<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Related Purchase Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/</link>
	<description>Fail and Epic Fail Pictures and Videos in one blog. For all those precious fail moments, whip out your camera and see your epic fail picture and videos here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Tue, 16 Mar 2010 10:09:01 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Arden</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-545078</link>
		<dc:creator>Arden</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 01 Aug 2009 05:49:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-545078</guid>
		<description>What makes me laugh more is the fact that the person that came across this was actually looking to buy one of these.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What makes me laugh more is the fact that the person that came across this was actually looking to buy one of these.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: susan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-501809</link>
		<dc:creator>susan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 03 Jul 2009 06:34:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-501809</guid>
		<description>good info</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good info</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: lolol</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-480824</link>
		<dc:creator>lolol</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 20 Jun 2009 16:03:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-480824</guid>
		<description>&quot;Submitted by Peter S&quot;

so what was you planning on doing with it once you bought it peter?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Submitted by Peter S&#8221;</p>
<p>so what was you planning on doing with it once you bought it peter?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Chris</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-480451</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 19 Jun 2009 21:33:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-480451</guid>
		<description>I think the better fail would be the other way around... If those that bought the vibrator bought the baby toy it would follow reflexively that those who bought the baby toy bought the Vibrator so, just saying if you were shopping for baby toys and an &quot;adult toy&quot; showed up in the Recommended Products I think that would be a better Fail...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think the better fail would be the other way around&#8230; If those that bought the vibrator bought the baby toy it would follow reflexively that those who bought the baby toy bought the Vibrator so, just saying if you were shopping for baby toys and an &#8220;adult toy&#8221; showed up in the Recommended Products I think that would be a better Fail&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ahmed</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-469936</link>
		<dc:creator>ahmed</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 14 Jun 2009 07:43:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-469936</guid>
		<description>:D right</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p> <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' />  right</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mwahohoho</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-456928</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwahohoho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 17:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-456928</guid>
		<description>Mom needs toys too</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Mom needs toys too</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaliyah Love</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-456448</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaliyah Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 05:57:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-456448</guid>
		<description>wow I feel sorry for your gf LOL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>wow I feel sorry for your gf LOL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Aaliyah Love</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-456447</link>
		<dc:creator>Aaliyah Love</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 07 Jun 2009 05:56:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-456447</guid>
		<description>People with babies need orgasms too!:)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>People with babies need orgasms too!:)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mwahohoho</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-455605</link>
		<dc:creator>Mwahohoho</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 06 Jun 2009 08:16:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-455605</guid>
		<description>Even so, that&#039;s hilarious--quite clever actually
if not hahaha</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Even so, that&#8217;s hilarious&#8211;quite clever actually<br />
if not hahaha</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rob</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-455305</link>
		<dc:creator>Rob</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 05 Jun 2009 21:28:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-455305</guid>
		<description>This website should list itself as FAIL.  Why is a didlo and a child&#039;s toy a FAIL?  Parents arent allowed to enjoy themselves or get adventurous/kinky?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This website should list itself as FAIL.  Why is a didlo and a child&#8217;s toy a FAIL?  Parents arent allowed to enjoy themselves or get adventurous/kinky?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone2thedogs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-443581</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone2thedogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 30 May 2009 01:54:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-443581</guid>
		<description>Regardless of whether you are being sincere or sarcastic (and there is a lot of sarcasm going on on this website), I am glad that at least someone responded to my comments. Notice how JasonK never returned to argue his case. The site is full of &quot;regulars&quot; who are offended at the slightest matters, but who aren&#039;t nearly as intelligent as they claim to be. What is worse, I got labeled a troll for disagreeing with &quot;regulars&quot;, whereas a &quot;regular&quot; got away with calling me &quot;dipshit&quot;. Hypocrisy galore!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Regardless of whether you are being sincere or sarcastic (and there is a lot of sarcasm going on on this website), I am glad that at least someone responded to my comments. Notice how JasonK never returned to argue his case. The site is full of &#8220;regulars&#8221; who are offended at the slightest matters, but who aren&#8217;t nearly as intelligent as they claim to be. What is worse, I got labeled a troll for disagreeing with &#8220;regulars&#8221;, whereas a &#8220;regular&#8221; got away with calling me &#8220;dipshit&#8221;. Hypocrisy galore!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lawl</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-441205</link>
		<dc:creator>Lawl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 23:38:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-441205</guid>
		<description>Photoshopped am i right?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photoshopped am i right?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hannatude</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-440581</link>
		<dc:creator>Hannatude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 28 May 2009 17:37:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-440581</guid>
		<description>Are...Are you Mr. Spock? Because... *Sniff* I haven&#039;t seen nor heard a logical statement that beautiful since the last episode of Star Trek (the original series)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are&#8230;Are you Mr. Spock? Because&#8230; *Sniff* I haven&#8217;t seen nor heard a logical statement that beautiful since the last episode of Star Trek (the original series)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: josh</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-437765</link>
		<dc:creator>josh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 27 May 2009 08:30:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-437765</guid>
		<description>good thing the price of the other option (10.07) and the price of the baby toy pictured (30.00) matches..... FAKE FAIL</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>good thing the price of the other option (10.07) and the price of the baby toy pictured (30.00) matches&#8230;.. FAKE FAIL</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-435133</link>
		<dc:creator>ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 May 2009 04:38:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-435133</guid>
		<description>did he die?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>did he die?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DFL</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-434385</link>
		<dc:creator>DFL</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 23:36:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-434385</guid>
		<description>Sometimes, products are made TOO realistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sometimes, products are made TOO realistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Count Blah</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-433697</link>
		<dc:creator>Count Blah</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 03:09:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-433697</guid>
		<description>What Z said.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>What Z said.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Beardape</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-433410</link>
		<dc:creator>Beardape</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 20:05:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-433410</guid>
		<description>These Ustomers wouldn&#039;t have had to buy the Ball-Tivity center if Doc Johnson did his job right!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>These Ustomers wouldn&#8217;t have had to buy the Ball-Tivity center if Doc Johnson did his job right!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hartog</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-432459</link>
		<dc:creator>hartog</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 13:57:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-432459</guid>
		<description>This is not a fail. It&#039;s a modern day mom WIN!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a fail. It&#8217;s a modern day mom WIN!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone2thedogs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-431977</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone2thedogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 05:42:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-431977</guid>
		<description>Its Benjamin, not Benjimen.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Its Benjamin, not Benjimen.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone2thedogs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-431949</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone2thedogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:31:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-431949</guid>
		<description>Sentence above should read: Your logic is flawed, and, as we saw, you didn’t even report your answer correctly the first time.

