If you get your heads out of the tits (or lack thereof) and look at the background, underneath where the giant red arrows were drawn, the chick’s reflection is there. It was made to look like this happened. It’s a posed, doctored pic. I would say that if they were going for comments, this turned out to be an epic win.
1) The ‘child’ y’all keep talking about looks to be at least a teenager. His lower body is cut off by the “reflection” of the woman’s leg.
2) If that mirror is actually in that room, where is all the other stuff that’s being reflected in it?
3) It’s supposed to be a mirrored wall. There’s a light switch and an electrical outlet on it.
Forget everything else you mentioned. The first thing I wondered when
I saw this was, “where the hell is the photog in the mirror?” We should
see his/her reflection where the child is. Also her shadowing is all wrong.
Good ol photoshop layers.
As an electrician I have to wonder what a mirrored wall has to do with switches and outlets. That mirror is hung on the wall the same way drywall or paneling would be. Glass cutters cost $4 and the cover plates will easily hide any scruffy cuts. All you have to do is run your wiring before the mirror is mounted then everything else is standard operating procedure. Dummy. Dolt. Dullard.
Child is on a television. Look carefully, that is not an actual kid in the room. Mirror on the back wall, reflecting a TV. Kid on TV is in front of a white door, see the doorknob? Now, where is the rest of that door? Out of the TV frame. Look at the angle the kid and white door are at in relation to the rest of the room. Makes no sense unless it’s a picture on TV. If kid is real, WHERE ARE HIS LEGS? Failblog fail, except for the fact that she looks like a prepubescent boy.
I disagree; there’s no bottom for the tv screen. I think the white thing is the side of a dresser or the like (the white thing has dimension)! What looks like a doorknob is probably a stain from some kind of substance. Use your imaginatorynation.
reflection of the person who took the picture,just above the crisp packet on the table,kid is behind them on t.v,or something.dont you people get perception ?
Unfortunatly, the “mirror” next to the door is fake. the table leg shadows in the mirror go the same direction as teh actual shadows and tehy should go the opposite way
There are two shadows being cast. One from the light in the room and the other from the light being reflected in the mirror. You can only see one shadow in the mirror image.
What’s wrong with you people? Nobody can figure it out? The mirror is fake as well the reflection on it. Instead a mirror there is a window (obviusly beside the front door).
If you put all the things together (the chick, the kid and the chair reflection, the switch ligth and staff like that, and the rest of the details making us think that’s a real mirror) it seems like a very disturbing picture, and that was the idea. But the fact is this is not true. See you.
Would you guys stop making fun of me that is my picture oof me jut cause i wanted a failblog picture doesn’t mean im a bad mom he probablly won’t remember anyway he is only 3
Yeah – it’s definitely a mirror – you can see the reflection of the chair ehind the table that’s in the foreground of the pic. EEEEEWWWWWWW!!!!! That means tha poor lil kid is looking directly at this debauchery. Yikes. Makes Britney look like mother of the year….
It has to be a mirror look at the whole thing they have a lightswitch cover
floating above the kids head..and another in front of him, the chair is reflected in the mirror wall.i think it is photoshopped because the floor is different in the reflection
It’s definitely a mirror – if you look carefully at the left of the child, you can see the reflection of the back of the woman’s leg/foot. So the kid is sitting IN FRONT of her. Nice.
Looking at the picture like that, the pink and blue between the table and chair in the reflection is probably the photographer, sitting behind the kid.
It can’t be a mirror. If it were a mirror, the shadows from the chair in the back would be going back towards the kid to match the ones from the foreground chair. It must be photoshopped. without the mirror, there is no explanation for the floating light switch and socket.
If it IS real…FAIL!!!
Yeah, cuz if you care about privacy, you totally let somebody take nude photos of you.
(Not that that means she consented to get them spread far and wide… so to speak… but I always roll my eyes when people are SO SHOCKED that their photos were spread around by their disgruntled ex.)
no, its a mirror which is showing the reflection of her child playing in the other room. Its angled away so that the child can see the photographer but the photographer wont be seen in the reflection of the mirror. The fail is that shes acting like a slut while her kid is in the other room and she thinks shes being discreet but theres a mirror showing that her kid is there so thats the fail. Durr. They are nice pants mind. But she has odd hands.
