Yes, we did beat Manchester United home and away in the league, including a 4-1 victory at Old Trafford. It’s a pity you cannot win the league even with just 2 losses all season compared to Manchester United’s four.
That doesn’t mean you posted it at the exact same time.
One minute is an area of 60 seconds, so your chace of posting this at the same time he did decreases down to an approximate 1.7%.
Now, one second is, if I am not mistaken, 1000 miliseconds, so of that 1,7% chance you have, only 0.001% of that would fall upon the exact milisecond the guy above posted it. So that means you have a 0.0017% chance of posting this at the same time he did.
But as we know, 1ms = 1000μs, which makes your chances decrease even more down to 0,0000017% chance of posting it at the same time that guy did.
So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.
agreed. fist(r)s are failers.
gone2thedogs, i swear if you say i don’t know how to say first, you will be dubbed a TOTAL troll. it’s related to an earlier fail, i know trolls have a short memory.
Clarifications:
1) I am no big fan of saying ‘first’ on a new fail. However, seeing many others do it and seemingly enjoy themselves made me want to experience it once. Its a pity that I just missed it. Having woken up at 4 AM EDT (7 AM PDT), I was anxious to get off to a good start after my inability to sleep longer.
2) I don’t care what you say about fist(r)s. I do not know of any such fails even though I have been visiting failblog for months. I do not care in any case if the fail you are referring to is some kind of in-joke.
3) I am not a troll; I have never before posted comments that are inappropriate/inflammatory/just plain annoying.
4) I understand that most people hate those who say ‘first’, especially if (s)he wasn’t, but making fun of such users almost like its a blood sport is the classic ‘man bites dog’ story.
The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond, just that it was the same time rounded to the nearest minute. Your self-congratulatory mathematics lesson proves you have nothing better to do than making fun of others online. Knowing how to divide one hundred percent by one million microseconds does not make you a legend on Failblog or anywhere else.
I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0, so saying “I posted it at the same minute he did” proves nothing.
And I never said anything about becoming a failblog legend. And what, be praised by little minded like you? LOL, dipshit.
My comment (See above): “I am the one who just missed it”.
Your response: “So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.”
“Just missed it” does not equal “I posted at the same time”. Comprehension FAIL on your part.
My comment: “The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond..”
Your comment:”I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0″.
Yes, I know it is. It is still unclear to me why you tried to show me this since I NEVER claimed that I had posted at the same time (to the nearest microsecond). Any one with a calculator can figure out that the probability of two persons posting on the same forum at the same time (to the nearest microsecond) is 0.0000017%. What did you ever gain from posting this? All you are trying to do is render false an assertion that I never made. Nothing was gained from your hard work except the obvious fact that you were trying to show-off number crunching, and going with the flow in bashing someone who lamented that he was just a little too late to be the first poster.
You seem to suffer from not knowing what “degree of accuracy” means. You have never disproved that I posted at the same minute (time rounded to the nearest minute). All you have proven is that it is unlikely (though not impossible) that I posted at the same microsecond (time rounded to the nearest microsecond). There is a massive difference.
If I say I can run the 100m at the same time as Usain Bolt, accurate to the nearest second, all this means is that I can run the 100m in 10 seconds or less. This is not the same as claiming that I can run the 100m in 9.69s (which, you will notice, is accurate to the nearest hundredth of a second).
Also, your English leaves much to be desired. ” And what, be praised by little minded like you?” is not only grammatically dubious, but has no noun to go with the “little-minded” adjective, so I will never know what “little-minded ” you think I am.
Also, the comment made by The One is valid. Using my 100m race analogy, if you run the 100m in 9.50 seconds, and I claim that I can run the 100m between 9.00 and 9.99 seconds inclusive, then the probability of me running the race in 9.50 seconds is 0.01 or 1% (i.e. 99% certainty my time is not the same as yours). This says nothing about whether I crossed the finish line before or after you. All it says is that is 99% unlikely that we had the same time.
In order for it to be 99% certain that my time is slower than yours, you would have to have run the 100m in 9.00 seconds (right at the top of the range) and I would then have a 99% chance of running 100m between 9.01 and 9.99s.