Sorry about the typo.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Sentence above should read: Your logic is flawed, and, as we saw, you didn’t even report your answer correctly the first time.</p>
<p>Sorry about the typo.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone2thedogs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-431945</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone2thedogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:27:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-431945</guid>
		<description>Also, the comment made by The One is valid. Using my 100m race analogy, if you run the 100m in 9.50 seconds, and I claim that I can run the 100m between 9.00 and 9.99 seconds inclusive, then the probability of me running the race in 9.50 seconds is 0.01 or 1% (i.e. 99% certainty my time is not the same as yours). This says nothing about whether I crossed the finish line before or after you. All it says is that is 99% unlikely that we had the same time.

In order for it to be 99% certain that my time is slower than yours, you would have to have run the 100m in 9.00 seconds (right at the top of the range) and I would then have a 99% chance of running 100m between 9.01 and 9.99s.

In our example, Oh Naaah! posted his comment at some point between 1 hour, 2 minutes, 0 seconds, 0 milliseconds and 0 microseconds and 1 hour, 2 minutes, 59 seconds, 999 milliseconds and 999 microseconds after midnight. The likelihood of me posting somewhere in this range, but not at the exact same microsecond as Oh Naaah, is, as you calculated, 99.9999983%. This in itself does not say anything about whether I was slower or not. The value you calculated is only valid for a random point of time in the interval mentioned, and only calculates the probability of me posting around, but not exactly at the same time, as Oh Naaah.

Hence, your comments prove nothing. Your logic is flawed, and, as we say, you didn&#039;t even report your answer correctly the first time. Hence, you would fail massively at a nerd conference, and, if I have the fortune of being at the same event, would expose how utterly ignorant and self-righteous a person you are.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Also, the comment made by The One is valid. Using my 100m race analogy, if you run the 100m in 9.50 seconds, and I claim that I can run the 100m between 9.00 and 9.99 seconds inclusive, then the probability of me running the race in 9.50 seconds is 0.01 or 1% (i.e. 99% certainty my time is not the same as yours). This says nothing about whether I crossed the finish line before or after you. All it says is that is 99% unlikely that we had the same time.</p>
<p>In order for it to be 99% certain that my time is slower than yours, you would have to have run the 100m in 9.00 seconds (right at the top of the range) and I would then have a 99% chance of running 100m between 9.01 and 9.99s.</p>
<p>In our example, Oh Naaah! posted his comment at some point between 1 hour, 2 minutes, 0 seconds, 0 milliseconds and 0 microseconds and 1 hour, 2 minutes, 59 seconds, 999 milliseconds and 999 microseconds after midnight. The likelihood of me posting somewhere in this range, but not at the exact same microsecond as Oh Naaah, is, as you calculated, 99.9999983%. This in itself does not say anything about whether I was slower or not. The value you calculated is only valid for a random point of time in the interval mentioned, and only calculates the probability of me posting around, but not exactly at the same time, as Oh Naaah.</p>
<p>Hence, your comments prove nothing. Your logic is flawed, and, as we say, you didn&#8217;t even report your answer correctly the first time. Hence, you would fail massively at a nerd conference, and, if I have the fortune of being at the same event, would expose how utterly ignorant and self-righteous a person you are.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone2thedogs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-431938</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone2thedogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 04:10:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-431938</guid>
		<description>OK. Sorry. One slip on my part. Proves nothing.