I actually think this is a failed fail because I am pretty sure that is a TV. With the snacks on the table I think its a home date gone wild that leaked into the wild. Now the Date may be a fail but I don’t see this one as a fail.
Its either photo-shopped or a tv in the background. The area around the kid has a nice bright wall behind him, and the rest of the room has a dark background.
you have to start teaching children viable skills early, you can’t send them out into the big wide playground without some job earning prospects! no longer shall children let adults steal their kiddie porn jobs! they shall rise up and concur!
there is a mirror on the wall next to the door. the camera is behind the table, that is why you can’t see it. The child is sitting IN FRONT of the woman so that she can see him.
it is definitely 100% sure a mirror, there is a switch beside the door on the mirror wall, also the chair is reflected. the question is..if this kid is real, photoshopped, or is he taking the pic, or why not…a ghost. like in the “look whos talking” movie..
Yeah, its a mirror, in addition to the stuff being reversed, she’s actually reflected in the mirror as well. The kid is right in front of her but looking at his reflection instead of the woman.
So is this a Children’s Services fail?
If you look at the angles of perspective, you will see that the camera is situated (in the reflection) somewhere immediately to the right of the top of the table leg… since there is nothing resembling a body either above or below that spot, it would be fair to assume that she placed the camera and took the picture herself on timer. Since the boy is almost directly inbetween her and the camera,it would also be fair to assume that the kid was in plain sight of her, lucky little bugger.
it looks like she’s photo shopped in
but i don’t really know
I’m just saying that because the lighting on her legs don’t really look like they match the lighting in the room
yet another reason why to only take nude photos with a digital camera. you take that role of film to the local 1-hour photo and some clerks walking out with his own copies. seen it happen.
Looks like a grown man wearing a baseball cap, with facial hair – perhaps he’s the photographer’s assistant, or the model’s boyfriend. Crap photo anyway.
Not necesarily. If that is a mirror the only thing you know for sure is that they are facing opposite directions. It is possible they are both facing away from each other. Here’s a crappy diagram of what I’m talking about
N=naked chick M=Munchkin, C=Camera and | is the mirror that may or may not be a mirror.
C=> |
Also even if the kid IS actually there (Which I don’t think he is but I’m not going to go into that) that the lady in the pic is the kids mom. That could be a big sister for all we know.
Oh my Lord (…I mean Allah, stay in character dipshit). Where was I? Oh ya. Oh my Allah!!! I can’t believe what I’m seeing here. Can you believe that this woman is leaving that bag of chips open on the table to get stale? What kind of home is she running?
She needs to take them nipple clips off and put them back on the bag where they belong. That kid is going to grow up with a complex about eating stale snack foods.
My Mom never ran around the house naked with strange men taking pictures of her until after the food was put up. It’s common sense people.
I think that’s that little Chinese kid from The Grudge. I see him in closets and elevators all the time. It’s hard to plan your pornification knowing he could pop in an any time and start howling like a cat. It’s crazy, I tells ya!
OH MY GOD YOU GUYS ARE ALLLL MISSING IT! the fucking kid is HOLDING the CAMERA! this lady had her kid take a picture of his own mom naked!!!!! he’s gonna be uber scarred for life when he finds this pic on the net in 10 years.
while this 1 is ok i saw 1 that was much worse, the lady was butt naked spread eagle and in the lower corner you could see her kid, in the pic (i wish i could find it now lol)
Ok, first of all, you’re pretty much all idiots… (but who am I to judge, I just read all your comments…)
SECOND, the scene in the background is NOT a mirror… it’s another ROOM, you can tell by the way the light is coming FROM THAT ROOM and making shadows on the table and chair legs on the floor… SECOND, if that WERE a kid (which it’s NOT, it’s a pic on a bag or box), it’s one of the SMALLEST CHILDREN IN THE WORLD… look at the fact that the (supposed) kid is SITTING UP, with a FULL HEAD OF HAIR, and looks about 4 or 5, but is actually VERY SMALL (because, of course, it’s a PICTURE on something)…
Still, I’d really have to do the chick… she looks way too easy/sleazy to pass up…
I see 1 chick with pants, 3 dudes, 0 children, and a mirror, the child looking person is half hidden behind the reflection of the chick. so the “child” is lying down, so is most likely a dude like the other 2 dudes in the pick, the others dudes heads are just above the chip packet, and just below the the table looking away.