In our example, Oh Naaah! posted his comment at some point between 1 hour, 2 minutes, 0 seconds, 0 milliseconds and 0 microseconds and 1 hour, 2 minutes, 59 seconds, 999 milliseconds and 999 microseconds after midnight. The likelihood of me posting somewhere in this range, but not at the exact same microsecond as Oh Naaah, is, as you calculated, 99.9999983%. This in itself does not say anything about whether I was slower or not. The value you calculated is only valid for a random point of time in the interval mentioned, and only calculates the probability of me posting around, but not exactly at the same time, as Oh Naaah.
Hence, your comments prove nothing. Your logic is flawed, and, as we say, you didn’t even report your answer correctly the first time. Hence, you would fail massively at a nerd conference, and, if I have the fortune of being at the same event, would expose how utterly ignorant and self-righteous a person you are.
Are…Are you Mr. Spock? Because… *Sniff* I haven’t seen nor heard a logical statement that beautiful since the last episode of Star Trek (the original series)
Regardless of whether you are being sincere or sarcastic (and there is a lot of sarcasm going on on this website), I am glad that at least someone responded to my comments. Notice how JasonK never returned to argue his case. The site is full of “regulars” who are offended at the slightest matters, but who aren’t nearly as intelligent as they claim to be. What is worse, I got labeled a troll for disagreeing with “regulars”, whereas a “regular” got away with calling me “dipshit”. Hypocrisy galore!
That, or the data the recommendation is based on is not real. I once read about a similar case where an online DVD rental service kept recommending a porn DVD and a Disney movie together because that was what the automated test scripts ordered, and the test data ended up in the data mining database the recommendations are based on.
A similar thing happened at Amazon, where some obscure management book from the 60s became a virtual bestseller and was even reprinted, all based on test orders.
*Ahem* You are a woman.
To paraphrase you on more than one occasion in the past… ‘I have big tits and carry a gun; what’s ladylike about that’ ‘I’m no lady!’… ‘They keep calling me a lady!’ …etc…
.
*roffles roffles roffles*
*squueeeezes jam*
I looked manly? Hmm… I thought I looked graceful.
.
(Hint: ‘Sidhe’ is pronounced shee and means faery. Also, if you say it…’shee cat,’ that kinda tells you I’m a ’she.’)
Hush Hairy!
*tapes Hairy’s mouth shut*
Yes, yes, it’s wunerful! We LOVE the new Failblog; especially the 300-barrier being gone!
Yessss, my Precioussss!!!
*rips of the tape* f*ck! my mustache!
I don’t like the the borders!!
.
I’m getting balder everyday on FailBlog
The 300border being gone is absolutely tarriffic!
And possibly make the area a bit wider, I mean on very low resolutions it’s probably fine, but the text area only takes up about 1/4 of my screen, horizontally speaking, and if I zoom in anymore the text gets too big!
But I am on an LCD! My resolution is an extremely average 1280 x 1024. Even on 800 x 600 it’s only uses about 1/3 of my screen! And anyone still using 640 x 480 really needs an upgrade!
As for your comment on the other fail: I read the Onion article posted by someone else. I have read hundreds of other articles from The Onion. I have watched most of their videos on YouTube. At the end of all this, my conclusion is that I don’t find their brand of humor appealing. Hence I opined that “The Onion is lame.” I see nothing about posting such a comment that makes me a troll. Are you saying I am not entitled to my opinion? Its obvious who is trying to put down who in this case.
As to your assertion that I should try to come up with something marginally clever, I would like to ask what is so clever about comments like: “Morning!”, “Hiya!” and *squeeze* that comprises perhaps two-thirds of the content on Failblog’s comments pages? Just because they are not critical about someone or something does not mean they are the only acceptable types of comments on Failblog. If anything, they serve as reminders of the inherent cliqueishness and acknowledgment of the shared inward-looking attitudes of Failblog “regulars”. (Which is a nonsensical term because I have made checking the blog for new fails and voting on prospective ones part of my daily routine).
I’ll censor it and post it here:
They thought I was smuggling coca.. They arrested me and gave me 12
hours of beatings every day to make me confess.. I never did, because I was
innocent! When they released me they told me to go back to my
‘middle-east’ I have never been there.. I’m from Holland.