As for your comment on the other fail: I read the Onion article posted by someone else. I have read hundreds of other articles from The Onion. I have watched most of their videos on YouTube. At the end of all this, my conclusion is that I don&#039;t find their brand of humor appealing. Hence I opined that &quot;The Onion is lame.&quot; I see nothing about posting such a comment that makes me a troll. Are you saying I am not entitled to my opinion? Its obvious who is trying to put down who in this case.

As to your assertion that I should try to come up with something marginally clever, I would like to ask what is so clever about comments like: &quot;Morning!&quot;, &quot;Hiya!&quot; and *squeeze* that comprises perhaps two-thirds of the content on Failblog&#039;s comments pages? Just because they are not critical about someone or something does not mean they are the only acceptable types of comments on Failblog. If anything, they serve as reminders of the inherent cliqueishness and acknowledgment of the shared inward-looking attitudes of Failblog &quot;regulars&quot;. (Which is a nonsensical term because I have made checking the blog for new fails and voting on prospective ones part of my daily routine).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OK. Sorry. One slip on my part. Proves nothing.</p>
<p>As for your comment on the other fail: I read the Onion article posted by someone else. I have read hundreds of other articles from The Onion. I have watched most of their videos on YouTube. At the end of all this, my conclusion is that I don&#8217;t find their brand of humor appealing. Hence I opined that &#8220;The Onion is lame.&#8221; I see nothing about posting such a comment that makes me a troll. Are you saying I am not entitled to my opinion? Its obvious who is trying to put down who in this case.</p>
<p>As to your assertion that I should try to come up with something marginally clever, I would like to ask what is so clever about comments like: &#8220;Morning!&#8221;, &#8220;Hiya!&#8221; and *squeeze* that comprises perhaps two-thirds of the content on Failblog&#8217;s comments pages? Just because they are not critical about someone or something does not mean they are the only acceptable types of comments on Failblog. If anything, they serve as reminders of the inherent cliqueishness and acknowledgment of the shared inward-looking attitudes of Failblog &#8220;regulars&#8221;. (Which is a nonsensical term because I have made checking the blog for new fails and voting on prospective ones part of my daily routine).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone2thedogs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-431932</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone2thedogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:43:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-431932</guid>
		<description>You seem to suffer from not knowing what &quot;degree of accuracy&quot; means. You have never disproved that I posted at the same minute (time rounded to the nearest minute). All you have proven is that it is unlikely (though not impossible) that I posted at the same microsecond (time rounded to the nearest microsecond). There is a massive difference.

If I say I can run the 100m at the same time as Usain Bolt, accurate to the nearest second, all this means is that I can run the 100m in 10 seconds or less. This is not the same as claiming that I can run the 100m in 9.69s (which, you will notice, is accurate to the nearest hundredth of a second).

Also, your English leaves much to be desired. &quot; And what, be praised by little minded like you?&quot; is not only grammatically dubious, but has no noun to go with the &quot;little-minded&quot; adjective, so I will never know what &quot;little-minded &quot; you think I am.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You seem to suffer from not knowing what &#8220;degree of accuracy&#8221; means. You have never disproved that I posted at the same minute (time rounded to the nearest minute). All you have proven is that it is unlikely (though not impossible) that I posted at the same microsecond (time rounded to the nearest microsecond). There is a massive difference.</p>
<p>If I say I can run the 100m at the same time as Usain Bolt, accurate to the nearest second, all this means is that I can run the 100m in 10 seconds or less. This is not the same as claiming that I can run the 100m in 9.69s (which, you will notice, is accurate to the nearest hundredth of a second).</p>
<p>Also, your English leaves much to be desired. &#8221; And what, be praised by little minded like you?&#8221; is not only grammatically dubious, but has no noun to go with the &#8220;little-minded&#8221; adjective, so I will never know what &#8220;little-minded &#8221; you think I am.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Gone2thedogs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-431923</link>
		<dc:creator>Gone2thedogs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 May 2009 03:31:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-431923</guid>
		<description>My comment (See above): &quot;I am the one who just missed it&quot;.

