Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.

 

« Previous Burn of the Week | Grocery Fail Next »

Statue Fail


fail owned pwned pictures

Submitted by cryogenix

Incorrect source or offensive?
Reddit This
Stumbleupon This
Post This to Facebook

Add this to your blog:
(Copy & paste code)

» 356 Failures in Communication

  1. I’m the first. I love the guys face. Its says “you like”.

  2. Nwabby says:

    Looky! Penis! Haha! Penis!

  3. Lol says:

    Wow… I can’t even tell what that’s MEANT to be…?

  4. dim says:

    In Soviet India penis owns you!

  5. triLcat says:

    In Turkey, they’re very into penis-showing god statues…
    I’m guessing that the statue is intended to be that way. The fail here is the parent who let their daughter straddle that giant stone phallus for a photo-op.

  6. Reddo says:

    Mine is bigger

  7. zomg says:

    wow, I wonder if she wanted to pose like that, or she was told to….

  8. VOLcano says:

    “The fail here is the parent who let their daughter straddle that giant stone phallus for a photo-op”

    Why? Do you have something against penises? Half the people on the planet have one. Why on earth should anyone find them objectionable?

    I am proud of mine, why are you ashamed of yours, or your mate’s?

  9. Me says:

    Pedobear seal of approval!

  10. lilacsigil says:

    That’s not a fail, that’s a statue with a big penis.

  11. chez says:

    wow… that’ll never fit….

  12. cacapeepee says:

    FIRST!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!1

  13. UnluckyFriedKitten says:

    statue-win
    or photo location fail

  14. nantan says:

    this is more WIN than FAIL – if you’re Stonehenge that is :P

  15. Surreon says:

    I think this is a statue in a roller coaster park in the Netherlands. So therefor is is a photo-shoped picture. I know the “ride” and the statue is in front of it.
    If you look closely you even see that the eyes of the statue is photo-shoped.

  16. Gunslinger says:

    Just a Phallus guys, stop being embarrassed…

  17. SSTV says:

    Take it off please, it is disgusting. How pervert do you have to be to take a picture of a little girl in that pose?

    • TreeFace says:

      He’s right. At least wait till she’s grown up. Give it two years.

    • david says:

      maybe they should take it off, because comments like these are really pissing me off. it’s funny. it’s just like the unfortunately designed donald duck ride. calm yourself.

      • Avis says:

        I had no idea what ride you were refering to….. ’till I looked it up. Now I wish I had not done that.

        • martikate says:

          I had to look it up after the leading comments…I’ll admit it, I snorted. Not just a delicate, polite snigger, but the kind that made my sinuses hurt. Oh, dear… And, again, PARENT FAIL. Yes, the designers of the thing are stupid and/or pervs, but really, it’s the PARENT (who either took the picture or let their child be supervised by the person who took the picture) who clearly should have their parenting licence suspended. Unfortunately, they don’t issue those in the first place…

    • Malfeasant says:

      some people are far too sensitive, it’s not like the girl is nekkid, or putting her mouth on it, or anything sick like that- to say that a 7-8 year old doesn’t know anything about the ‘naughty’ bits of the body is ignorant. True they don’t need to be doing anything with them other than pottying, but hell, i remember being a perv when i was 8, there was this girl in my theater class, we were cutting class one day and running amock throughout the school, and in the basement she had to go pee but there wasn’t a bathroom around, but there was a sink, so she hopped up and did her thing, i remember trying to sneak a peek without being too obvious…

      damn, i hadn’t thought about that in years…

    • Eins says:

      I don’t know how pervert you have to be, but I do know you have to be really PERVERTED.

  18. Anna says:

    .. who made the girl go sit there and then took the picture?

  19. LOL-Commander says:

    LOLZ: look at the eyes of this stature ^-^

  20. Lord_Farin says:

    Hm, I would hate to have square ears and being forced to being a gigolo with little girls… Not to mention being petrified

  21. Tobbsdasock says:

    Is that statue feeling her ass too?!?