I’m not particularly fond of the USA myself, but there are decent people living there who would get caught in the crossfire of a bombing. And besides, bombing random people based on their nationality (or supposed one, illegal immigrants, tourists, exchange students, etc.) would make you just like the state that persecuted you!
ooooooh! I didn’t get it.. TAKE 2!
A comment like that makes me feel like giving a lot of Americans a strong
lesson on morality and logics.
aaaaaaaAAAND CUT!
How was that Steven?
They thought I was smuggling cocaine.. They arrested me and gave me 12
hours of beatings every day to make me confess.. I never did, because I was
innocent! When they released me they told me to go back to my
‘middle-east’ I have never been there.. I’m from Holland.
.
Was that good enough?
I think it’s a win too. Ya see, if you ladies play with Doc Johnson and get anywhere near his Ball-tivity Center, yer gonna wind up, after a little bit of a waiting period, with something that’s going to be Busy in Playskool. Maybe if you get one of these items, you get the other automatically on lay-away.
The thing that’s really frightening is the “1 more buying choice at $10.07″. Since it’s so much cheaper than the original price, does that mean someone is selling it used?
When did amazon.com start selling sex aids? Was this a desperate act on their part because of the economic crisis or did Hugh Hefner buy out amazon or something?
I think the better fail would be the other way around… If those that bought the vibrator bought the baby toy it would follow reflexively that those who bought the baby toy bought the Vibrator so, just saying if you were shopping for baby toys and an “adult toy” showed up in the Recommended Products I think that would be a better Fail…
It’s just Benjimen Button.
Oh wait… I thought it said that was the person who bought it.
LOL!
may I add?
FAIL
You may not.
thanks for asking anyway, though
I don’t think this is a fail… have you ever had a baby in the house? Time is of the essence.
It’s just more efficient to do it yourself! Git’er Done!
These Ustomers wouldn’t have had to buy the Ball-Tivity center if Doc Johnson did his job right!
People with babies need orgasms too!:)
The g-spot doesnt even excess i think i will add
exist****
What Z said.
Just ’cause you can’t find it doesn’t mean it’s not there.
wow I feel sorry for your gf LOL
Its Benjamin, not Benjimen.
FIRST!
can’t help myself… when i see that picture i’ve just got to ask: did Liverpool win anything intersting this year?
Yes, we did beat Manchester United home and away in the league, including a 4-1 victory at Old Trafford. It’s a pity you cannot win the league even with just 2 losses all season compared to Manchester United’s four.
So… It’s really a ‘no’ then.
Indeed, it’s a pity that there’s structure and logic in the ranking system. It’s so annoying that the best team always wins…
Its also a pity that liverpool can draw 7 times at home compared to the 2 draws at OT
18, that’s a fact.
test
How did your test go? Did you pass?
Was it everything you’d hoped for?
Damn. missed it.
You are third actually. I am the one who just missed it (Even though both the first user and my comment box says posted on 1:02 am.
That doesn’t mean you posted it at the exact same time.
One minute is an area of 60 seconds, so your chace of posting this at the same time he did decreases down to an approximate 1.7%.
Now, one second is, if I am not mistaken, 1000 miliseconds, so of that 1,7% chance you have, only 0.001% of that would fall upon the exact milisecond the guy above posted it. So that means you have a 0.0017% chance of posting this at the same time he did.
But as we know, 1ms = 1000μs, which makes your chances decrease even more down to 0,0000017% chance of posting it at the same time that guy did.
So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.
In other words…(fail)^1000
That’s nerd as balls.
or ball-tivity?
balls must be pretty nerdy
That comment is full of f*cking WIN.
Math Show-Off Fail.
Yeah, sorry about that, it’s 99.9999983%.
But really, this is pure statistics, I ain’t talking, math and logic talks, and both of them have agreed that you FAIL.
agreed. fist(r)s are failers.
gone2thedogs, i swear if you say i don’t know how to say first, you will be dubbed a TOTAL troll. it’s related to an earlier fail, i know trolls have a short memory.