The picture is photoshopped. It’s not a different room because of the hovering light switch and plug-in. It’s not a mirror because the shadow of the chair in the “reflection” would be going the other way.
It is a mirror unless there are two chicks in black panties. The light in upper right corner shines over top of table so no shadow reverse in mirror and the “kid” is just a guy laying in beanbag chair. Can’t tell if object above him is camera or not. Only FAIL is due to crappy pic and debate over the mirror. Stuped!
It is a mirror. The chair is clearly reflected in the mirror, as well as the woman. Below the “child” is something attached to the mirror – it is blocking the reflection of the woman’s leg. What you have not noticed, is that the child is not a reflection – is not even in the room. It is a PICTURE of a child TAPED to the mirror. You can see the tape on the top and side of the picture if you zoom in enough. The background behind the child is completely different from the rest of the image, indicating that it was taken somewhere else. Sheesh.
Interesting theory, but I think the “tape” is just white or shiny things catching the light. First reason is logic: if you’re sticking a picture on a wall, why would you put it down so low? It’s way below eye level when you’re standing up, which is probably how she spends most of her time (despite the evidence this picture presents to the contrary).
Second reason: the “kid” is definitely leaning on something red (cushion, bean bag?) And that red thing goes behind the power socket, not above it. So unless they carefully cut around the bottom of the picture in order to stick it an absurdly low height on the mirrorwall, it’s not attached to that wall.
It is a mirror for sure, the reflected shadows are from the camera flash and therefore the camera never catches the direct shadows and instead just the indirect.
So the only shadows you can see in front of the mirror is the shadow from the reflected flash while the only shadow you can see in the mirror is the shadow from the flash before it hits the mirror.
so all you guys saying that the shadows going different ways is proof that its not a mirror is wrong, thats proof that it is a mirror since photoshopping that effect would be near to impossible.
well, if it is a mirror which based on the reflective light it is, i would say that its a full wall mirror because its the only way to logically explain why you would be able to see the mirror down there and because of the reflections of light on both the chair and her back, and as for the child on the red bean bag, i would say hes in the doorway of another room in front of the sexy milf’s mirror
Because i know someones going to say: “oh yeah, well how do you explain the wall outlet?” the wall outlet is in a hole cut in the mirror with a outlet in it…
Indeed it’s pretty simple and obviously a mirror wall. You can see the power outlet and light switch cut out in the mirror. The fail part is that the kid is clearly in front of her, in the mirror reflection you can see the back view of her leg and arm with the kid facing her. No need for someone to take the pic, very easy with a timer on the camera. She’s probably doing pics to catch a man online, should have kept the kid out of view for a better effect.
(PhotoShopped)
1.Shadows in Supposed mirror go wrong way
2.if it isnt a mirrow the obviouse floating light switches… 100% photoshopped and to top it off look how fake the shadows look in the mirrior
3.Shes sexy
sexy fail
is it a fail..?
hm, she looks like there is a raid going on. And the robber says, take your cloth down and put the hands where i can see. ^^ By the way, nice pants.
The mirror indicates the woman (milf) is actually facing the child…
Through the confusion of the child and possible mental scarring and a later life lust of his mother in a sexual way, I’d bone her.
Double take to get that it’s a mirror – a very good fail.
awesome fail…but i wonder who took the pik
The picture’s been doctored.
If you get your heads out of the tits (or lack thereof) and look at the background, underneath where the giant red arrows were drawn, the chick’s reflection is there. It was made to look like this happened. It’s a posed, doctored pic. I would say that if they were going for comments, this turned out to be an epic win.
1) The ‘child’ y’all keep talking about looks to be at least a teenager. His lower body is cut off by the “reflection” of the woman’s leg.
2) If that mirror is actually in that room, where is all the other stuff that’s being reflected in it?
3) It’s supposed to be a mirrored wall. There’s a light switch and an electrical outlet on it.
4) Y’all spent far too much time with this one.
Peace.