  22. avalokiteshvara says:

    That’s the biggest one she’s ever gonna get

  23. GoDHoRuS says:

    this is so wrong…

  24. Wolfie says:

    “I shall name him Rocky, and he will be mine.”

  25. Gwenny says:

    I have my doubts as to whether this was photo shopped, as those were not fertility statues, but tables on which sacrificial hearts were thrown after being ripped from victims. And I also don’t recall the mesoamerican cultures as having circumcision, so why would they depict penises that way?

    The real fail here is having your child posing on what was originally an altar of blood.

    • Nessa says:

      I was wondering if anyone else noticed it was circumcised.

    • ewww says:

      thats friggin stupid, wouldnt an uncircumsized penis still have a head? i didnt know when they cut some skin from me, they gave me a little too, that makes me feel better about the whole thing i guess ( that and not having an ugly penis ) and how many altars of blood have you seen at angled tops like that? werent they flat? and i love the smile on the blood alter.

  26. kenny says:

    That’s what I call a HARD boner.

  27. Rocky says:

    And he has a “ur offering pleases me” look in his face… LoL

  28. Shortee says:

    Obviously a faked foto…

  29. DaveF says:

    This picture is so obviously doctored it takes a lot of the humor out for me. If you look at the penis closely, the color is off from the rest of the stone. Also look at the position of the girl’s bent leg. The penis is positioned right where her knee should be. So either the girl has a detachable lower portion of her leg, the penis is made of a trans-phasic material, or the penis was doctored into the photo. I’m also skeptical about the hand, as it is a sudden pristine part of the statue whereas the arm leading up to it is crumbled. The mouth as well, is slightly lopsided and looks drawn on.

    Amateur photoshop fail.

    • bugloaf says:

      I can see her bent knee; it’s right where I expect it to be. I’m sure it’s not a photoshop, either. Not everyone before the 20th century was a prude. Lots of cultures made dirty sculptures.

      Also, this picture is not a fail, because the photographer and subject are clearly aware of what they’re doing.

      • DaveF says:

        No, what you’re seeing as her knee is actually the scrotum of the penis. Penis penis penis.(That’s four more for blaaaah)

    • blaaaah says:

      “If you look at the penis closely…”

      no thanks, buddy.

      Props for saying “penis” four times in rapid succession though.

    • Denise says:

      Agree, I was just going to post this. Also; if you look at the shadow the statues’ head is casting on the girls’ face, the penis should have cast a shadow on her leg.

    • waffle says:

      The hand is real. The wrist before it isn’t crumbled; if you look closely, you will see it has a regular pattern of ridges, so it looks like one of those coil bracelets or a bung of ring bracelets as would typically decorate the arm of a high ranking person in that culture.

      But I do agree with the eyes and mouth. Poorly done. Those features would not have been as distinct originally, and time would have weathered them down to be less dramatic.

      The phallus, however, I’m not sure. The color looks off, but at the base there is a rise of the original color before going off color. There could have been something already there, though, that was used to form the base.

    • K says:

      “If you look at the penis closely, the color is off from the rest of the stone.”

      Circumcision kinda does that to a penis, dude.

    • xjsynx says:

      Yes, the OG statue is the Mayan rain god ‘Chac’

      http://www.anyhere.com/gward/snaps/Yucatan2007/img/DSC_0330_lA57.jpg

  30. Daniel says:

    Parenting fail.

  31. MettanAtem says:

    IT IS FUCKING SMILING….
    >..<;;

    I call shoped

  32. Le Steak says:

    Wow. Pedophiles who visit this site are sure happy today.

  33. Deadclown says:

    Well I guess that could be considered a birth-control win. Tell her that’s what they ALL look like and maybe she’ll…..oh nevermind she’d probably go and try to see as many as possible. Damn Whores

  34. mitch & murray (from downtown) says:

    the FAIL is all of the above posters not recognizing a crude photoshop job.

  35. Puddy says:

    Not funny, but sick. Who would take (or make) a picture like that? Failblog fail.