Clarifications:
1) I am no big fan of saying ‘first’ on a new fail. However, seeing many others do it and seemingly enjoy themselves made me want to experience it once. Its a pity that I just missed it. Having woken up at 4 AM EDT (7 AM PDT), I was anxious to get off to a good start after my inability to sleep longer.
2) I don’t care what you say about fist(r)s. I do not know of any such fails even though I have been visiting failblog for months. I do not care in any case if the fail you are referring to is some kind of in-joke.
3) I am not a troll; I have never before posted comments that are inappropriate/inflammatory/just plain annoying.
4) I understand that most people hate those who say ‘first’, especially if (s)he wasn’t, but making fun of such users almost like its a blood sport is the classic ‘man bites dog’ story.
Sorry that should be 1AM PDT.
….. you are terrific. i shall hug you. you are a logical winner.
He is useless, except in a nerd conference.
If so, you are completely useless, even in a nerd conference.
And “The one”, I don’t state anywhere that he posted it at the very first μs.
The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond, just that it was the same time rounded to the nearest minute. Your self-congratulatory mathematics lesson proves you have nothing better to do than making fun of others online. Knowing how to divide one hundred percent by one million microseconds does not make you a legend on Failblog or anywhere else.
I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0, so saying “I posted it at the same minute he did” proves nothing.
And I never said anything about becoming a failblog legend. And what, be praised by little minded like you? LOL, dipshit.
My comment (See above): “I am the one who just missed it”.
Your response: “So don’t be so sure that you posted it at the same time Oh Naaah did. 99.999983% you posted it after him.”
“Just missed it” does not equal “I posted at the same time”. Comprehension FAIL on your part.
My comment: “The fact is, I never claimed we posted at the exact same microsecond..”
Your comment:”I wanted to show you that the chance of posting AT THE SAME TIME he does in the SAME minute is amazingly close to 0″.
Yes, I know it is. It is still unclear to me why you tried to show me this since I NEVER claimed that I had posted at the same time (to the nearest microsecond). Any one with a calculator can figure out that the probability of two persons posting on the same forum at the same time (to the nearest microsecond) is 0.0000017%. What did you ever gain from posting this? All you are trying to do is render false an assertion that I never made. Nothing was gained from your hard work except the obvious fact that you were trying to show-off number crunching, and going with the flow in bashing someone who lamented that he was just a little too late to be the first poster.
You seem to suffer from not knowing what “degree of accuracy” means. You have never disproved that I posted at the same minute (time rounded to the nearest minute). All you have proven is that it is unlikely (though not impossible) that I posted at the same microsecond (time rounded to the nearest microsecond). There is a massive difference.
If I say I can run the 100m at the same time as Usain Bolt, accurate to the nearest second, all this means is that I can run the 100m in 10 seconds or less. This is not the same as claiming that I can run the 100m in 9.69s (which, you will notice, is accurate to the nearest hundredth of a second).
Also, your English leaves much to be desired. ” And what, be praised by little minded like you?” is not only grammatically dubious, but has no noun to go with the “little-minded” adjective, so I will never know what “little-minded ” you think I am.
Also, the comment made by The One is valid. Using my 100m race analogy, if you run the 100m in 9.50 seconds, and I claim that I can run the 100m between 9.00 and 9.99 seconds inclusive, then the probability of me running the race in 9.50 seconds is 0.01 or 1% (i.e. 99% certainty my time is not the same as yours). This says nothing about whether I crossed the finish line before or after you. All it says is that is 99% unlikely that we had the same time.
In order for it to be 99% certain that my time is slower than yours, you would have to have run the 100m in 9.00 seconds (right at the top of the range) and I would then have a 99% chance of running 100m between 9.01 and 9.99s.
In our example, Oh Naaah! posted his comment at some point between 1 hour, 2 minutes, 0 seconds, 0 milliseconds and 0 microseconds and 1 hour, 2 minutes, 59 seconds, 999 milliseconds and 999 microseconds after midnight. The likelihood of me posting somewhere in this range, but not at the exact same microsecond as Oh Naaah, is, as you calculated, 99.9999983%. This in itself does not say anything about whether I was slower or not. The value you calculated is only valid for a random point of time in the interval mentioned, and only calculates the probability of me posting around, but not exactly at the same time, as Oh Naaah.
