Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.

 

« Previous Windmill Fail | Management Fail Next »

Bumper Fail


fail owned pwned pictures

Submission and photo by Julie M

Incorrect source or offensive?
Reddit This
Stumbleupon This
Post This to Facebook

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 261 Failures in Communication

  1. Beren says:

    Igenuity Win – and not a post about being first!

    • Blah says:

      or second

      • mrdobalina says:

        I can’t see how a log would make an effective bumper. The whole point of a bumper is it crushes inwards on itself and therefore leave the car less harmed…and the driver’s body come to a slightly more gradual halt.
        The whole process is supposed to be as if the car crashed into a huge pile of bubble-wrap.
        If this car crashed, however, the effect would be as if it had crashed into a tree.

        • Biff says:

          Um, no. The purpose of a bumper is to keep the car and you from being damaged at all. That is why they originally were made from solid steel. It’s only on new garbage designed cars that the bumper, and the car itself, are designed to collapse in on themselves. That why it is now possible to total a car if you hit something going ten miles an hour. Then you have to go purchase a NEW car. That is the real purpose of the new collapse technology, not safety.

          • Bumper Fan says:

            Finally someone with obvious background of long term studies in pysics, medicine and of course crashteststudies.
            The collapsing car is designed to absorb some of the impact. If the energy of a 50 km/h crash was absorbed by only your body you could be lucky if you are heavily injured.
            Old bumpers were made from solid steel because at that time engineers simply didn’t know better.

            • Malfeasant says:

              i don’t think it was because they didn’t know better, but more because cars didn’t have seatbelts then, so it didn’t really matter what the bumper did… what good is cushioning the car if you still hit the steering wheel at 40 mph? in any case, i think a log is better than nothing at all, in fact, it’s better than bad, it’s good
              everyone wants a log
              you’re gonna love it, log
              come on and get your log

              • Greenbandit says:

                Win

              • Captain Obvious says:

                It rolls down stairs
                In singles and pairs
                Rolls over your neighbor’s dog…

                • zync says:

                  What rolls down stairs,
                  Alone or in pairs,
                  Rolls over your neighbor’s dog,
                  What’s great for a snack,
                  And fit’s on your back,
                  It’s log, log, log,
                  It’s log, log,
                  It’s big, It’s heavy, it’s wood,
                  It’s log, log,
                  It’s better than bad it’s good,
                  Everyone wants a log,
                  You’re gonna love it, log,
                  Come on and get your log,
                  Everyone needs a log.
                  LOG from BLAMMO!

                  • Ineverfial says:

                    Ren & Stimpy WIN
                    and about the log…I actually got one at home^^

                  • Dalkorian says:

                    Ren and Stimpy reference – man that takes me back. Back to days I can’t remember due to excessive drug and alcohol consumption done during those days. Is that a paradox?

              • davo says:

                probably cuz there weren’t as many idiots behind the wheel back then and they didn’t have to factor in a crash happening every 3 seconds..

              • farrex says:

                This is an antique bumper
                Because the bumper had been getting better and better day by day like first was from wood, then rock, then copper, then steel, then aluminium, and now a kind of plastic with metal properties.

            • Biff says:

              I understand this far better then you do. Yes the collapsing car is designed to protect the passengers. But the switch for old solid steel to todays plastic, fiber glass, aluminum collapse cars didn’t come about in order to provide safety. It came about to make more money by building cars out of cheaper less safe materials. After the fact they realized that these cheap little death traps that crumpled up like tin foil were killing everybody. So, they designed the strategic collapse cars in an effort to make them as safe as the old steel models. In short, the collapsing car isn’t an improvement over steel, it’s a compensation for building cars out of garbage materials. The only true safety improvements since the old steel days are things like seat belts, ABS, etc.