  36. misty says:

    OH EMM Gee!

  37. Trainwreck Chaser says:

    okay now that we´ve established that this is possibly photo shoppped, that scares me, where was it photo shopped from?

  38. Joe says:

    dear god…im hoping this is photoshopped…but its still hilarious…:D

  39. chicagogirl28 says:

    This is ridiculous! Whoever took this pic should be fined. This is too close to child pornography! Who in the world would put their kid in this type of pic? Only a tard wouldnt see clearly what this looks like. Idiots!!!

  40. DONT POKE THE BUNNY!!! says:

    no wonder the statue looks surprised…

  41. Mr Dino says:

    PEN IS MIGHTIER

  42. durr says:

    if only this was directly under the mcdonalds fail.

  43. Neon Emu says:

    Obvious photoshop fail.

  44. Bobby says:

    Wow…great parenting there…

  45. galateaparty says:

    Funny, but not real. Choc Mool was a rain god, didn’t look sideways with a ridiculous grin, had his hands wrapped around a bowl to catch rain, not around his penis.

    The same statue is found a million ways all over the Yucatan, and an erect penis is just NOT part of the culture.

    Hysterically funny photoshop job, though,

  46. Lk says:

    WTF, THAT’S EPIC!

  47. mac says:

    Oh ffs, can we please draw a line? I know you asshats who never matured beyond 12-years-old find this hilarious, but real/photoshopped/whatever it’s not appropriate. Had it been an adult woman/man I’d have no objection.

    Flame away, I won’t be back to read ‘em.

  48. Muffles says:

    Not a fail. The guy is falling into a manhole, but the hole has been photoshopped out. His leg has not been severed.

  49. Wolfos says:

    paedofail

  50. Jen says:

    Jesus Christ guys! Meso-American Art knowledge FAIL…

    This is a photoshopped image, the hand is off and the penis is added so the REAL fail is to the a-hole who shopped this and thought it was good for a LOL…

  51. Guess Again says:

    Still wrong no matter what <>

  52. Alex says:

    This is ’shopped. I’ve seen those status and they don’t have wangs. In fact I don’t think I’ve ever seen a wang in any mayan or aztec art come to think of it.

    • Lolnathan says:

      Critical thinking fail.

      Ever think that it’s probably not Mayan or Aztec if its somewhere kids can sit on it? Its probably a one off by some artist who thought he was funny.

      I hate how people think everything on this site is a photoshop job. Paranoid morons.

      • Jen says:

        Being a moron win!

        It’s not paranoia when it’s so fucking obvious it’s shopped…

        Grow a brain

      • ElisaKaye says:

        It is a photoshop job MORON. This statue is acctually at my work Can Cun Las Vegas Nevada, outside by one of our swimming pools in the back, and last time i check the penis was nonexistant.

  53. Maddie says:

    I think the real fail is that the parents let their 8 year old daughter wear a skirt that short.

  54. Hometown Girl says:

    Loveland is located in Korea on one of the larger islands, Jeju do (Cheju do) and features statues in sexual poses as well as phallic representations. Check it out on Wiki under Jeju Loveland. The child might be photoshopped because most of the kid pics I’ve seen on the statues are of Korean kids.

  55. Christian says:

    ugh…that’s so damn dirty

  56. Gypo says:

    The comments section is a mirror on our weird society, or societies, (seeing as how most seem to be from the bigger side of “the pond”…. the picture is funny, get over it!

    Life wasn’t written by a committee, and some bits simply are funny, that’s it. Stop trying to read into it your own prejudices and silliness, because it’s not going to change no matter how much you wish it would fit into your nice neat little (sterile) boxes.

    Who got hurt here? Nobody, that’s who.

    Meh….