Forget everything else you mentioned. The first thing I wondered when
I saw this was, “where the hell is the photog in the mirror?” We should
see his/her reflection where the child is. Also her shadowing is all wrong.
Good ol photoshop layers.
Ever heard of laws of physics and self shooting cameras?
Too much time fail
*masturbates*
EW
As an electrician I have to wonder what a mirrored wall has to do with switches and outlets. That mirror is hung on the wall the same way drywall or paneling would be. Glass cutters cost $4 and the cover plates will easily hide any scruffy cuts. All you have to do is run your wiring before the mirror is mounted then everything else is standard operating procedure. Dummy. Dolt. Dullard.
mee too
it’s a get you child traumatized for life win…
MILF!!! win
Chances are that that kid has drank those boobies.
i wish i’d drank from those boobies too…
it´s babys reflection in a mirror, right? so the child is not there accidentally…
holy crap… wow, that is desturbing.
What is disturbing is your spelling of disturbing!!
“holy crap… wow, that is desturbing.”
spell fail
It’s not a mirror… the kids sitting on the floor if you look closely
Yeah, and floors disappear mysteriously in mirrors.
obviously its a mirror…. why would there be a door next to an OPEN DOORWAY
me 2!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!
Child is on a television. Look carefully, that is not an actual kid in the room. Mirror on the back wall, reflecting a TV. Kid on TV is in front of a white door, see the doorknob? Now, where is the rest of that door? Out of the TV frame. Look at the angle the kid and white door are at in relation to the rest of the room. Makes no sense unless it’s a picture on TV. If kid is real, WHERE ARE HIS LEGS? Failblog fail, except for the fact that she looks like a prepubescent boy.
If I could find a prepubescent boy that looked like that(w/boobs), I would be gayest pedo you ever met.
Wow. You either have one kick-ass screen or amazing vision. It’s a justifying topless pictures win.
I disagree; there’s no bottom for the tv screen. I think the white thing is the side of a dresser or the like (the white thing has dimension)! What looks like a doorknob is probably a stain from some kind of substance. Use your imaginatorynation.
You must have spent hours looking at this picture, perve!
She isn’t even showing much. Perve fail
reflection of the person who took the picture,just above the crisp packet on the table,kid is behind them on t.v,or something.dont you people get perception ?
by the way,milf,deffo.
WIN for us and the kid!
Unfortunatly, the “mirror” next to the door is fake. the table leg shadows in the mirror go the same direction as teh actual shadows and tehy should go the opposite way
There are two shadows being cast. One from the light in the room and the other from the light being reflected in the mirror. You can only see one shadow in the mirror image.
What’s wrong with you people? Nobody can figure it out? The mirror is fake as well the reflection on it. Instead a mirror there is a window (obviusly beside the front door).
If you put all the things together (the chick, the kid and the chair reflection, the switch ligth and staff like that, and the rest of the details making us think that’s a real mirror) it seems like a very disturbing picture, and that was the idea. But the fact is this is not true. See you.
Would you guys stop making fun of me that is my picture oof me jut cause i wanted a failblog picture doesn’t mean im a bad mom he probablly won’t remember anyway he is only 3
mommy… what are you doing?
OMG SECOND
I AM TEH AWESOME
It doesn’t look like the kid in the background is real, almost like it’s a picture on a box or something…anyone else get that feeling?
Looks like it’s a mirror on the wall
Yeah – it’s definitely a mirror – you can see the reflection of the chair ehind the table that’s in the foreground of the pic. EEEEEWWWWWWW!!!!! That means tha poor lil kid is looking directly at this debauchery. Yikes. Makes Britney look like mother of the year….
Yeah but look at the shadows of the table and such if its a mirror,doesnt
add up.
yea i kinda got that feeling untill i zoomed in on him
i think thats a real kid
yeh its not real.. maybe its a mirror or sth like that
JOO 4R3 T3H 4WESOM3!!!1
ZOMGS IM THIrDS LULZ
interior design fail?
Nah, it’s a child.
lol.
OMG THAS MY PICTURE!!!
U LOOSE!!!!!
u serious?
ur hot
failure is in her hands. geddit? geddit?
The disturbing thing is, that’s the father.
wha? which one? the one holding the boobs?
