Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.
 

« Previous | Next »

Related Purchase Fail


fail owned pwned pictures

Submitted by Peter S

Incorrect source or offensive?

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 277 Failures in Communication

  1. Oh Naaah says:

    It’s just Benjimen Button.

  2. Gone2thedogs says:

    FIRST!

    • Wicked Norwegian violin-playing United Fan says:

      can’t help myself… when i see that picture i’ve just got to ask: did Liverpool win anything intersting this year?

      • Gone2thedogs says:

        Yes, we did beat Manchester United home and away in the league, including a 4-1 victory at Old Trafford. It’s a pity you cannot win the league even with just 2 losses all season compared to Manchester United’s four.

        • ♂Krisstaar says:

          So… It’s really a ‘no’ then.

          Indeed, it’s a pity that there’s structure and logic in the ranking system. It’s so annoying that the best team always wins…

    • swell foop says:

      Was it everything you’d hoped for?

  3. Samay says:

    Damn. missed it.

    • Gone2thedogs says:

      You are third actually. I am the one who just missed it (Even though both the first user and my comment box says posted on 1:02 am.

      • JasonK says:

        That doesn’t mean you posted it at the exact same time.

        One minute is an area of 60 seconds, so your chace of posting this at the same time he did decreases down to an approximate 1.7%.

        Now, one second is, if I am not mistaken, 1000 miliseconds, so of that 1,7% chance you have, only 0.001% of that would fall upon the exact milisecond the guy above posted it. So that means you have a 0.0017% chance of posting this at the same time he did.

        But as we know, 1ms = 1000μs, which makes your chances decrease even more down to 0,0000017% chance of posting it at the same time that guy did.

        So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.

        In other words…(fail)^1000

        • t3hOutlaw says:

          That comment is full of f*cking WIN.

        • Gone2thedogs says:

          Math Show-Off Fail.

          • JasonK says:

            Yeah, sorry about that, it’s 99.9999983%.

            But really, this is pure statistics, I ain’t talking, math and logic talks, and both of them have agreed that you FAIL.

            • blossomawesome says:

              agreed. fist(r)s are failers.
              gone2thedogs, i swear if you say i don’t know how to say first, you will be dubbed a TOTAL troll. it’s related to an earlier fail, i know trolls have a short memory.

              • Gone2thedogs says:

                Clarifications:
                1) I am no big fan of saying ‘first’ on a new fail. However, seeing many others do it and seemingly enjoy themselves made me want to experience it once. Its a pity that I just missed it. Having woken up at 4 AM EDT (7 AM PDT), I was anxious to get off to a good start after my inability to sleep longer.

                2) I don’t care what you say about fist(r)s. I do not know of any such fails even though I have been visiting failblog for months. I do not care in any case if the fail you are referring to is some kind of in-joke.

                3) I am not a troll; I have never before posted comments that are inappropriate/inflammatory/just plain annoying.

                4) I understand that most people hate those who say ‘first’, especially if (s)he wasn’t, but making fun of such users almost like its a blood sport is the classic ‘man bites dog’ story.

        • blossomawesome says:

          ….. you are terrific. i shall hug you. you are a logical winner.

          • Gone2thedogs says:

            He is useless, except in a nerd conference.

            • JasonK says:

              If so, you are completely useless, even in a nerd conference. :P

              And “The one”, I don’t state anywhere that he posted it at the very first μs.

              • BRING BACK THE INTRO!!! says:

                The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond, just that it was the same time rounded to the nearest minute. Your self-congratulatory mathematics lesson proves you have nothing better to do than making fun of others online. Knowing how to divide one hundred percent by one million microseconds does not make you a legend on Failblog or anywhere else.

                • JasonK says:

                  I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0, so saying “I posted it at the same minute he did” proves nothing.

                  And I never said anything about becoming a failblog legend. And what, be praised by little minded like you? LOL, dipshit.

                  • Gone2thedogs says:

                    My comment (See above): “I am the one who just missed it”.

                    Your response: “So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.”

                    “Just missed it” does not equal “I posted at the same time”. Comprehension FAIL on your part.

                    My comment: “The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond..”

                    Your comment:”I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0″.

                    Yes, I know it is. It is still unclear to me why you tried to show me this since I NEVER claimed that I had posted at the same time (to the nearest microsecond). Any one with a calculator can figure out that the probability of two persons posting on the same forum at the same time (to the nearest microsecond) is 0.0000017%. What did you ever gain from posting this? All you are trying to do is render false an assertion that I never made. Nothing was gained from your hard work except the obvious fact that you were trying to show-off number crunching, and going with the flow in bashing someone who lamented that he was just a little too late to be the first poster.

                  • Gone2thedogs says:

                    You seem to suffer from not knowing what “degree of accuracy” means. You have never disproved that I posted at the same minute (time rounded to the nearest minute). All you have proven is that it is unlikely (though not impossible) that I posted at the same microsecond (time rounded to the nearest microsecond). There is a massive difference.