Hence, your comments prove nothing. Your logic is flawed, and, as we say, you didn’t even report your answer correctly the first time. Hence, you would fail massively at a nerd conference, and, if I have the fortune of being at the same event, would expose how utterly ignorant and self-righteous a person you are.
Sentence above should read: Your logic is flawed, and, as we saw, you didn’t even report your answer correctly the first time.
Sorry about the typo.
Are…Are you Mr. Spock? Because… *Sniff* I haven’t seen nor heard a logical statement that beautiful since the last episode of Star Trek (the original series)
Regardless of whether you are being sincere or sarcastic (and there is a lot of sarcasm going on on this website), I am glad that at least someone responded to my comments. Notice how JasonK never returned to argue his case. The site is full of “regulars” who are offended at the slightest matters, but who aren’t nearly as intelligent as they claim to be. What is worse, I got labeled a troll for disagreeing with “regulars”, whereas a “regular” got away with calling me “dipshit”. Hypocrisy galore!
If you consider 60 seconds in a minute, the first guy would have posted his comment at the very first μs of 1:02 am…
So you are wrong…
Baby plays with the balls while mom plays with the bat.
Morning!
*squeeze*
More enticing than an E.T. finger, at least.
(Morning, and *squeeze* to you, too!)
I don’t know, does the E.T. finger come in purple or red also?
No, but it does have a warming sensation.
E.T. finger glows in the dark!
so does this one,and this one vibrates
Where is Brewski?
Minding the bar, hopefully…I did leave the keys with him.
*waves* off to work..behave ya’ll
WIN!
quick question O.O if E.T. heals rifts/punctures in the skin like he did in the movies…. what would happen when his finger is applied?
well..technically not a wound, so naught to heal.
Well, so the baby can play by itself while mommy is playing with herself…
mommy loves me
MILF?
That figures – you have kids, your sex life therefore died and you need a vibrator. No fail here.
Except those two /\
As long as the batteries don’t die.
(Morning!*squeeze*)
*squeeze* Morning!
Something to keep the kid occupied while you “occupy” yourself.
Exactly! It’s clearly one of those modern hoopla pillars.
Anyone want to play Busy Balls with me?
Can I bring my E.T. finger with warming sensation?
Absolutely! We can use it as a comforter.
Then count me in!!
3… 2… 1… *applauds Crow as he comes in*
That, or the data the recommendation is based on is not real. I once read about a similar case where an online DVD rental service kept recommending a porn DVD and a Disney movie together because that was what the automated test scripts ordered, and the test data ended up in the data mining database the recommendations are based on.
A similar thing happened at Amazon, where some obscure management book from the 60s became a virtual bestseller and was even reprinted, all based on test orders.
Ah, but what has that all to do with this?
Data mining = Satan’s Work
Just sayin’…
except your comennt :3
Yay, now my shampoo will not go to waist.
Hip depends on whether you use it eggsactly as directed.
Hm, I meant to type “waste” in the un-funny connotation.
Oh well, buy one, get one free.
Don’t bogof just yet. Stay and play a while.
Play with us, Danny.
For ever, and ever, and ever?
Well, we do have a nice Jack Hammer up there! ^^
shampoo shouldn’t go to waist. shampoo go to hair.
I’d be more weirded out if it said you could buy it new or used.
For stimulating young minds.
Yes, it’s like a gingerbread house for the mind
Oh, come on! Nobody?!
nope
yeah.. no.
Number of single Parents is increasing, so where is the fail?
Single mom win? Lets just hope the packages didn’t get mixed up…
Single mom is a win?
Only if your looking for a package deal.
Free rice? Even for the pigeons?
If you can win it UN will give it.
It is if your ex is an abuser
lol, definatly
once you used up one, get another thats what i always say
So this is only for Japanese G-spots?
*pouts*
.
(Took ‘clicky’ out, so now maybe my posts won’t get eaten.)
Don’t think it worked Sidhe.
*squeeze*
Good morning all! *squeeze*
Morning!