Lol…
why is it fail?
Because she’s posing nude, while her child is alone in the other room (maybe traumatized).
Hey!!!
She’s wearing pants.
Very short ones.
what pants?
oh.
9th
first omglolwtfbbqbzoqmos
Mates Rates?
wait a minute, is that a mirror !!!
Yeah! I think you’re right…I totally didn’t catch that…but looking at the edges…it’s most definitely a mirror…so where’s the camera? Now i’m confused.
It’s not a mirror — if it were, then we’d be seeing double shadows from that bright light in the other room.
Either way, parenting fail!
It has to be a mirror look at the whole thing they have a lightswitch cover
floating above the kids head..and another in front of him, the chair is reflected in the mirror wall.i think it is photoshopped because the floor is different in the reflection
it might be that the galre of the floor makes it look photosopped.
oh. still a fail.
I think it is a mirror. Look at the chair under the table.
It’s definitely a mirror – if you look carefully at the left of the child, you can see the reflection of the back of the woman’s leg/foot. So the kid is sitting IN FRONT of her. Nice.
Looking at the picture like that, the pink and blue between the table and chair in the reflection is probably the photographer, sitting behind the kid.
perception,knobheads
Has to be a mirror, look at the white bank on the floor that supposedly “separates” the two rooms. Definitely large wall mirror.
It can’t be a mirror. If it were a mirror, the shadows from the chair in the back would be going back towards the kid to match the ones from the foreground chair. It must be photoshopped. without the mirror, there is no explanation for the floating light switch and socket.
If it IS real…FAIL!!!
Oooh! look! woman holding breasts!
… Wait, is that a… CHILD! Damn, not again….
Again? o_o
It’s his mom in the picture.
Win.
no can doo mothers. kthxbai!
Soccer Moms Gone Wild! She’s probably a school PTO president:)
omg….mom????
omg.. brother?
Respecting other people’s privacy fail.
Yeah, cuz if you care about privacy, you totally let somebody take nude photos of you.
(Not that that means she consented to get them spread far and wide… so to speak… but I always roll my eyes when people are SO SHOCKED that their photos were spread around by their disgruntled ex.)
Haha, you said “spread far and wide.”
Innuendo win.
And before anyone makes a pun about “I’ll give YOU in you endo” type of stuff… don’t. It’s been done. By moi.
Moi got fired for complaining too much and for mouthing off in my wheel house.
*insert crabs reference here*
Cold ass win!!!!!!!
Publishing intimacies about your ex really is low, disrespectful and despicable. Simple as that.
Whos says it’s her Ex? Icould just be a porn shooting.
You’re right. But that was a reply to A.Non
no breasts FAIL
no breasts win
breast fail
beutiful small breasts win
Win.
lolz all woman are bitches except mom! no wait even she got pimpered with, noooo mom how u could do this to me! rofl
It#s just a mirror, and I guess you see the guy who is taking the picture, or even a poster on the opposite wall…
Boring
so wait… THAT is the fail? ok, booooooooooooooring.
no, its a mirror which is showing the reflection of her child playing in the other room. Its angled away so that the child can see the photographer but the photographer wont be seen in the reflection of the mirror. The fail is that shes acting like a slut while her kid is in the other room and she thinks shes being discreet but theres a mirror showing that her kid is there so thats the fail. Durr. They are nice pants mind. But she has odd hands.
“The fail is that shes acting like a slut while her kid is in the other room”
How can that be a fail? You haven’t got small children and thus a lot of privacy, right?
She could’ve had the camera on a timer. Hence getting rid of the need for someone to take the photo.
I actually think this is a failed fail because I am pretty sure that is a TV. With the snacks on the table I think its a home date gone wild that leaked into the wild. Now the Date may be a fail but I don’t see this one as a fail.
i agree it looks like a tv
MILF FAIL
MILF WIN!
PARENTING MILF FAIL
NAKED MILF WIN
NAKED MILF FAIL
She’s still wearing pants.
WORLD’S GREATEST BABYSITTER…WIN!!!!!!
Comment WIN!
Dito!
Pokémon win
Indead!
That’s an empowered woman. No child is going to stand in the way of her and her nude modeling career.
sexy.
the milf isnt bad, either.