            • Adam says:

              The very first steel bumpers were rigidly attached to the frame, and it was found that low speed impacts caused serious injury to the occupants. Engineers solved this problem with 5mph shock absorbers. The solid steel bumpers in the late 1970’s and early 1980’s were mounted with these shock absorbers. The idea was that any impact of low energy (equal to 5mph into a wall) would cause no damage to the car. The shock absorbers would burst at impacts of higher energy. Pressure to make automobiles lighter and more fuel fuel efficient forced automobile manufacturers to abandon the use of steel bumpers and the 5mph shock absorbers in favor of the crumple-zone design used today. Because of this, bumping into a pole or other car in a parking lot costs a thousand times more than with the old design. However, current advancements have made the crumple zone design relatively safe in a high energy impact. I say relatively because the crash tests are done against a wall. If you were to crash into my 1982 Oldsmobile Regency (5200 lbs) in your new 3000 lb sedan, you and your car would sustain most of the damage because my car has more intertia. The truth is auto makers could combine the crumple zone idea with a useful bumper, but cars would cost more, weigh more, and use more gasoline.

          • Rob W says:

            Wow, that’s incredibly cynical! I bet you’d even find a way to say that the airbags are only there to make you buy a new car as well!!

            New bumpers are most definitely about safety, but also about damage limitation. By letting the bumper take the force of a crash, it means that the car takes less force and the chassis and the really expensive parts of the car remain largely untouched.

            • ripple says:

              MMM MMM MMM MMM

            • Beren says:

              Having a large log as a rear bumper is probably a really good idea on a number of levels.

              First wood is compressible so it will absorb impact forces should the vehicle have an accident.

              Secondly I would not tailgate a car with a log supported by a couple of chains for a back bumper. Ergo this car is far less likely to be involved in a collision from behind.

              • the pun-isher says:

                A natural carbon-fibre fender (before we start a long thread on the names of car parts, fender=bumper over here. -starts into chorus from the musical “anything goes”-)

              • asdf says:

                I agree that I would not tailgate this car. If anything, I think I would observe their enginuity from a distance.

                However, I don’t agree with the compressibility of a “tree bumper”. A tree verses car collision usually results in a tree WIN and car FAIL.

                But this way, He always has fire wood.

                • paula says:

                  hahaha!!! i totally tailgated this car on my way to school a year ago because i was trying to get a picture of the bumper. failed at taking it myself but just crapped my pants with joy to find it here!

            • Biff says:

              No, bumpers and the entire car, with the exception of the passenger compartment, are design to crumple at very lower impact speeds thereby destroying the car. Modern cars are totaled at impacts that would barely put a dent in in the old steel models.

              • Fat Zero says:

                Yeah, these same old steel models where the engines would slam into passengers and trap them in the passenger area and force the local fire department to cut them out with the Jaws of Life while they bleed to death, sorry your conspiracy argument is not working but if you do not know anything of car manufacturing safety, some blog on the internet isn’t the place to demonstrate your interNUTS.

                • asdf says:

                  just for fun, did you know the “jaws of life” used to be called the “jaws of death” until they decided to rename them something a little less ominous. I find the original name funnier.

                  • ThyGoblinking says:

                    O RLY?

                  • Eplekongen says:

                    Trivia! Yay!

                  • You've Got Fail says:

                    Are you sure about that? Metaphorically speaking, the “jaws of death” is the life-threatening car accident itself!

                    “Jaws of death” is a VERY old literary metaphor (see below). The “jaws of life” were named that way in an ironic/humorous way as being something that gets you OUT of the Jaws of Death.

                    Shakespeare, Twelfth Night, 1601:
                    “Let me speak a little. This youth that you see here
                    I snatch’d one half out of the jaws of death…”

                    • Admiral Apparent says:

                      Cannon to right of them,
                      Cannon to left of them,
                      Cannon in front of them
                        Volley’d and thunder’d;
                      Storm’d at with shot and shell,
                      Boldly they rode and well,
                      Into the jaws of Death,
                      Into the mouth of Hell
                        Rode the six hundred.

                      Alfred, Lord Tennyson “Charge of the Light Brigade”
                      This was inspired by November 14, 1854 dispatch in the London Times, written by William Howard Russell. The poem affected the way this colossal failure was portrayed for many years.

