<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Shatterproof Ornament Fail</title>
	<atom:link href="http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/</link>
	<description>Fail and Epic Fail Pictures and Videos in one blog. For all those precious fail moments, whip out your camera and see your epic fail picture and videos here.</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Fri, 19 Mar 2010 13:12:36 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Sportfx</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-754081</link>
		<dc:creator>Sportfx</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 16 Jan 2010 17:49:11 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-754081</guid>
		<description>This isnt a fail they say Shatter poof, not un-breakable</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This isnt a fail they say Shatter poof, not un-breakable</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MADNESS</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-434024</link>
		<dc:creator>MADNESS</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 May 2009 16:06:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-434024</guid>
		<description>Riiight, man.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Riiight, man.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: quiksquirl</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-412374</link>
		<dc:creator>quiksquirl</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 09 May 2009 21:08:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-412374</guid>
		<description>it is shatter proof, it didnt shatter. it only has a hole it in</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>it is shatter proof, it didnt shatter. it only has a hole it in</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Steven</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-323702</link>
		<dc:creator>Steven</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 14 Mar 2009 08:58:55 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-323702</guid>
		<description>I concur. Shatterproof is not breakproof</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I concur. Shatterproof is not breakproof</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: yazan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-320525</link>
		<dc:creator>yazan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 12 Mar 2009 08:48:03 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-320525</guid>
		<description>this is not a fail, shatterproof doesn&#039;t mean its unbreakable it just means it won&#039;t shatter and leave thousands of little tiny glass pieces everywhere which is incredibly unsafe compared to having one large broken piece.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>this is not a fail, shatterproof doesn&#8217;t mean its unbreakable it just means it won&#8217;t shatter and leave thousands of little tiny glass pieces everywhere which is incredibly unsafe compared to having one large broken piece.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bluedragon</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-300173</link>
		<dc:creator>bluedragon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 26 Feb 2009 20:05:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-300173</guid>
		<description>This is not a fail.  It says &quot;shatter proof&quot;, not &quot;break proof&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is not a fail.  It says &#8220;shatter proof&#8221;, not &#8220;break proof&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Emi</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-285072</link>
		<dc:creator>Emi</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 15 Feb 2009 05:28:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-285072</guid>
		<description>Broken not shattered.  It&#039;s fine.  XD</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Broken not shattered.  It&#8217;s fine.  XD</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Cauliflower</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-267196</link>
		<dc:creator>Cauliflower</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Feb 2009 08:38:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-267196</guid>
		<description>well, on the bright side: they didn&#039;t shatter :D
just broke.... but I see no tiny peaces of glass, so yay!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>well, on the bright side: they didn&#8217;t shatter <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_biggrin.gif' alt=':D' class='wp-smiley' /><br />
just broke&#8230;. but I see no tiny peaces of glass, so yay!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Em</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-244721</link>
		<dc:creator>Em</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 15 Jan 2009 16:12:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-244721</guid>
		<description>I was getting ready to buy almost these exact ornaments yesterday and there were just rows of shattered ones just like this. It was sad but that&#039;s what one gets for waiting for the ornaments to go on sale lol</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was getting ready to buy almost these exact ornaments yesterday and there were just rows of shattered ones just like this. It was sad but that&#8217;s what one gets for waiting for the ornaments to go on sale lol</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-239077</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:16:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-239077</guid>
		<description>you jst fail so shut up 
and btw it does say ornaments</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>you jst fail so shut up<br />
and btw it does say ornaments</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-239076</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:13:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-239076</guid>