It’s a mirror. And it’s a big deal if she’s a mother??? She’s gotta pay the bills. Fail fail.
What if its the sister? ^_^
She only does it so she can afford the drugs … for the child
CV pic?
ROFL, what’s she applying for? A job as a Clinton intern?>
Ha comment win!
Nice to see the ghost kid from Three Men and a Baby getting work again after all these years, even if it is in some bad Portuguese home porno.
80’s reference WIN!
The world is going on the wrong way…
No! It’s a mirror. She’s a stripper and she’s dancing for those kids. WOOOO!
Probably…
I wish I had birthday parties like that when I was a kid
Damn she’s got some sweaty cootch.
That’s pubic hair, genius.
Actually probably the pad inside the crotch of the panty.
Could you say that again please?
Its either photo-shopped or a tv in the background. The area around the kid has a nice bright wall behind him, and the rest of the room has a dark background.
It’s a mirror, yeah, so, that means the kid is in the room with her looking AT her. And it ain’t no TV.
Interior Design Fail
i think it is a fish tank
The only fail is that she’s over 16.
going to jail WIN!!
I’ll do the time and I got the place win. Loose pussy from childbirth fail. Brian Peppers boy banger fail.
Sexy fail!!
early childhood education win!
you have to start teaching children viable skills early, you can’t send them out into the big wide playground without some job earning prospects! no longer shall children let adults steal their kiddie porn jobs! they shall rise up and concur!
double entendres, is there anything you can’t do?
there is a mirror on the wall next to the door. the camera is behind the table, that is why you can’t see it. The child is sitting IN FRONT of the woman so that she can see him.
I think the kid is in the other room, is he not?
first
comment fail
it is definitely 100% sure a mirror, there is a switch beside the door on the mirror wall, also the chair is reflected. the question is..if this kid is real, photoshopped, or is he taking the pic, or why not…a ghost. like in the “look whos talking” movie..
but definitely a mirror
In Soviet Russia small child pimps you!
I thought it was a TV o_x
It could be a sister/aunt/cousin or a sitter – I don’t see stretchmarks on this woman’s stomach.
Meh. My mom gave birth to and breastfed 5 children and she has no stretch marks either. o.O
Creepy knowledge of your Mom’s body WIN!
I can’t see any fail on this pic.. just the girl.
It is a large mirror on the wall, see, there is an outlet on it and there’s a border underneath of it.
Yeah, its a mirror, in addition to the stuff being reversed, she’s actually reflected in the mirror as well. The kid is right in front of her but looking at his reflection instead of the woman.
So is this a Children’s Services fail?
If you look at the angles of perspective, you will see that the camera is situated (in the reflection) somewhere immediately to the right of the top of the table leg… since there is nothing resembling a body either above or below that spot, it would be fair to assume that she placed the camera and took the picture herself on timer. Since the boy is almost directly inbetween her and the camera,it would also be fair to assume that the kid was in plain sight of her, lucky little bugger.
correct,head of person who took the picture just visible above the packet on the table,perspective!
it looks like she’s photo shopped in
but i don’t really know
I’m just saying that because the lighting on her legs don’t really look like they match the lighting in the room
on the left of the kids reflection in the mirror you can see her reflection.
-mh-
Maphax???????
I think it is a mirror and he photographer is just a midget with a baby face
yet another reason why to only take nude photos with a digital camera. you take that role of film to the local 1-hour photo and some clerks walking out with his own copies. seen it happen.
Looks like a grown man wearing a baseball cap, with facial hair – perhaps he’s the photographer’s assistant, or the model’s boyfriend. Crap photo anyway.
attention whore WIN!
Mommy? is this how u put food on the table?
Mommy’s got to make money somehow…
Guys, the background isnt another room, its a mirror. Look on the edges of the frame of the mirror, you’ll see it. And yes, shes facing him. :[
And yes, shes facing him. :[
Not necesarily. If that is a mirror the only thing you know for sure is that they are facing opposite directions. It is possible they are both facing away from each other. Here’s a crappy diagram of what I’m talking about
N=naked chick M=Munchkin, C=Camera and | is the mirror that may or may not be a mirror.