                  • You've Got Fail says:

                    P.S. Cultural awareness FAIL

                • Biff says:

                  There was no jaws of life back then. The only thing those old cars had going against them was lack of seat belts, other then that, they were far superior to newer models. As far as conspiracies go… I never said it was a conspiracy, but I suppose you could call it that. Not much of one though. Car makers simply claim that the garbage construction of cars is a safety feature to explain why they get totaled at ten miles an hour into a pole.

              • Etcetera says:

                Srsly. This is a Subaru, in Colorado. We have lots of logs, and lots of Subarus without bumpers or fenders. What would YOU do????? Pfft.

            • Pretentious White Girl says:

              The airbags force you to buy a new car by causing you to suffocate and panic when they blow up in your face, and thereby causing you to have a panic attack every time you sit in the driver’s seat of your old car, thereby forcing you to buy a new one.

            • Bob says:

              Considering my brother while stationed in Germany bought a BMW….He could not bring it back to the states because the bumper (and other parts, but for this conversation) was TOO strong….it was made of steel, making it “unsafe” for people on the road, since they are in “garbage” materials (to use previous statements).

          • mr s.a.u.s.a.g.e says:

            Yeah, and they add something to water, so it produces rainbows…:P

          • phonono says:

            Owning a private car = automatic fail

          • GavMo says:

            It’s called ‘Planned Obsolesence’ :D

          • Pablo+ says:

            Agreed!

        • dashiznit says:

          Who’s to say it’s not a rubber tree?

        • Failer says:

          Don’t you insult nature’s bumper!!!!

    • Alex-X-x says:

      grr u deserved huge rape from me for being first!

      • ronber says:

        I envy your life.

      • Beren says:

        You are about as entertaining as a child’s inflatable punching toy. You bop it, it springs back, you bop it again and you forget it ever existed. It slowly deflates in an unused corner, then one day you throw it away. I’d get more pleasure from running my nostrils down a cactus, than reading another contribution from you. Maybe you wouldn’t read like such a pathetic loser if you weren’t an ‘idiot savant’ without the ’savant’ part; if your weren’t so fat that your cereal bowl has its own lifeguard, or if you didn’t have a face like a boiled Octopus. No, come to think of it, you would.

    • Lol says:

      OMG! Those were my exact words… Like, I was thinking I was gonna post “Ingenuity win”… and then the page loaded… and there it is in front of me.

      …creepy…

    • Spaztronomical says:

      technically you still posted about being first. but, agreed, this is a win.

    • RakureX2 says:

      Oh well, at least the car is a Subaru Outback………

  2. david says:

    touch wood nothing goes wrong

  3. poophead says:

    or third

  4. Bill says:

    This is a redneck win!

  5. Teagen says:

    that poor tree. It could have been put to a better use, like a fire.

    heehee fire. . .

  6. avalokiteshvara says:

    Fire?

    *masturbates*

  7. anon-e-mouse says:

    …why am I not surprised by the Colorado plate?

  8. pheebz says:

    7th! wow, thats a first

    heh

  9. pheebz says:

    aw. i guess im 8th

  10. Biff says:

    11th! Yes! *masturbates* Now I’m double the idiot of all you “first” masturbating posters. Lol.

  11. Elsarild says:

    Very creative

    but i doubt the effektivness of it 0.o

  12. pun-isher says:

    Ah so that’s why in the states a boot is called a trunk.

  13. ClanFever says:

    Maybe it’s Jeremy Clarkson’s car?

  14. Alex-X-x says:

    where else, then soviet russia it could be?

  15. K says:

    Seems like a natural solution in Colorado. I hear logs grow on trees, there.

  16. Vagabond says:

    Could he just be carrying a tree log?

  17. antius says:

    it’s not a bumper, but fuel. Very clever btw. Omerigans should learn how to live without gas.

  18. Sir Les Paterson says:

    Wacky Races WIN for the Arkansas Chugabug.

  19. Redstone says:

    It’s the signature bumper of the Lumber Cartel (tinlc).

  20. Johnnyboy says:

    (singing)

    “It’s lo-og, it’s lo-og, it’s big, it’s heavy, it’s wood!
    It’s better than bad, it’s good!”

  21. mr s.a.u.s.a.g.e says:

    Hmm… it looks like my morning wood.