*squeeze*
*squeezes all^^ and vv*
*enfolds*
*envelops*
*compress*
*squeeze*
That Beach Boy stole my avatar! tsk
I thought it was you.. Not? KILL HIM WITH FIRE!
*engulfs*
*Swallows*
Oof! Watch the wings, sweetie!
Okay hun,
HAHAHA… and you thought she was a boy. *snig-gers*
*rolls with jam at the hilarity of it*
Like thinking you’re a ‘lady.’ *squeeze*
I am a lady!
*Ahem* You are a woman.
To paraphrase you on more than one occasion in the past… ‘I have big tits and carry a gun; what’s ladylike about that’ ‘I’m no lady!’… ‘They keep calling me a lady!’ …etc…
.
*roffles roffles roffles*
*squueeeezes jam*
I’m Emily! Florence and I are ladies!
*flounces off*
hehe
Booyah, Little Britain!
*roffles even harder; falls to floor*
Ouch!
*squeeze*
Sorry, I couldn’t resist it.
Smiles with you, to save the moment..
* I wonder why they where laughing….*
Amen to single Mums!
Play ‘n’ Learn?
(Mornin’ everyone)
There’s a lot of pea-ness to this learning.
It’ll really get their education shaking, though.
There’s a share your own customer image link *shudders*
Some single mother bought both. No surprise here
Good thing you noticed! Nobody else did…
♪ She’s picking up good vibrations ♪
♪ she’s got the jack, and who knows what else.. ♪
♪ Rabbit, rabbit, rabbit
Why don’t she give it a rest ♪
♪ Sucking on my titties like you wanted to ♪
(couldn’t think of anything else)
*roffles*
I didn’t make up the lyrics.
Peachy!
You’re taking a dance class?
Me?! Taking a dance class! Dude! How dare you!
I am a show dancer extraordinaire!
♪Mama’s got a squeeze box ♪
Now how did that^ comment get down here? It was supposed to be up there^.
Blame Brewski!
One way or another, yes. Ha!
Give the comment your wings and tell it move up there.
*Flies comment up, keeps wings for herself*
Nice wings… For a comment-boy!
Whoops, you looked very manly carrying those comments up. Sorry!
You need to read up on LEILA’s gender discovery method.
G’nite all, off to bed. See you all tonight/tomorrow!
*squeeze*
*waves goodbye with his manly wings*
Bye *waves*
Where can i get a copy of LEILA’s method?
*flies with Crow*
Aren’t they silly sometimes? Gotta love ‘em for it!
*squeeze*
I looked manly? Hmm… I thought I looked graceful.
.
(Hint: ‘Sidhe’ is pronounced shee and means faery. Also, if you say it…’shee cat,’ that kinda tells you I’m a ’she.’)
*squeezes the shee cat*
*giggles*
Whee!
I’m afraid I’m sinning against my own rules.
Goodnight.
Those customers are sick
But it’s a good thing that E.T.’s magic finger can heal them!
Is FailBlog dead? No new comments..? No, No, No Moomin? No everyone? *sniff*
Nohooohooooboooohoooo! *Cries*
There there!
*pat pat pat*
That’s better, btw failblog’s layout changed a little.. Did you notice?
Strange things were afoot at the FailBlog last night.
Can it be true that FailBlog is about to erupt again?!
Prolly not but if you see BFF, run and hide before he pushes the button.
O.k. Do I need to bring some life vests? Just in case?
The 300-barrier is gone! Ain’t that great?
Yes it sure is! But I don’t like the borders around the avatars..
*picks nits from the Hairy monkey*
Hush Hairy!
*tapes Hairy’s mouth shut*
Yes, yes, it’s wunerful! We LOVE the new Failblog; especially the 300-barrier being gone!
Yessss, my Precioussss!!!
*rips of the tape* f*ck! my mustache!
I don’t like the the borders!!
.
I’m getting balder everyday on FailBlog
The 300border being gone is absolutely tarriffic!
And they seem to have fixed that thing where what you were typing would keep hiding behind the right hand border of the text box!
Yes, that to! But I can’t reply on your comment.. What’ that?
I click the ‘cancel reply’ button
The ‘3D’ effect around the comments rules!
I think it’s unintentional!