                    If I say I can run the 100m at the same time as Usain Bolt, accurate to the nearest second, all this means is that I can run the 100m in 10 seconds or less. This is not the same as claiming that I can run the 100m in 9.69s (which, you will notice, is accurate to the nearest hundredth of a second).

                    Also, your English leaves much to be desired. ” And what, be praised by little minded like you?” is not only grammatically dubious, but has no noun to go with the “little-minded” adjective, so I will never know what “little-minded ” you think I am.

                  • Gone2thedogs says:

                    Also, the comment made by The One is valid. Using my 100m race analogy, if you run the 100m in 9.50 seconds, and I claim that I can run the 100m between 9.00 and 9.99 seconds inclusive, then the probability of me running the race in 9.50 seconds is 0.01 or 1% (i.e. 99% certainty my time is not the same as yours). This says nothing about whether I crossed the finish line before or after you. All it says is that is 99% unlikely that we had the same time.

                    In order for it to be 99% certain that my time is slower than yours, you would have to have run the 100m in 9.00 seconds (right at the top of the range) and I would then have a 99% chance of running 100m between 9.01 and 9.99s.

                    In our example, Oh Naaah! posted his comment at some point between 1 hour, 2 minutes, 0 seconds, 0 milliseconds and 0 microseconds and 1 hour, 2 minutes, 59 seconds, 999 milliseconds and 999 microseconds after midnight. The likelihood of me posting somewhere in this range, but not at the exact same microsecond as Oh Naaah, is, as you calculated, 99.9999983%. This in itself does not say anything about whether I was slower or not. The value you calculated is only valid for a random point of time in the interval mentioned, and only calculates the probability of me posting around, but not exactly at the same time, as Oh Naaah.

                    Hence, your comments prove nothing. Your logic is flawed, and, as we say, you didn’t even report your answer correctly the first time. Hence, you would fail massively at a nerd conference, and, if I have the fortune of being at the same event, would expose how utterly ignorant and self-righteous a person you are.

                    • Gone2thedogs says:

                      Sentence above should read: Your logic is flawed, and, as we saw, you didn’t even report your answer correctly the first time.

                      Sorry about the typo.

                      • Hannatude says:

                        Are…Are you Mr. Spock? Because… *Sniff* I haven’t seen nor heard a logical statement that beautiful since the last episode of Star Trek (the original series)

                        • Gone2thedogs says:

                          Regardless of whether you are being sincere or sarcastic (and there is a lot of sarcasm going on on this website), I am glad that at least someone responded to my comments. Notice how JasonK never returned to argue his case. The site is full of “regulars” who are offended at the slightest matters, but who aren’t nearly as intelligent as they claim to be. What is worse, I got labeled a troll for disagreeing with “regulars”, whereas a “regular” got away with calling me “dipshit”. Hypocrisy galore!

        • The one says:

          If you consider 60 seconds in a minute, the first guy would have posted his comment at the very first μs of 1:02 am…
          So you are wrong…

  4. Sidhe Cat says:

    Baby plays with the balls while mom plays with the bat.

  5. Arthur Eld says:

    That figures – you have kids, your sex life therefore died and you need a vibrator. No fail here.

  6. Aja says:

    Yay, now my shampoo will not go to waist.

  7. Dorkalork says:

    I’d be more weirded out if it said you could buy it new or used.

  8. Incontheevable says:

    For stimulating young minds.

  9. kräut says:

    Number of single Parents is increasing, so where is the fail?

  10. Single mom win? Lets just hope the packages didn’t get mixed up…

  11. Sidhe Cat says:

    So this is only for Japanese G-spots?
    *pouts*
    .
    (Took ‘clicky’ out, so now maybe my posts won’t get eaten.)

  12. Captain Longshot says:

    Amen to single Mums!

  13. Omnes_Servos says:

    Play ‘n’ Learn?

    (Mornin’ everyone)

  14. Maca says:

    There’s a share your own customer image link *shudders*

  15. goga says:

    Some single mother bought both. No surprise here

  16. Brian Wilson says:

    ♪ She’s picking up good vibrations ♪

  17. Sidhe Cat says:

    ♪Mama’s got a squeeze box ♪

  18. Phaet says:

    Those customers are sick

  19. Is FailBlog dead? No new comments..? No, No, No Moomin? No everyone? *sniff*
    Nohooohooooboooohoooo! *Cries*

  20. Crystal says:

    Clearly purchased as a pregnancy prevention measure. She didn’t want another one!

  21. Suraki939 says:

    i dont get it.. what the hell is that thing?

  22. puppatoons says:

    Had kid, daddy left, gotta entertain yourself somehow.

  23. MrDinosaurus says:

    I would say these items are related also.

    I can easily imagine a new mother feeling the urge to satify herself when her husband no loner wants her.

    Apparently it’s like a fisherman’s bucket afterwards, nasty.