		<description>what the hell are ordiments ?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>what the hell are ordiments ?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joel</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-239073</link>
		<dc:creator>joel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 11 Jan 2009 02:12:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-239073</guid>
		<description>how the hell is that a fail 
it broke it didn&#039;t shatter 
that fail ....fails</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>how the hell is that a fail<br />
it broke it didn&#8217;t shatter<br />
that fail &#8230;.fails</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jaera</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-236108</link>
		<dc:creator>Jaera</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 19:42:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-236108</guid>
		<description>I think you retards mistook him saying it&#039;s sad that nobody uses the word anymore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think you retards mistook him saying it&#8217;s sad that nobody uses the word anymore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pr0d1gY</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-233445</link>
		<dc:creator>Pr0d1gY</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 07 Jan 2009 03:49:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-233445</guid>
		<description>I quite agree....
It has merely been broken.....
This, however, may be entirely intentional, seeing as to how ignorant people may try to SUE them because their ornament has been broken, as such ornament is declared &quot;shatterproof&quot;. Seeing as to how it is broken rather than shattered these ornaments are still proven shatterproof and said hole is merely a way of evading certain legal affairs, until further notice.
If, for instance, a meteor were to hit the earth and a hole would become of such unfortunate events. The planet has not been shattered, it has just been damaged. Within such circumstances the planet is neither broken. However, if the meteor had caused the planet to lose it&#039;s basic shape and maintain a new form in many different shapes then the planet would, in fact, be shattered. Although the hole in the ornament has indeed made the ornament lose it&#039;s general spherical shape, you can still tell what it was once rather than it being in many pieces that would make it difficult to understand what it&#039;s general shape and purpose would be.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I quite agree&#8230;.<br />
It has merely been broken&#8230;..<br />
This, however, may be entirely intentional, seeing as to how ignorant people may try to SUE them because their ornament has been broken, as such ornament is declared &#8220;shatterproof&#8221;. Seeing as to how it is broken rather than shattered these ornaments are still proven shatterproof and said hole is merely a way of evading certain legal affairs, until further notice.<br />
If, for instance, a meteor were to hit the earth and a hole would become of such unfortunate events. The planet has not been shattered, it has just been damaged. Within such circumstances the planet is neither broken. However, if the meteor had caused the planet to lose it&#8217;s basic shape and maintain a new form in many different shapes then the planet would, in fact, be shattered. Although the hole in the ornament has indeed made the ornament lose it&#8217;s general spherical shape, you can still tell what it was once rather than it being in many pieces that would make it difficult to understand what it&#8217;s general shape and purpose would be.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: thatquietkid</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-228364</link>
		<dc:creator>thatquietkid</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 Jan 2009 05:33:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-228364</guid>
		<description>This works on 2 levels:
1. The ornaments aren&#039;t even supposed to be broken-they&#039;re still in the original packaging!
2. They&#039;re SHATTERPROOF.  Apparently, they aren&#039;t too well made.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This works on 2 levels:<br />
1. The ornaments aren&#8217;t even supposed to be broken-they&#8217;re still in the original packaging!<br />
2. They&#8217;re SHATTERPROOF.  Apparently, they aren&#8217;t too well made.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: scofield</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-228136</link>
		<dc:creator>scofield</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 02 Jan 2009 23:24:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-228136</guid>
		<description>merry christmas !</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>merry christmas !</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: that one guy</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-224707</link>
		<dc:creator>that one guy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 31 Dec 2008 00:45:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-224707</guid>
		<description>haha the same shit happened to me when i bought some ordiments at wal-mart</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>haha the same shit happened to me when i bought some ordiments at wal-mart</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kaity</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-224305</link>
		<dc:creator>Kaity</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 30 Dec 2008 16:53:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-224305</guid>
		<description>Actually, I saw a box of these in the store...and in the box that I saw, one of them _was_ shattered. Not broken, SHATTERED. Into many tiny pieces! It was the only box of ornaments left, and it was a mess.