No way, the ones at the bottom are smaller then the ones at the
left.. This is on purpose.. In the old design is was unintentional.
I’m not a fan of the reply button being all the way up there!
yes, the nesting isn’t as elaborate.
In that case they should do it properly and blend the right hand side too.
And possibly make the area a bit wider, I mean on very low resolutions it’s probably fine, but the text area only takes up about 1/4 of my screen, horizontally speaking, and if I zoom in anymore the text gets too big!
Got to cater for the LCD, GV!
Ohh yeah same thing here.. I 1/5th of my screen is the text..
But I am on an LCD! My resolution is an extremely average 1280 x 1024. Even on 800 x 600 it’s only uses about 1/3 of my screen! And anyone still using 640 x 480 really needs an upgrade!
Pbbbt!
How? I’m working on 1600 x 1200
That’s about the same as 1280 x 1024, it’s just your aspect ratio is 16:10 instead of 4:3
No, that’s what I have here at work, 1680×1050, but I also only get about 1/4…
16:10 means it’s 16 pixels across to every 10 pixels down the screen. In other words a wide screen monitor.
With all them pixels, has your monitor been photoshopped?
I don’t see why you call it a barrier. Its broken at pretty much every fail.
Shut up.
… and I quote: “3) I am not a troll; I have never before posted comments that are inappropriate/inflammatory/just plain annoying.”
So, how might we classify this one, Gone2?
OK. Sorry. One slip on my part. Proves nothing.
As for your comment on the other fail: I read the Onion article posted by someone else. I have read hundreds of other articles from The Onion. I have watched most of their videos on YouTube. At the end of all this, my conclusion is that I don’t find their brand of humor appealing. Hence I opined that “The Onion is lame.” I see nothing about posting such a comment that makes me a troll. Are you saying I am not entitled to my opinion? Its obvious who is trying to put down who in this case.
As to your assertion that I should try to come up with something marginally clever, I would like to ask what is so clever about comments like: “Morning!”, “Hiya!” and *squeeze* that comprises perhaps two-thirds of the content on Failblog’s comments pages? Just because they are not critical about someone or something does not mean they are the only acceptable types of comments on Failblog. If anything, they serve as reminders of the inherent cliqueishness and acknowledgment of the shared inward-looking attitudes of Failblog “regulars”. (Which is a nonsensical term because I have made checking the blog for new fails and voting on prospective ones part of my daily routine).
Clearly purchased as a pregnancy prevention measure. She didn’t want another one!
A comment like that makes me feel like bombing America.
*looks askance at Hairy; raises both eyebrows*
Excuse me?
My comment is awaiting moderation..
How about:
“A comment like that makes me feel like giving the people of America a strong lesson on morality at an early age.” ?
I’ll censor it and post it here:
They thought I was smuggling coca.. They arrested me and gave me 12
hours of beatings every day to make me confess.. I never did, because I was
innocent! When they released me they told me to go back to my
‘middle-east’ I have never been there.. I’m from Holland.
I’m not particularly fond of the USA myself, but there are decent people living there who would get caught in the crossfire of a bombing. And besides, bombing random people based on their nationality (or supposed one, illegal immigrants, tourists, exchange students, etc.) would make you just like the state that persecuted you!
I wasn’t really planning on bombing anybody..
But hey, that’s cool, I apologize! Sorry all.. Hope you can forgive me for that ‘nasty’ comment.
I understand it was a joke, but since 9/11 the whole ‘bombing’ thing has been a bit of a touchy subject in America.
You’re about to get invaded.
Morning Arthur!
*waves*
*surfs*
To say the least. We’re armed with potatoes!
ooooooh! I didn’t get it.. TAKE 2!
A comment like that makes me feel like giving a lot of Americans a strong
lesson on morality and logics.
aaaaaaaAAAND CUT!
How was that Steven?
Great, you’re a natural man, a natural!
Thanks Mr. Spielberg, can I have my break now? Because I’m really getting tired.
Sure kid! Take 5 everyone!
I’m ready for my close-up!
Morality is relative. Birth control methods usually do the job pretty well.
Why? What did America ever do to you?