  24. Obligated says:

    Hmmm, what does Peter S. do with that purchase?

  25. Frank says:

    Oh I don’t know… something to keep the little nipper busy while the first item is… enjoyed. :-)

  26. Bip-D-Bo says:

    I think I have both those items in my house.

  27. Koki Kariya says:

    Some bored housewife found it while searching for chirstmas presents?

  28. blah says:

    my penis.

  29. nutjob says:

    “Go play with yer new toy, Junior!! Daddy’s busy right now!!”

    Why does everyone assume a woman bought the two items? Just asking…

  30. Aja says:

    Some mothers do ‘ave ‘em.

  31. Paul says:

    Wait… women can be mothers, -OR- sexual, but not both?

    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna-whore_complex

  32. Hotdoggable says:

    Moms use Vibs too. Hubby tired!

  33. hblahh says:

    Notice how the related purchase coincidentally happens to be called the “BALLTIVITY CENTER”?

    Perfect!

  34. Centerfolds says:

    I guess Moms need to get off too!

  35. Dan says:

    It really should be a combo deal, already.

  36. P.A.S. says:

    did anyone notice the second fail in the picture?

    it says the price is 17,34 while below it says: “1 buying option: 10,07″ i believe that is somewhat confusing

    • slupine says:

      Sometimes people will take the higher-priced option if it is from a more reputable seller. I do that sometimes.

  37. Dave says:

    I beg to differ. This is a win. The baby gets a toy that keeps him busy while mommy is busy with her new toy.

  38. buckinarut says:

    I think it’s a win too. Ya see, if you ladies play with Doc Johnson and get anywhere near his Ball-tivity Center, yer gonna wind up, after a little bit of a waiting period, with something that’s going to be Busy in Playskool. Maybe if you get one of these items, you get the other automatically on lay-away.

  39. slupine says:

    Maybe they have a kid, then buy the sex toy to avoid sex to not have another one? O.o

    I dunno, I’m reaching here. lol

  40. Who ever posts nexts iz GAY says:

    Who ever posts nexts iz GAY!

  41. cherrypop says:

    I am GAY!

  42. cherrypop says:

    Damn, guess I am not boohoo!!1

  43. SM says:

    Is it Amazon? Even YouTube (related videos) has that type of fail.

  44. atomicslug says:

    The thing that’s really frightening is the “1 more buying choice at $10.07″. Since it’s so much cheaper than the original price, does that mean someone is selling it used?

  45. Kurisutsure says:

    …someone must’ve thought this would get them pregnant…?

  46. Alex says:

    Bigger fail:

    http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000FERL1M

    Scroll down, look at the section marked “Similar Items Available at External Websites”.

  47. JorgeBi-otch says:

    gotta keep the kid distracted somehow while mommy plays hide the gopher

  48. Shillaqueen says:

    When did amazon.com start selling sex aids? Was this a desperate act on their part because of the economic crisis or did Hugh Hefner buy out amazon or something?

  49. Z says:

    Moms need toys too!

  50. i club seals says:

    1. What are you doing looking at the “thing” anyway?

  51. hartog says:

    This is not a fail. It’s a modern day mom WIN!

  52. DFL says:

    Sometimes, products are made TOO realistic.

  53. ALL YOUR BASE ARE BELONG TO US says:

    did he die?

  54. josh says:

    good thing the price of the other option (10.07) and the price of the baby toy pictured (30.00) matches….. FAKE FAIL

  55. Lawl says:

    Photoshopped am i right?

  56. Rob says:

    This website should list itself as FAIL. Why is a didlo and a child’s toy a FAIL? Parents arent allowed to enjoy themselves or get adventurous/kinky?

  57. Mwahohoho says:

    Mom needs toys too

  58. Chris says:

    I think the better fail would be the other way around… If those that bought the vibrator bought the baby toy it would follow reflexively that those who bought the baby toy bought the Vibrator so, just saying if you were shopping for baby toys and an “adult toy” showed up in the Recommended Products I think that would be a better Fail…

  59. lolol says:

    “Submitted by Peter S”

    so what was you planning on doing with it once you bought it peter?

  60. Arden says:

    What makes me laugh more is the fact that the person that came across this was actually looking to buy one of these.


Your Comment

 

 

Search

Daily Shipments of Fail via Email


EmailSubscribe
Enter your email address:
 

TwitterFollow us
on Twitter »
FacebookBecome a
Facebook fan »
RSSRSS Feed »
  • Tags

  • Pictures by Month

  • Recent Comments

    Judy on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    OriginalName on Making mom and dad so pro…
    dragonsrule-89 on They might be pirates
    Dragonwriter on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    Mamasalama on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    Bugs Bunny on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    Dragonwriter on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    Mamasalama on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    Larry B. on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
    Kevin on Mmmm, unprocessed french …
  • RSS Cheezburger Network Blog

  • Even More Lulz