Your response: &quot;So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.&quot;

&quot;Just missed it&quot; does not equal &quot;I posted at the same time&quot;. Comprehension FAIL on your part.

My comment: &quot;The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond..&quot;

Your comment:&quot;I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0&quot;. 

Yes, I know it is. It is still unclear to me why you tried to show me this since I NEVER claimed that I had posted at the same time (to the nearest microsecond).  Any one with a calculator can figure out that the probability of two persons posting on the same forum at the same time (to the nearest microsecond) is 0.0000017%. What did you ever gain from posting this? All you are trying to do is render false an assertion that I never made. Nothing was gained from your hard work except the obvious fact that you were trying to show-off number crunching, and going with the flow in bashing someone who lamented that he was just a little too late to be the first poster.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>My comment (See above): &#8220;I am the one who just missed it&#8221;.</p>
<p>Your response: &#8220;So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8220;Just missed it&#8221; does not equal &#8220;I posted at the same time&#8221;. Comprehension FAIL on your part.</p>
<p>My comment: &#8220;The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond..&#8221;</p>
<p>Your comment:&#8221;I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0&#8243;. </p>
<p>Yes, I know it is. It is still unclear to me why you tried to show me this since I NEVER claimed that I had posted at the same time (to the nearest microsecond).  Any one with a calculator can figure out that the probability of two persons posting on the same forum at the same time (to the nearest microsecond) is 0.0000017%. What did you ever gain from posting this? All you are trying to do is render false an assertion that I never made. Nothing was gained from your hard work except the obvious fact that you were trying to show-off number crunching, and going with the flow in bashing someone who lamented that he was just a little too late to be the first poster.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: i club seals</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-431627</link>
		<dc:creator>i club seals</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 21:48:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-431627</guid>
		<description>1. What are you doing looking at the &quot;thing&quot; anyway?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>1. What are you doing looking at the &#8220;thing&#8221; anyway?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonK</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-430359</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 12:12:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-430359</guid>
		<description>I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0, so saying &quot;I posted it at the same minute he did&quot; proves nothing. 

And I never said anything about becoming a failblog legend. And what, be praised by little minded like you? LOL, dipshit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0, so saying &#8220;I posted it at the same minute he did&#8221; proves nothing. </p>
<p>And I never said anything about becoming a failblog legend. And what, be praised by little minded like you? LOL, dipshit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: BRING BACK THE INTRO!!!</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-429958</link>
		<dc:creator>BRING BACK THE INTRO!!!</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 May 2009 08:18:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-429958</guid>
		<description>The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond, just that it was the same time rounded to the nearest minute. Your self-congratulatory mathematics lesson proves you have nothing better to do than making fun of others online. Knowing how to divide one hundred percent by one million microseconds does not make you a legend on Failblog or anywhere else.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond, just that it was the same time rounded to the nearest minute. Your self-congratulatory mathematics lesson proves you have nothing better to do than making fun of others online. Knowing how to divide one hundred percent by one million microseconds does not make you a legend on Failblog or anywhere else.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Crypdan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-429771</link>
		<dc:creator>Crypdan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 23:34:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-429771</guid>
		<description>Photoshop?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Photoshop?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-429743</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:45:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-429743</guid>
		<description>Moms need toys too!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Moms need toys too!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Z</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-429740</link>
		<dc:creator>Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 22:44:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-429740</guid>
		<description>Just &#039;cause you can&#039;t find it doesn&#039;t mean it&#039;s not there. ;)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Just &#8217;cause you can&#8217;t find it doesn&#8217;t mean it&#8217;s not there. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_wink.gif' alt=';)' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boshan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-429708</link>
		<dc:creator>Boshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:45:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-429708</guid>
		<description>exist****</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>exist****</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Boshan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-429706</link>
		<dc:creator>Boshan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 21:44:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-429706</guid>
		<description>The g-spot doesnt even excess i think i will add</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The g-spot doesnt even excess i think i will add</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NotSo</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-429101</link>
		<dc:creator>NotSo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:55:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-429101</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t think this is a fail... have you ever had a baby in the house? Time is of the essence.
It’s just more efficient to do it yourself! Git’er Done!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think this is a fail&#8230; have you ever had a baby in the house? Time is of the essence.<br />
It’s just more efficient to do it yourself! Git’er Done!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shillaqueen</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428992</link>
		<dc:creator>Shillaqueen</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:08:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428992</guid>
		<description>When did amazon.com start selling sex aids? Was this a desperate act on their part because of the economic crisis or did Hugh Hefner buy out amazon or something?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When did amazon.com start selling sex aids? Was this a desperate act on their part because of the economic crisis or did Hugh Hefner buy out amazon or something?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JasonK</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428989</link>
		<dc:creator>JasonK</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428989</guid>
		<description>If so, you are completely useless, even in a nerd conference. :P