So, this one is true. Those shatterproof ornaments DO fail! And yeah, the one I saw in the store, had the same box, label, and type of ornaments. Not joking.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Actually, I saw a box of these in the store&#8230;and in the box that I saw, one of them _was_ shattered. Not broken, SHATTERED. Into many tiny pieces! It was the only box of ornaments left, and it was a mess.</p>
<p>So, this one is true. Those shatterproof ornaments DO fail! And yeah, the one I saw in the store, had the same box, label, and type of ornaments. Not joking.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Babs</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-223564</link>
		<dc:creator>Babs</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 20:04:33 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-223564</guid>
		<description>Agree with mjc. Shatterproof means that when it does break, it isn&#039;t going to turn into a million little pieces.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Agree with mjc. Shatterproof means that when it does break, it isn&#8217;t going to turn into a million little pieces.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: strongfan</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-223164</link>
		<dc:creator>strongfan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 16:20:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-223164</guid>
		<description>So, you have a bunch of morons who use oxyclean?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>So, you have a bunch of morons who use oxyclean?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Kismet</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-222527</link>
		<dc:creator>Kismet</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 29 Dec 2008 01:32:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-222527</guid>
		<description>This is ftoooopid.  It&#039;s called shatterproof because it doesn&#039;t burst into a thousand tiny shards of pain to be picked up by your feet for the next year, no matter how well you clean.  They&#039;re plastic, and, if they break, they break into big, non-slicing chunks.  See the difference?  I reiterate what was said above as well, because I basically just said what they did, but I just noticed now, and I&#039;ve put too much damned effort into this to just delete it.  So PHBBPT!  :P  ^_^</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is ftoooopid.  It&#8217;s called shatterproof because it doesn&#8217;t burst into a thousand tiny shards of pain to be picked up by your feet for the next year, no matter how well you clean.  They&#8217;re plastic, and, if they break, they break into big, non-slicing chunks.  See the difference?  I reiterate what was said above as well, because I basically just said what they did, but I just noticed now, and I&#8217;ve put too much damned effort into this to just delete it.  So PHBBPT!  <img src='http://s.wordpress.com/wp-includes/images/smilies/icon_razz.gif' alt=':P' class='wp-smiley' />   ^_^</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Matthew</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-222387</link>
		<dc:creator>Matthew</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 23:07:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-222387</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t read before I post and I hardly read after I post. I post because it makes me feel better.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t read before I post and I hardly read after I post. I post because it makes me feel better.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hypa_kitty</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-222082</link>
		<dc:creator>hypa_kitty</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 18:35:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-222082</guid>
		<description>sorray to point it out but second as always =D black angel was first =O</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>sorray to point it out but second as always =D black angel was first =O</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ectoplasm Dude</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221942</link>
		<dc:creator>Ectoplasm Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:49:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221942</guid>
		<description>You&#039;re right, but still- the idiots aren&#039;t going to be getting much profit this year.  By the way-do YOU know what &quot;ectoplasm&quot; is?  You seem to be the smart type.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You&#8217;re right, but still- the idiots aren&#8217;t going to be getting much profit this year.  By the way-do YOU know what &#8220;ectoplasm&#8221; is?  You seem to be the smart type.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ectoplasm Dude</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221937</link>
		<dc:creator>Ectoplasm Dude</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 15:47:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221937</guid>
		<description>Hehehe-two FAILURES in One!  It says &quot;omaments&quot; down at the bottom, plus it&#039;s supposedly shatter-proof.  Exept for that first one.  Actually, I first thought it was just a reflection of light.  But indeed it is a FAILURE.  Hehehehe.
Plus-I&#039;m the only one that knows what &quot;ectoplasm&quot;is.  Idiots.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hehehe-two FAILURES in One!  It says &#8220;omaments&#8221; down at the bottom, plus it&#8217;s supposedly shatter-proof.  Exept for that first one.  Actually, I first thought it was just a reflection of light.  But indeed it is a FAILURE.  Hehehehe.<br />
Plus-I&#8217;m the only one that knows what &#8220;ectoplasm&#8221;is.  Idiots.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sabret00the</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221821</link>
		<dc:creator>sabret00the</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 13:44:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221821</guid>
		<description>Someone needs to look up the word shatter. They&#039;re broken, they&#039;re not shattered.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Someone needs to look up the word shatter. They&#8217;re broken, they&#8217;re not shattered.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Craig</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221740</link>