    • Azkyroth says:

      A thought on the comments about how “innappropriate” this supposedly is:

      “Two traveling monks reached a river where they met a young woman. Wary of the current, she asked if they could carry her across. One of the monks hesitated, but the other quickly picked her up onto his shoulders, transported her across the water, and put her down on the other bank. She thanked him and departed. As the monks continued on their way, the one was brooding and preoccupied. Unable to hold his silence, he spoke out. ‘Brother, our spiritual training teaches us to avoid any contact with women, but you picked that one up on your shoulders and carried her!’
      ‘Brother,’ the second monk replied, ‘I set her down on the other side, while you are still carrying her.’”

      *awaits analogy-comprehension-fail*

      • Malfeasant says:

        wow… that’s deep

      • Last again says:

        what?

        • Azkyroth says:

          “People who squawk about others’ inappropriate behavior, especially when no harm is occurring, are often motivated by guilty consciences and the projection of their own obsessions onto others.”

          Or, to put it less obliquely:

          “To a closeted pedophile, everything reminiscent of sex, and involving children, looks like porn, and they’re likely to say something in order to be seen protesting it and defuse the accusations they expect may follow because they’re projecting their own mental state onto others. Generally, normal people won’t see the problem until they stop to think about it and/or a closeted pedophile squawks about it.” Is that clearer?

          • LaPanthereRose says:

            Let’s sumarize : if you “squawk about others’ inappropriate behavior”, you fail and if you write dirty about it, you fail too !
            So the best way to react at this photoshop job is to have no reaction at all !
            What a boring site FAILBlog would be that way ….

          • LaPanthereRose says:

            in other words : if you “squawk about others’ inappropriate behavior”, you fail ! and if you write dirty comment about this photo(shop), you fail too !
            Guess the only acceptable reaction is no reaction at all !
            What a boring site FAILBlog would be, if that happens …

            • Azkyroth says:

              I look at the picture and I see a harmless piece of off-color humor. What does it say about certain others that they look at it and the first thing they think is “porn?”

          • Malfeasant says:

            you said what i was thinking way better than i could say it… in fact when i try to say it, people call me creepy and weird… but i’m used to that

  57. yarrmanda says:

    All you need is to look twice at the picture and it’s more than a little obviously photoshopped. So get over it. Seriously.

  58. muzak says:

    Photoshop operator fail: note bene, the shadow of the statue’s head and the lack-o-phallus shadow on girl’s right leg.

    • PiMan says:

      I’m looking, but I’m not seeing the problem (other than the psychological one). The shadows of the head suggest that all shadows should be almost perfectly parallel to the statue. The small amount of shadow that should be on the leg, is on the side of the leg we cannot see.
      On the other hand, the mouth is without a doubt photoshopped, and the penis still may be.

      • rawr says:

        I still call ’shopped. The shape is more realistic than the face, so the style doesn’t match. It’s also only placed correctly if you’re trying to get her legs around it–you’ll notice that it’s just coming up just above his knees rather than at his crotch.

  59. Last again says:

    Yes…Last again

  60. Gregor says:

    hmmmm, it would appear that this statue has no limitations.. har har.

  61. anastasia beaverhousen says:

    ouch? yes. ouch.

  62. Louis says:

    What this world needs is a complete ban on the use of the word “Photoshopped” by people who are not expert in using Photoshop. I found a picture of mine on the front page of Digg the other month (which pleased me) and underneath it about 600 mindless little twirps had cried “Photoshopped” (which didn’t). One particularly brain dead example had Photoshopping and CGI mixed up, so he thought it was a computer generated scene.

    • Malfeasant says:

      people see something unusual enough, they cry photoshop. what they don’t realise is this world is huge and has billions of people and millions of cameras, and weird stuff does happen from time to time, and once in a while, with increasing frequency, weird things coincide with a camera to record it

      • Redd says:

        look at the shadows on the girl’s leg. You can see that if this was real, the shadow of the prick would be on her leg…it’s clearly not…therefore it’s fake.

        Fail at social diversity comment.

  63. Jay says:

    Lol he’s actually a buddhist god, and they worship his… thing. True story…

  64. Agnus says:

    That’s sooooo wrong…..

  65. Fail says:

    Photoshop fail — it’s not even done very well as some others have pointed out. I can’t believe this not only made first page but spawned some moral outrage at these parents.