C=> |
Also even if the kid IS actually there (Which I don’t think he is but I’m not going to go into that) that the lady in the pic is the kids mom. That could be a big sister for all we know.
I would so fucking hit that.
Not the kid. The woman.
I support single moms.
I wanna that mommy too
It took me five minutes to see the arrows leading to the kid
take care of you child….you stupid whore!
Wow. Fail in general. Ooh, I’ve never *not* seen a thin woman’s boobs on the internet!
the kid took the picture
methinks the woman is not his mother as you all proffess but his sister
makes more sense to me plus she looks a bit young to be his mother
but then again now that i’m PC gone mad we mustn’t discriminate she could be any body and of course it’s acceptable to be a young mum
Yes, there is a mirror on the wall.
So the Children see his mother naked
by the way nice panty
No shaved pussy in the pic – FAIL
God shave the queen!
Oh my Lord (…I mean Allah, stay in character dipshit). Where was I? Oh ya. Oh my Allah!!! I can’t believe what I’m seeing here. Can you believe that this woman is leaving that bag of chips open on the table to get stale? What kind of home is she running?
She needs to take them nipple clips off and put them back on the bag where they belong. That kid is going to grow up with a complex about eating stale snack foods.
My Mom never ran around the house naked with strange men taking pictures of her until after the food was put up. It’s common sense people.
I think that’s that little Chinese kid from The Grudge. I see him in closets and elevators all the time. It’s hard to plan your pornification knowing he could pop in an any time and start howling like a cat. It’s crazy, I tells ya!
the wife dresses like this everyday?
husband WIN..!!
So there’s a TV on in the back room – how is that a fail?
you do not even know if the kid is her son..maybe she is the photographer’s son…maybe it is not even a kid…
Crop fail
OH MY GOD YOU GUYS ARE ALLLL MISSING IT! the fucking kid is HOLDING the CAMERA! this lady had her kid take a picture of his own mom naked!!!!! he’s gonna be uber scarred for life when he finds this pic on the net in 10 years.
while this 1 is ok i saw 1 that was much worse, the lady was butt naked spread eagle and in the lower corner you could see her kid, in the pic (i wish i could find it now lol)
move her ass to the kitchen, lawl
….The kid is very much a seen from the Shinning, the first one, original.
Which, of course, does the same sort of thing to me, I mean, that elevator full of blood TOTALLY gets me randy.
actually, if you look at the shadows on the ground, it can’t be a mirror
the light comes from the back, and the chair projects it’s shadow towards the camera
if it was a mirror, the shadows would be inverted too…
everyone fails ^^
Ok, first of all, you’re pretty much all idiots… (but who am I to judge, I just read all your comments…)
SECOND, the scene in the background is NOT a mirror… it’s another ROOM, you can tell by the way the light is coming FROM THAT ROOM and making shadows on the table and chair legs on the floor… SECOND, if that WERE a kid (which it’s NOT, it’s a pic on a bag or box), it’s one of the SMALLEST CHILDREN IN THE WORLD… look at the fact that the (supposed) kid is SITTING UP, with a FULL HEAD OF HAIR, and looks about 4 or 5, but is actually VERY SMALL (because, of course, it’s a PICTURE on something)…
Still, I’d really have to do the chick… she looks way too easy/sleazy to pass up…
Is it just me or does this girl look like Rebecca Linares to anyone else? Man, she’s hot.
I’m surprised that nobody noticed that it is actually a picture of a child on a white box.
I see 1 chick with pants, 3 dudes, 0 children, and a mirror, the child looking person is half hidden behind the reflection of the chick. so the “child” is lying down, so is most likely a dude like the other 2 dudes in the pick, the others dudes heads are just above the chip packet, and just below the the table looking away.
hope that makes sence…
and the Ms. Cartman of the year award goes tooooooo……….
haha
The picture is photoshopped. It’s not a different room because of the hovering light switch and plug-in. It’s not a mirror because the shadow of the chair in the “reflection” would be going the other way.
It is a mirror unless there are two chicks in black panties. The light in upper right corner shines over top of table so no shadow reverse in mirror and the “kid” is just a guy laying in beanbag chair. Can’t tell if object above him is camera or not. Only FAIL is due to crappy pic and debate over the mirror. Stuped!