		<dc:creator>Craig</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 07:12:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221740</guid>
		<description>speaking of morons...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>speaking of morons&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J2800</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221699</link>
		<dc:creator>J2800</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:33:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221699</guid>
		<description>f you</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>f you</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J2800</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221697</link>
		<dc:creator>J2800</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:32:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221697</guid>
		<description>*masturbatity*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>*masturbatity*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: J2800</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221696</link>
		<dc:creator>J2800</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 05:31:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221696</guid>
		<description>You are a retard for being a noob.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>You are a retard for being a noob.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kannadzuki</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221605</link>
		<dc:creator>kannadzuki</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 02:56:52 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221605</guid>
		<description>Do you think they might need your Advanced Pre-Humo(u)r Remedial Hono(u)rs course first?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Do you think they might need your Advanced Pre-Humo(u)r Remedial Hono(u)rs course first?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: fcxds</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221548</link>
		<dc:creator>fcxds</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 02:07:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221548</guid>
		<description>Shatter is different than cracking, fail on the fail blog... get your shit straight.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Shatter is different than cracking, fail on the fail blog&#8230; get your shit straight.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Sherm</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221537</link>
		<dc:creator>Sherm</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:40:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221537</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s a gaggle of oxymorons actually.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s a gaggle of oxymorons actually.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs_Z</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221517</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs_Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 28 Dec 2008 01:12:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221517</guid>
		<description>Nah...those are gargoyle eggs and one of them has hatched early and gotten loose in the store somewhere, is all. So while you are browsing, keep an ear open for the scary music...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Nah&#8230;those are gargoyle eggs and one of them has hatched early and gotten loose in the store somewhere, is all. So while you are browsing, keep an ear open for the scary music&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: badchannelz</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221431</link>
		<dc:creator>badchannelz</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 20:38:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221431</guid>
		<description>Wait a sec... I don&#039;t think it did shatter. That&#039;s a plastic ornament with a fig bucking puncture in it. So I guess we need to find the puncture-proof ones somewhere... *keeps browsing*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wait a sec&#8230; I don&#8217;t think it did shatter. That&#8217;s a plastic ornament with a fig bucking puncture in it. So I guess we need to find the puncture-proof ones somewhere&#8230; *keeps browsing*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs_Z</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221381</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs_Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:21:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221381</guid>
		<description>I think they&#039;re sweet, too. The LOLspeak wears me out sometimes, but I&#039;m catching on rapidly. (Language is my job, after all.) I&#039;ve noticed I&#039;ve raised some hackles on the Failblog when the LOLspeak creeps in unawares, and I&#039;ve been told I like to stick my fingers in the fire to see how long it takes me to get burned. Jeez, Louise, are we going to OZ today? There is some serious ugly going on outside my kitchen window. Uh, I may need to shut down and unplug for a little while.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think they&#8217;re sweet, too. The LOLspeak wears me out sometimes, but I&#8217;m catching on rapidly. (Language is my job, after all.) I&#8217;ve noticed I&#8217;ve raised some hackles on the Failblog when the LOLspeak creeps in unawares, and I&#8217;ve been told I like to stick my fingers in the fire to see how long it takes me to get burned. Jeez, Louise, are we going to OZ today? There is some serious ugly going on outside my kitchen window. Uh, I may need to shut down and unplug for a little while.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragonwriter</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221366</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragonwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:04:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221366</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t &lt;b&gt;*FOOOM!!*&lt;/b&gt; the cheezpeeps. I think they&#039;re sweet, actually.