    Save the moral outrage for whoever shopped it and posted it…and marvel at the people who actually voted for it.

  66. okami36 says:

    THE PENIS IS EVIL!

    THE GUN IS GOOD!

  67. H says:

    More like Parent/Guardian Fail

  68. gruelin1 says:

    you should take this down. Not right for a little girl to be in a pic like this.

  69. Scary Dream says:

    “Here sweetie, pose with your legs wrapped around this statue, and we’ll put it up on the internet for all of the pedoph–I mean–your family to see.”

    Really… these parents fail.

  70. K-DeviL. says:

    Why would a person take a picture of their kid like that in the first place? o.O

  71. Not yer mom says:

    Shopped.

  72. naturalywrong says:

    Somebody should have noticed….surely.

  73. i should just register says:

    Don’t you mean “STATUE WIN”?

  74. Tara Lacy-Hansell says:

    omg….why.

  75. something slight says:

    odd,creepy statue ftw!

  76. diandra128 says:

    Photo shop fail! Very poorly done at that. Some sicko photoshoppedofile at work on this one. Actually …as a parent I find it highly offensive.

  77. Tom says:

    the girl is quite obiusly part of the statue only painted
    xD

  78. U're a Fuckface says:

    Look at her dick… its so tiny

  79. justin says:

    Isn’t this more of a parenting fail.

  80. Jimmy says:

    so whats the story behind this chacmool. O.o they’re not normally suppose to have big giant penis with creapy looks on their faces.

  81. Son Ryu says:

    Statue win- Parent Fail

  82. Narlethotep says:

    I think the real question is not the question of Photoshop. But if this turns me on a little, does that make me a pedophile–or a size queen?

  83. Anon says:

    /d/ would call this a win.

  84. MentalFloss says:

    How do we know that’s part of the statue, and that the little girl didn’t actually just purchase a poorly-made foreign strap-on?

  85. Obviousphotoshop says:

    Obvious photoshop is obvious (look at hand)

  86. The pon pon says:

    So, after reading about 1 and half pages of comments, I decided there are people out there who need more of a life than me :) <3 failblog, </3 all of you

  87. lovinit says:

    i love it!!! major turn on!!! more more more! i wish she was on me

  88. Andrew says:

    Those early civilisations were alot more relaxed over sex taboos, unlike us. Just as well really otherwise we’d all be raving nyphomaniacs.

  89. ElisaKaye says:

    This is belive it or not my work. Can Cun Resort Las Vegas Nevada. This was photoshopped. There is no penis on the statue. Who ever did this is less than funny. Its a little girl for the love of Jesus Christ.
    FAIL FAIL FAIL at being funny.
    EPIC FAIL!

  90. adas says:

    Photoshopped or not, still funny. But not for that girl I guess, hope none of her friends or so would see this

  91. Tavita says:

    I went through all the comments to say this………
    “Who Cares”.

  92. ThatGuyOverThere says:

    At first I studied the pict to see what that pole really is… untill I realized….it was what we first thought it was…. but wait… why is the statue so happy about it?

  93. Mike says:

    Looks more like a statue ‘WIN’; ‘Parenting FAIL’

  94. Moleculow says:

    That’s been photococked.

  95. lydia says:

    Who the hell let this little girl get on this statue to take a picture of anyway? What a pedophile perve! FAIL

  96. michael says:

    WIN for the girl

  97. Shoopdawhoop says:

    Obvious photoshop is obvious

  98. 2222@2.com says:

    I wanna be that statue



Your Comment

 

 

Search

Daily Shipments of Fail via Email

Enter your email address:


Our RSS Fail




  • Tags

  • Pictures by Month

  • Recent Comments

    Judy on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    Rafael França on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    ZombieApocalypse on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    FIRST on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    Cloral on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    thewinchester on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    Capitán General Alam… on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    Rayna on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    ZombieApocalypse on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
    BOLDz0r on OMG U FAIL SO HARD
  • Even More Lulz

 

Quick Sprout