And &quot;The one&quot;, I don&#039;t state anywhere that he posted it at the very first μs.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>If so, you are completely useless, even in a nerd conference. <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' /> </p>
<p>And &#8220;The one&#8221;, I don&#8217;t state anywhere that he posted it at the very first μs.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sauer kraut</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428965</link>
		<dc:creator>sauer kraut</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 15:02:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428965</guid>
		<description>not yet</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>not yet</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SpacePir8</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428902</link>
		<dc:creator>SpacePir8</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:40:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428902</guid>
		<description>MILF?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>MILF?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: polaine</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428823</link>
		<dc:creator>polaine</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 14:18:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428823</guid>
		<description>Last.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: JorgeBi-otch</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428276</link>
		<dc:creator>JorgeBi-otch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 04:33:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428276</guid>
		<description>gotta keep the kid distracted somehow while mommy plays hide the gopher</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>gotta keep the kid distracted somehow while mommy plays hide the gopher</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Alex</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428244</link>
		<dc:creator>Alex</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:51:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428244</guid>
		<description>Bigger fail:

http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000FERL1M

Scroll down, look at the section marked &quot;Similar Items Available at External Websites&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bigger fail:</p>
<p><a href="http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000FERL1M" rel="nofollow">http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000FERL1M</a></p>
<p>Scroll down, look at the section marked &#8220;Similar Items Available at External Websites&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kurisutsure</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428224</link>
		<dc:creator>Kurisutsure</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428224</guid>
		<description>...someone must&#039;ve thought this would get them pregnant...?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230;someone must&#8217;ve thought this would get them pregnant&#8230;?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swell foop</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428222</link>
		<dc:creator>swell foop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:27:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428222</guid>
		<description>Was it everything you&#039;d hoped for?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Was it everything you&#8217;d hoped for?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Imactuallyachelseafcfan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428210</link>
		<dc:creator>Imactuallyachelseafcfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 02:05:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428210</guid>
		<description>18, that&#039;s a fact.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>18, that&#8217;s a fact.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: atomicslug</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428204</link>
		<dc:creator>atomicslug</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:45:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428204</guid>
		<description>The thing that&#039;s &lt;i&gt;really&lt;/i&gt; frightening is the &quot;1 more buying choice at $10.07&quot;.  Since it&#039;s so much cheaper than the original price, does that mean someone is selling it &lt;b&gt;used&lt;/b&gt;?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The thing that&#8217;s <i>really</i> frightening is the &#8220;1 more buying choice at $10.07&#8243;.  Since it&#8217;s so much cheaper than the original price, does that mean someone is selling it <b>used</b>?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: swell foop</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428200</link>
		<dc:creator>swell foop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:33:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428200</guid>
		<description>... and I quote:  &quot;3) I am not a troll; I have never before posted comments that are inappropriate/inflammatory/just plain annoying.&quot;

So, how might we classify this one, Gone2?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; and I quote:  &#8220;3) I am not a troll; I have never before posted comments that are inappropriate/inflammatory/just plain annoying.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, how might we classify this one, Gone2?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: SM</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428193</link>
		<dc:creator>SM</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 20 May 2009 01:12:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428193</guid>
		<description>Is it Amazon? Even YouTube (related videos) has that type of fail.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Is it Amazon? Even YouTube (related videos) has that type of fail.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherrypop</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428152</link>
		<dc:creator>cherrypop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:33:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428152</guid>
		<description>Damn, guess I am not boohoo!!1</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Damn, guess I am not boohoo!!1</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: cherrypop</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428151</link>
		<dc:creator>cherrypop</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:31:32 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428151</guid>
		<description>I am GAY!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I am GAY!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: King Mykul</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2009/05/19/related-purchase-fail/#comment-428149</link>
		<dc:creator>King Mykul</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 19 May 2009 23:28:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=18829#comment-428149</guid>
		<description>Yes.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