They thought I was smuggling cocaine.. They arrested me and gave me 12
hours of beatings every day to make me confess.. I never did, because I was
innocent! When they released me they told me to go back to my
‘middle-east’ I have never been there.. I’m from Holland.
.
Was that good enough?
Liberate from the Nazis?
And what precisely is wrong with this comment?
i dont get it.. what the hell is that thing?
I’ll tell you when you’re older.
*vibrates… uh…I mean shakes with laughter*:roll:
It’s a medical thingy for women with a nervous syndrom.
Hehe, yep
PedoPail
Had kid, daddy left, gotta entertain yourself somehow.
No Need to get so personal!!!
I would say these items are related also.
I can easily imagine a new mother feeling the urge to satify herself when her husband no loner wants her.
Apparently it’s like a fisherman’s bucket afterwards, nasty.
Hmmm, what does Peter S. do with that purchase?
Oh I don’t know… something to keep the little nipper busy while the first item is… enjoyed.
I think I have both those items in my house.
Some bored housewife found it while searching for chirstmas presents?
my penis.
Looks like you could really make a chisck happy w/ that unit
“Go play with yer new toy, Junior!! Daddy’s busy right now!!”
Why does everyone assume a woman bought the two items? Just asking…
lol, no real reason. I’d buy it.
Some mothers do ‘ave ‘em.
Wait… women can be mothers, -OR- sexual, but not both?
http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Madonna-whore_complex
the thing is can u picture both???
I thought this was the definition of MILF?
Moms use Vibs too. Hubby tired!
Notice how the related purchase coincidentally happens to be called the “BALLTIVITY CENTER”?
Perfect!
I guess Moms need to get off too!
It really should be a combo deal, already.
did anyone notice the second fail in the picture?
it says the price is 17,34 while below it says: “1 buying option: 10,07″ i believe that is somewhat confusing
Sometimes people will take the higher-priced option if it is from a more reputable seller. I do that sometimes.
I beg to differ. This is a win. The baby gets a toy that keeps him busy while mommy is busy with her new toy.
I think it’s a win too. Ya see, if you ladies play with Doc Johnson and get anywhere near his Ball-tivity Center, yer gonna wind up, after a little bit of a waiting period, with something that’s going to be Busy in Playskool. Maybe if you get one of these items, you get the other automatically on lay-away.
Maybe they have a kid, then buy the sex toy to avoid sex to not have another one? O.o
I dunno, I’m reaching here. lol
Who ever posts nexts iz GAY!
Yes.
I am GAY!
Damn, guess I am not boohoo!!1
Is it Amazon? Even YouTube (related videos) has that type of fail.
The thing that’s really frightening is the “1 more buying choice at $10.07″. Since it’s so much cheaper than the original price, does that mean someone is selling it used?
…someone must’ve thought this would get them pregnant…?
Bigger fail:
http://www.amazon.com/dp/B000FERL1M
Scroll down, look at the section marked “Similar Items Available at External Websites”.
gotta keep the kid distracted somehow while mommy plays hide the gopher
Last.
not yet
When did amazon.com start selling sex aids? Was this a desperate act on their part because of the economic crisis or did Hugh Hefner buy out amazon or something?
Moms need toys too!
Photoshop?
1. What are you doing looking at the “thing” anyway?
This is not a fail. It’s a modern day mom WIN!
Sometimes, products are made TOO realistic.
did he die?
good thing the price of the other option (10.07) and the price of the baby toy pictured (30.00) matches….. FAKE FAIL
Photoshopped am i right?
Even so, that’s hilarious–quite clever actually
if not hahaha
This website should list itself as FAIL. Why is a didlo and a child’s toy a FAIL? Parents arent allowed to enjoy themselves or get adventurous/kinky?
Mom needs toys too
I think the better fail would be the other way around… If those that bought the vibrator bought the baby toy it would follow reflexively that those who bought the baby toy bought the Vibrator so, just saying if you were shopping for baby toys and an “adult toy” showed up in the Recommended Products I think that would be a better Fail…
“Submitted by Peter S”
so what was you planning on doing with it once you bought it peter?
good info
What makes me laugh more is the fact that the person that came across this was actually looking to buy one of these.