  22. Ryan Waxx says:

    >> Wow, that’s incredibly cynical! I bet you’d even find a way to say that the airbags >> are only there to make you buy a new car as well!!

    Actually, that is exactly the effect they have. Reinstalling the airbag system can cost a couple of K nowadays, so a car that would be otherwise fine to drive but is too old for replacing the airbags to be worth it is junked nowadays because it’s cheaper for the insurance company to cut a check.

    Your sarcasm running up and smacking facefirst into reality FAIL.

  23. Ryan Waxx says:

    Scrolling up to read the quoted comment FAIL.

    • Beren says:

      Ability to Press Reply underneath Comment being quoted on, Fail.

      Failing to take a hint that you are doing it wrong, Fail.

      You sir fail at internets.

  24. jinx says:

    Maybe he’s a lumberjack, but he can’t afford a truck?

  25. hiperbato says:

    I would dare to say… BUMPER WIN!

  26. BobOfTheMountains says:

    It’s Nederland, CO. It’s a different world up here, you folks with oxygen in your air wouldn’t understand.

    Ned: A Dog for every Subaru.
    Ned: Helping put Ward in perspective for you.
    Ned: Like Boulder, but without the proximity to reality

    • fluffy says:

      *waves at Bob* Howdy neighbor!
      So you know this guy? Is it your car?
      And Nederland CO is truly a different world. Check out “Frozen Dead Guy Days”

  27. treeboy says:

    Wonder what’s the carbon signature!?

  28. weberr13 says:

    I’ve seen this one in person. The picture was taken in boulder.

  29. Onikun says:

    How is this fail? Environmentally friendly ftw! :p

  30. kelti says:

    Is that a log, or is your car just happy to see me?

  31. Aaron says:

    green bumper

  32. Donnie Mac says:

    Bumper win! That must be one tough bumper!

  33. amorphi says:

    WIN! OMG WIN!

  34. Cam says:

    240th comment WIN??????

    Nah…Wooden bumpers are W-I-N

  35. Nasonguy says:

    FTW! That’s what any rightful, nature loving, sooby owned would do!

  36. whitewater_plz says:

    it’s a subaru with a roof rack. obviously they spend a lot of time in the woods. leave people in the woods long enough and you get all kinds of weird hippie-tech, like the river-water-and-leaves gravity bong or the palace-o-tarps with earth-insulated, bear-proof cooler cage. after seeing my fellow guides come up with that stuff, i’m amazed we didn’t have a tree/car hybrid like this show up.

  37. chad says:

    I actually saw this car just a couple days ago. It cracked me up at the time.

    But I say, “Why not?” Haha. I’d rather strap a log on than pay the manufacturer a couple thousand dollars for a painted piece of plastic.

  38. KK says:

    this is WIN-WIN, for ingenuity, being green, and saving $$ on car repairs!

  39. Bored says:

    that bumper is definitely win. does its job very well i presume

  40. har says:

    i just dropped a log in the toilet

  41. PiBo says:

    Win. Those of you saying that a car crash involving a tree is so devastating need to realize that trees tend to be rooted in the ground (typically as deep as they are tall) and are vertical – not horizontal. Another Win – The model – ‘Outback.’ = Priceless

  42. Dre says:

    Win all the way

  43. pk-ownage says:

    It’s what makes a subaru, a subaru

  44. Marko says:

    The log is to help getting un-stuck from the mud when you go off-roading.

  45. Dooley says:

    The Subaru Outback. Demonstrating where nature sits on the totem.



Your Comment

 

 

Search

Daily Shipments of Fail via Email

Enter your email address:


Our RSS Fail




  • Tags

  • Pictures by Month

  • Recent Comments

    KatzVonD (with Snide… on Answer Win
    Radebe on Answer Win
    Big Russ on Answer Win
    bloggingseminar on Passenger Seat Fail
    Obama's Teleprompter on Best Western Window Fail
    KatzVonD (with Snide… on Answer Win
    Søren on Answer Win
    KatzVonD (with Snide… on Answer Win
    Squiggly on Answer Win
    GoodByeToday on Answer Win
  • Even More Lulz

 

Quick Sprout