I just have a serious wicked streak that fits in much better here! *grin*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t <b>*FOOOM!!*</b> the cheezpeeps. I think they&#8217;re sweet, actually.</p>
<p>I just have a serious wicked streak that fits in much better here! *grin*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mrs_Z</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221360</link>
		<dc:creator>Mrs_Z</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 19:00:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221360</guid>
		<description>Okay, i can&#039;t standz it ennymores. You know, those dreaded LOLcat people could make short work of that borked orinment. *opens FIRE VALVE door, lets in the ICHC-ers* Right over here, guys--it&#039;s a splorted ornament. Clean-up on aisle five, please. 

*watches as the ICHC folks sweepys-up the borked pieces, fits them back togedders, wraps them wi/ducky tape (tapeytapeytapey), snaps on a new CHRG w/doi, wraps the ornament in a lovely cheezpeeps blankie and places it gently back in the package wif its frenzez, w/ hot choklit an concatshoelaces all round* 

*whispers* (Tankew, guys; nao better get outta here b-4 you wakes up teh Failblog an sumbuddy gitz FOOMED.)

There, lil orinment all better! *RUNS FOR DEAR LIFE*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Okay, i can&#8217;t standz it ennymores. You know, those dreaded LOLcat people could make short work of that borked orinment. *opens FIRE VALVE door, lets in the ICHC-ers* Right over here, guys&#8211;it&#8217;s a splorted ornament. Clean-up on aisle five, please. </p>
<p>*watches as the ICHC folks sweepys-up the borked pieces, fits them back togedders, wraps them wi/ducky tape (tapeytapeytapey), snaps on a new CHRG w/doi, wraps the ornament in a lovely cheezpeeps blankie and places it gently back in the package wif its frenzez, w/ hot choklit an concatshoelaces all round* </p>
<p>*whispers* (Tankew, guys; nao better get outta here b-4 you wakes up teh Failblog an sumbuddy gitz FOOMED.)</p>
<p>There, lil orinment all better! *RUNS FOR DEAR LIFE*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric-San</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221247</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric-San</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 17:01:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221247</guid>
		<description>FIRST</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>FIRST</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: The Short Bus</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221223</link>
		<dc:creator>The Short Bus</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 16:16:04 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221223</guid>
		<description>I got half way and I swear I got so confused. Can we keep it simple i can not register these long simplific sentences!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I got half way and I swear I got so confused. Can we keep it simple i can not register these long simplific sentences!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dilettante</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221187</link>
		<dc:creator>dilettante</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:39:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221187</guid>
		<description>There will be blood.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>There will be blood.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uriel</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221163</link>
		<dc:creator>Uriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:19:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221163</guid>
		<description>... ... ... I should REALLY put on my perv glasses and reread my posts before I push the button...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8230; &#8230; &#8230; I should REALLY put on my perv glasses and reread my posts before I push the button&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Ryannon</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221162</link>
		<dc:creator>Ryannon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:19:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221162</guid>
		<description>Are you one of the Little Mermaids sisters?  The one that can&#039;t control her bladder?  I heard about you and will not be inviting you to my home.  Just because you live undah da sea doesn&#039;t mean you can pee wherever you like.  Have you no decorum?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Are you one of the Little Mermaids sisters?  The one that can&#8217;t control her bladder?  I heard about you and will not be inviting you to my home.  Just because you live undah da sea doesn&#8217;t mean you can pee wherever you like.  Have you no decorum?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uriel</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221161</link>
		<dc:creator>Uriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 15:17:44 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221161</guid>
		<description>Wow how did I not see that one coming...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow how did I not see that one coming&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: shalindria</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221151</link>
		<dc:creator>shalindria</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:45:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221151</guid>
		<description>Jamie, I don&#039;t know what you&#039;re talking about. Where I live we have herds of oxymorons.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Jamie, I don&#8217;t know what you&#8217;re talking about. Where I live we have herds of oxymorons.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: EarthBoundDancer525</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221131</link>
		<dc:creator>EarthBoundDancer525</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 14:03:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221131</guid>
		<description>The only fail here is the attempt to claim a fail. The box clearly states that it is shatter proof, not unbreakable. They break, but they don&#039;t shatter into a million pieces that stab you in the foot later when you thought you&#039;ve cleaned them all up. 

And I don&#039;t care if this has already been brought up, I don&#039;t feel like reading all the posts, &#039;cause there&#039;s over a hundred I believe.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The only fail here is the attempt to claim a fail. The box clearly states that it is shatter proof, not unbreakable. They break, but they don&#8217;t shatter into a million pieces that stab you in the foot later when you thought you&#8217;ve cleaned them all up. </p>
<p>And I don&#8217;t care if this has already been brought up, I don&#8217;t feel like reading all the posts, &#8217;cause there&#8217;s over a hundred I believe.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: kittysmurf</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221104</link>
		<dc:creator>kittysmurf</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 12:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221104</guid>
		<description>lol, that happened to us!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>lol, that happened to us!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: NoOneInteresting</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221078</link>
		<dc:creator>NoOneInteresting</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 10:26:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221078</guid>
		<description>That&#039;s what she said!

(Oh, yeah.  I went there.)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>That&#8217;s what she said!</p>
<p>(Oh, yeah.  I went there.)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Uriel</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221075</link>
		<dc:creator>Uriel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 09:32:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221075</guid>
		<description>Ya know techinically this isn&#039;t a f-f-f... ... ...

ok, nevermind, I can&#039;t do it... 

Was starting to think my scroller had failed... Everytime I go down I see the same thing.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Ya know techinically this isn&#8217;t a f-f-f&#8230; &#8230; &#8230;</p>
<p>ok, nevermind, I can&#8217;t do it&#8230; </p>
<p>Was starting to think my scroller had failed&#8230; Everytime I go down I see the same thing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dragonwriter</title>
		<link>http://failblog.org/2008/12/26/shatterproof-ornament-fail/#comment-221055</link>
		<dc:creator>Dragonwriter</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 27 Dec 2008 07:33:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://failblog.org/?p=10388#comment-221055</guid>
		<description>YOU...!!!
.
...I like you.

*gives Sherpa a cookie*</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YOU&#8230;!!!<br />
.<br />
&#8230;I like you.</p>
<p>*gives Sherpa a cookie*</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