It is a mirror. The chair is clearly reflected in the mirror, as well as the woman. Below the “child” is something attached to the mirror – it is blocking the reflection of the woman’s leg. What you have not noticed, is that the child is not a reflection – is not even in the room. It is a PICTURE of a child TAPED to the mirror. You can see the tape on the top and side of the picture if you zoom in enough. The background behind the child is completely different from the rest of the image, indicating that it was taken somewhere else. Sheesh.
Interesting theory, but I think the “tape” is just white or shiny things catching the light. First reason is logic: if you’re sticking a picture on a wall, why would you put it down so low? It’s way below eye level when you’re standing up, which is probably how she spends most of her time (despite the evidence this picture presents to the contrary).
Second reason: the “kid” is definitely leaning on something red (cushion, bean bag?) And that red thing goes behind the power socket, not above it. So unless they carefully cut around the bottom of the picture in order to stick it an absurdly low height on the mirrorwall, it’s not attached to that wall.
I didn’t notice the kid…I just thought the fail was that she doesn’t really have anything to bother covering up. :/
Breast fail.
sexy.. very sexy fa-WIN BITCH
yo if i was derr i would fuck the shit out of that mom..like wth fuck that kid…idc if hes in the other room i would soo fuck her
I think it’s a tv in the reflection… looks to me like Moe from the Three Stooges
It is a mirror for sure, the reflected shadows are from the camera flash and therefore the camera never catches the direct shadows and instead just the indirect.
So the only shadows you can see in front of the mirror is the shadow from the reflected flash while the only shadow you can see in the mirror is the shadow from the flash before it hits the mirror.
so all you guys saying that the shadows going different ways is proof that its not a mirror is wrong, thats proof that it is a mirror since photoshopping that effect would be near to impossible.
thats a fail but shes a win
if you noticed th3 kid first im sorry but ur gay
lol. Fuck the kid. She’s one sexy mama! Grooar, mrrrrrrr
Milf Win?
I don’t know who I feel more sorry for… the humiliated woman or the child, scarred for life.
Is that Zoey from Left 4 Dead? Didn’t know she had kids.
Hmm, I wonder if this is also a mindfuck?
Posting nude pics is a sin.
If any of you are retarded, yes it is a mirror. Look at the reflection of the chair
Wow… Is that honestly a fail or win? From the kids point of view it may be a win but from mine it’s a horrible MILF… poor kid :,(
well, if it is a mirror which based on the reflective light it is, i would say that its a full wall mirror because its the only way to logically explain why you would be able to see the mirror down there and because of the reflections of light on both the chair and her back, and as for the child on the red bean bag, i would say hes in the doorway of another room in front of the sexy milf’s mirror
Because i know someones going to say: “oh yeah, well how do you explain the wall outlet?” the wall outlet is in a hole cut in the mirror with a outlet in it…
Indeed it’s pretty simple and obviously a mirror wall. You can see the power outlet and light switch cut out in the mirror. The fail part is that the kid is clearly in front of her, in the mirror reflection you can see the back view of her leg and arm with the kid facing her. No need for someone to take the pic, very easy with a timer on the camera. She’s probably doing pics to catch a man online, should have kept the kid out of view for a better effect.
And wow yeah she is one hot MILF!!!
well that could be her lil brother/sister
that kid is haley joel osmund. That’s a scene from Forrest Gump. He plays little Forrest in it.
Forrest Gump Win!
I said stop moking me ok he is my son and i can show him any boobs i want. also stop looking at me like that
I’d screw her so it is a …………….WINNNNN
who was even looking in the background in the first place?
http://gossipcandy.com/2009/05/shia-labeouf-would-be-with-his-mom/
…yea
holy cow… thats a picture of me… and thats my sister not my mother you losers
(PhotoShopped)
1.Shadows in Supposed mirror go wrong way
2.if it isnt a mirrow the obviouse floating light switches… 100% photoshopped and to top it off look how fake the shadows look in the mirrior
3.Shes sexy
Ozmo – when you send in a pic to post they request that you put “FAIL” on it…
It’s definitely not a TV…
But how will I find that shriveled little dried up carrot stick you call a pecker?