every action that has come before said incedent. To assume that there is something inside of us, a soul as most cultures would call it, has no scientific merit. It is a blind assumption that has simply found it’s way into our existance through superstition and religion. I personaly am an agnostic because I feel that humans have no rights to claim any assumptions about there existance, especially when they are trying to impact the destiny of another individual. A specific example is the death penalty. How can we say it is fair to put someone to death when we don’t understand the punishment. It is so far scientificly impossible to understand what happens after death. And since cruel and unusual punishment is illegal, why do we still adhere to this system. It is because some people are trying to push their religious assumptions onto the rest of us, and that is wrong. I don’t assume that anything I experience is true or beautiful, good or evil, I don’t even know if it is real. Kant’s arguments are laden with these assuptions and have had terrible consequences since they came to be popular.

                • fluffy >ZAP!< DOT ORG! says:

                  I have issue with your adherence to “scientific merit”. The scientist only accepts what he can measure and repeat. All other experiences are not valid, for a scientist.
                  That being said, you’ve inspired me to read Nietzsche. Thank you.

                  • Dragonwriter says:

                    I’ve read Nietzsche. Anyone who claims that “When a woman has scholarly inclinations there is generally something wrong with her sexual nature” (Beyond Good and Evil) is not going to get any respect from me. And if you really want to get hot under the collar, read Thus Spake Zarathrusttra. Here’s a very small example:

                    “Everything in woman is a riddle, and everything in woman hath one solution –it is called pregnancy.
                    Man is for woman a means: the purpose is always the child. But what is woman for man?
                    Two different things wanteth the true man: danger and diversion. Therefore wanteth he woman, as the most dangerous plaything.”

                • DrB says:

                  ♫ There’s noooo aphrodisiac like lonliness,
                  Truth, beauty…and a picture of you ♫
                  .
                  I shall continue to find things true, beautiful, evil and good – and sure, my interpretation of these things is not a universal absolute – but it is valid, all the same.

      • Arthur Eld says:

        Alas, he does. SK, I can’t get into that discussion for two reasons: 1) I have to leave in a couple of minutes. 2) I never studied philosophy and therefore don’t really know enough to argue profundly. But since the categoric imperative is part of the fundament on which I lead my agnostic life, I disagree with your last sentence.

  21. Arthur Eld says:

    I wish you all a nice weekend! See you on Monday.

  22. Marius says:

    This appears to have the same security as my hedge fund.

  23. ZombieApocalypse says:

    What we can’t see is the sign on the inside of this door, which has this reminder to consider before entering the asylum:
    .
    Toothpick Instructions:
    .
    Hold stick near center of its length. Moisten pointed end in mouth. Insert in tooth space, blunt end next to gum. Use gentle in-out motion.

  24. c0nzo says:

    maybe the fence is invisible

  25. FailVader says:

    anti-dwarfs fence

  26. veggielover says:

    Best invisible fence I’ve ever not seen.

  27. Mopsy says:

    Yeah, it won’t keep you from getting in, but how are you going to get OUT?

  28. baphemat says:

    unbelievable, in this crowd i would expect atleast one of you to make the connection, sheesh. it is a green door> google “the green door” and sudenly this will be a lot funnier.

  29. Diamondshark says:

    I bet the door is to Narnia…

  30. btx says:

    oh shut your balls.

    MINIMALISM,
    WIN.

  31. Summer Glau says:

    for all of you who haqve read all of this, up to here,
    GET A F***ing life. Ewe, i caught a bug in my mouth. This is just sad how many of you in this stupid chat.
    P.s. whatch the sarah conner cronicals and
    FIREFLY!

    this food is problamatic…
    hehe

  32. Colonel Corn says:

    no (of)fence, but thats just ridiculous.

  33. Matt says:

    it reminds me of Les Nessman’s office “walls” from WKRP in Cincinnati.

  34. Craig says:

    Long-term planning win.

  35. cj says:

    it’s funny, but an obvious photoshop.

  36. Seth says:

    More like Photoshop fail, You can see the shadow from the fence on the pavement.

  37. steroids says:

    I am shocked of that crazy door. Very funny, but unique and amazing photoshop.

  38. Amy says:

    hey
    Im really horny n looking for some one any takers here?
    x
    x

  39. Dargus says:

    A 150 pound person, landing from a small hop, will detonate the Lawn Defender ™ landmines. People over 150 pounds or the age of 30 don’t hop.

    It’s the perfect barrier, really.

  40. dukethepcdr says:

    Maybe the guy who planted the bushes has played too many video games where a “barrier” like that is all it takes to stop your character.

  41. limak says:

    1000% fake.
    sorry.

  42. Hahaha hahaha lolololol says:

    Funny ’cause where I live probably 65% of houses in my city have a gate and such similar to that one. Okay, ALMOST the same.

  43. victor says:

    i don’t see where he failed, he clearly installed a gate therefore he is safe lol

  44. Josie says:

    wow only a true retard would not be able to break into that house!

  45. Donnie says:

    Hrm, looks remarkably similar to the Windows firewall.

  46. Sondre says:

    Omg, U people sucks. Think in a few years forwards. The grass or three’s or what ever it is will grow and be big so the door is as big as the three’s

  47. qing says:

    IF YOU DON”T GET IT READ:

    I’m sure many of you don’t find this funny….you think it’s photoshopped and anybody could get through that door.

    Well, here’s the explanation
    Yes, it’s photoshopped. This was originally created to be a representation of Windows Firewall. Therefore it was funny as a security fail.

    However, this version of the picture doesn’t explain that and therefore it doesn’t seem funny.

  48. kazy says:

    It’s for dogs…


Your Comment

 

 

Search

Daily Shipments of Fail via Email


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Tags

  • Pictures by Month

  • Recent Comments

    Hakan on Shoplifter Fail
    Andriffic on She does have a gorgeous pair …
    Andriffic on She does have a gorgeous pair …
    Andriffic on She does have a gorgeous pair …
    Andriffic on She does have a gorgeous pair …
    Iavor55 on She does have a gorgeous pair …
    Tansy on Aww, a sweet kiss on the …
    Elley on Fail Videos
    coyote on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    coyote on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz