Comments on: Firefox Release Fail http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/ Fail and Epic Fail Pictures and Videos in one blog. For all those precious fail moments, whip out your camera and see your epic fail picture and videos here. Mon, 23 Nov 2009 14:17:03 +0000 http://wordpress.com/ hourly 1 By: test http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-629209 test Mon, 05 Oct 2009 02:31:07 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-629209 >test test <b>test</b> >test
test
test

]]> By: crapsack2009 http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-566220 crapsack2009 Sun, 16 Aug 2009 18:40:10 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-566220 i dont understand this picture? i dont understand this picture?

]]> By: gigiosantos http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-522923 gigiosantos Thu, 16 Jul 2009 18:04:27 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-522923 If u want to say first, at least but a comment after it. OMG Microsoft is making a conspiracy so users of Internet Explorer cant get firefox!!!!!!!!(a good pr move)lol! If u want to say first, at least but a comment after it.
OMG Microsoft is making a conspiracy so users of Internet Explorer cant get firefox!!!!!!!!(a good pr move)lol!

]]> By: bronx http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-474514 bronx Wed, 17 Jun 2009 02:25:23 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-474514 "first" posting is a staple of EVERY comment community unfortunately. “first” posting is a staple of EVERY comment community unfortunately.

]]> By: Wolfess http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-367092 Wolfess Sun, 12 Apr 2009 15:09:53 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-367092 Internet Explorer- Not Firefox. Also the 2.0 is for MAC os Internet Explorer- Not Firefox.

Also the 2.0 is for MAC os

]]> By: Casey http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-352846 Casey Thu, 02 Apr 2009 02:15:05 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-352846 The second part of it is NOT a fail. Firefox came out for Macs later than it did for Windows, so the Mac software is behind the Windows software. Fail to whoever says this is a fail. The second part of it is NOT a fail. Firefox came out for Macs later than it did for Windows, so the Mac software is behind the Windows software. Fail to whoever says this is a fail.

]]> By: Allaiyah http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-346025 Allaiyah Sun, 29 Mar 2009 03:54:18 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-346025 I fail to see why the circled part of the lower image is a fail. ALL software is released in #.#.#.# format. I fail to see why the circled part of the lower image is a fail. ALL software is released in #.#.#.# format.

]]> By: aecsuper http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-328188 aecsuper Tue, 17 Mar 2009 22:06:49 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-328188 That's not a fail. macs are always behind on FireFox releases. That’s not a fail. macs are always behind on FireFox releases.

]]> By: Mike http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-317150 Mike Tue, 10 Mar 2009 02:46:55 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-317150 Dude, the release of Firefox3 was for PCs not macs. the mac version was 2.0.0.14 Dude, the release of Firefox3 was for PCs not macs. the mac version was 2.0.0.14

]]> By: ... http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-302606 ... Sat, 28 Feb 2009 16:35:13 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-302606 I like Firefox... best browser out there... but this is pretty funny. I like Firefox… best browser out there… but this is pretty funny.

]]> By: nic http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-192028 nic Wed, 03 Dec 2008 00:52:08 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-192028 i dont get it why is there and internet explorer browser for ''failfox'' i dont get it why is there and internet explorer browser for ”failfox”

]]> By: oh brother http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-163587 oh brother Tue, 11 Nov 2008 09:47:33 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-163587 i made the mistake of getting a computor with a virus, to remove the ivrus i have to uninstall the software it came with. ie vista. i made the mistake of getting a computor with a virus, to remove the ivrus i have to uninstall the software it came with. ie vista.

]]> By: Jeff Pom http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-137095 Jeff Pom Fri, 17 Oct 2008 14:11:58 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-137095 Bonus points for the person who realized that it's FireFox 3 for Windows, while Mac is on Version 2. Read the print people. It's fine print for a reason. It's a disclaimer. It's 3 for Windows, but if you're on a mac - you're on version 2. Fail - 79, WIN - 1 Bonus points for the person who realized that it’s FireFox 3 for Windows, while Mac is on Version 2.

Read the print people. It’s fine print for a reason. It’s a disclaimer. It’s 3 for Windows, but if you’re on a mac – you’re on version 2.

Fail – 79, WIN – 1

]]> By: overgod http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-118627 overgod Tue, 30 Sep 2008 01:32:29 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-118627 server overload because of many users and yes only v 2 for mac? i cant see the fail server overload because of many users and yes only v 2 for mac? i cant see the fail

]]> By: strongfan http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-101988 strongfan Sun, 14 Sep 2008 21:15:28 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-101988 Last! Last!

]]> By: twig http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-68423 twig Sat, 16 Aug 2008 01:52:13 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-68423 Interfail buttsploder and Crapple MacinFail. Interfail buttsploder and Crapple MacinFail.

]]> By: John Snith http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-64120 John Snith Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:28:29 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-64120 Fail for using Windows in this day and age. Fail for using Windows in this day and age.

]]> By: John Snith http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-64118 John Snith Wed, 13 Aug 2008 05:26:08 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-64118 Windows fails. Use a real OS. Windows fails. Use a real OS.

]]> By: Petra http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-63542 Petra Tue, 12 Aug 2008 18:17:03 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-63542 That's because IE is so stupid that it doesn't recognize addresses without "www" in them. The FAIL belongs to Internet Explorer. That’s because IE is so stupid that it doesn’t recognize addresses without “www” in them. The FAIL belongs to Internet Explorer.

]]> By: fuckers http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-52733 fuckers Sun, 03 Aug 2008 21:27:43 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-52733 firefox wins, ie twats.... ie always breaks down or its too slow.... a fail firefox wins, ie twats…. ie always breaks down or its too slow…. a fail

]]> By: my name is bs http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-48198 my name is bs Wed, 30 Jul 2008 06:03:14 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-48198 me caring fail me caring fail

]]> By: wi http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-48017 wi Wed, 30 Jul 2008 00:26:17 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-48017 SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER MAJOR EPIC FIREFOX FAIL! AND SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER MAJOR EPIC OPERA WIN! SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER MAJOR EPIC FIREFOX FAIL!

AND SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER SUPER MAJOR EPIC OPERA WIN!

]]> By: LH:] http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-47182 LH:] Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:57:29 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-47182 Seventy first. woop. Seventy first.
woop.

]]> By: LH:] http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-47180 LH:] Tue, 29 Jul 2008 13:56:39 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-47180 Ha. Ha.

]]> By: Mike http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-45544 Mike Sun, 27 Jul 2008 15:08:38 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-45544 When I first installed FF3 on Windows, I got the "you have installed 2.0.0.14" message. I still get it with FF3.0.1 patches When I first installed FF3 on Windows, I got the “you have installed 2.0.0.14″ message. I still get it with FF3.0.1 patches

]]> By: Zeon http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-37445 Zeon Wed, 16 Jul 2008 03:23:11 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-37445 IE FAIL IE - Internet Exploiter IE FAIL

IE – Internet Exploiter

]]> By: Anonymous http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-36783 Anonymous Tue, 15 Jul 2008 12:06:24 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-36783 well, seing as it says 2.0.0.14 for MAC OS X..... (although the first pic was in windows, the second was a mac) well, seing as it says 2.0.0.14 for MAC OS X…..

(although the first pic was in windows, the second was a mac)

]]> By: rob http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-36662 rob Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:16:32 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-36662 OMFG!!! have you ever used a mac?! it looks nothing like that! >_> the windows and bars and things in mac look very diffrent to the blue bars and windows of a pc. >_< OMFG!!! have you ever used a mac?! it looks nothing like that! >_>
the windows and bars and things in mac look very diffrent to the blue bars and windows of a pc. >_<

]]> By: qaz http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-36661 qaz Tue, 15 Jul 2008 06:15:49 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-36661 the 'this page cannot be displayed' pic is an add-on for firefox called IETab the ‘this page cannot be displayed’ pic is an add-on for firefox called IETab

]]> By: Anonymous http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-34716 Anonymous Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:06:37 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-34716 Troll FAIL. :) Troll FAIL. :)

]]> By: Anonymous http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-34715 Anonymous Fri, 11 Jul 2008 19:06:13 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-34715 Troll. Troll.

]]> By: yea http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-30278 yea Sun, 06 Jul 2008 14:24:33 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-30278 Firefox sucks balls, why browse the web that microsoft made accessible to the masses, with a program not made by them. Its just another failed attempt to re-write software instead of coming up with a new program people might want. Its like me releasing my own version of msPaint and expecting Adobe to shit their pants. I'll stick with 70% of the world as use IE (+ IE7Pro adds nice extras) Firefox sucks balls, why browse the web that microsoft made accessible to the masses, with a program not made by them. Its just another failed attempt to re-write software instead of coming up with a new program people might want.

Its like me releasing my own version of msPaint and expecting Adobe to shit their pants.

I’ll stick with 70% of the world as use IE (+ IE7Pro adds nice extras)

]]> By: anonymous http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-26649 anonymous Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:38:40 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-26649 flock is firefox, cept that it has built-in features flock is firefox, cept that it has built-in features

]]> By: anonymous http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-26643 anonymous Tue, 01 Jul 2008 14:37:06 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-26643 flock is firefox with built-in features you dumb cunt. flock is firefox with built-in features you dumb cunt.

]]> By: Legion http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-24534 Legion Fri, 27 Jun 2008 18:57:57 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-24534 Moseses, Mac OS hasn't had a port of IE for quite some time... Moseses,

Mac OS hasn’t had a port of IE for quite some time…

]]> By: limitedrapture http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-23465 limitedrapture Thu, 26 Jun 2008 17:37:33 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-23465 And also, that's an IE fail. Pretty much everyone I know dl'd FF3 the day it was released with no problems from FF2, myself included. IE fail, not Firefox. And also, that’s an IE fail. Pretty much everyone I know dl’d FF3 the day it was released with no problems from FF2, myself included.

IE fail, not Firefox.

]]> By: Anonymous http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-23059 Anonymous Thu, 26 Jun 2008 03:48:19 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-23059 no. you are just plain stupid, it was windows. no. you are just plain stupid, it was windows.

]]> By: meromero http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-22988 meromero Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:38:23 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-22988 Whoever posted this is an idiot, as is the person who said it's version 2 of Firefox 3. READ PEOPLE. Is says Firefox 2 for MAC! (Firefox 3 was not compatible with Mac OS X yet). Whoever posted this is an idiot, as is the person who said it’s version 2 of Firefox 3. READ PEOPLE. Is says Firefox 2 for MAC! (Firefox 3 was not compatible with Mac OS X yet).

]]> By: Lames http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-21971 Lames Tue, 24 Jun 2008 14:03:08 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-21971 Last Last

]]> By: Chuck http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-21005 Chuck Mon, 23 Jun 2008 03:37:19 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-21005 I d/led it, tried to make it work. No dice, it is broke. so, I shall remain at 0.14 till they make something that works. I d/led it, tried to make it work.

No dice, it is broke.

so, I shall remain at 0.14 till they make something that works.

]]> By: boris2k http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-20959 boris2k Mon, 23 Jun 2008 01:56:04 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-20959 its version 2 of firefox3 dumbshits who ever posted the pic has failed! its version 2 of firefox3 dumbshits who ever posted the pic has failed!

]]> By: ozyran http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-20879 ozyran Sun, 22 Jun 2008 21:18:05 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-20879 Browser recognition fail! http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/sitemanagement/media/ie404error.png Browser recognition fail!

http://www.yourhtmlsource.com/sitemanagement/media/ie404error.png

]]> By: Fibonacci http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-20626 Fibonacci Sun, 22 Jun 2008 01:18:49 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-20626 Of course it failed - you were viewing it through Internet Explorer! Of course it failed – you were viewing it through Internet Explorer!

]]> By: ozyran http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-20516 ozyran Sat, 21 Jun 2008 15:54:18 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-20516 Yeah, I thought something was odd about the FireFox 3.0 that I had downloaded lol Yeah, I thought something was odd about the FireFox 3.0 that I had downloaded lol

]]> By: Stuff White Parents Like http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-20193 Stuff White Parents Like Fri, 20 Jun 2008 17:13:45 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-20193 stealing food from hungy kids isbetter. stealing food from hungy kids isbetter.

]]> By: Moseses http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-20109 Moseses Fri, 20 Jun 2008 14:30:43 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-20109 Its more likely that whomever took that screen capture is running a mac with a less than new operating system, in which case firefox three wouldnt be the one he would download, it would be 2.0.0.14, the older one that will run on a OS x 10.3.x system. blerg Its more likely that whomever took that screen capture is running a mac
with a less than new operating system, in which case firefox three wouldnt be the
one he would download, it would be 2.0.0.14, the older one that will run on a
OS x 10.3.x system. blerg

]]> By: Taylor http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-19705 Taylor Thu, 19 Jun 2008 19:17:58 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-19705 I just have to say, I haven't seen/heard anyone say GG since I was in like 10th grade, haha. I just have to say, I haven’t seen/heard anyone say GG since I was in like 10th grade, haha.

]]> By: art http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-19373 art Thu, 19 Jun 2008 04:38:07 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-19373 "first" posting will never go away. it is a staple of the failblog comment community “first” posting will never go away. it is a staple of the failblog comment community

]]> By: SAM http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-19275 SAM Wed, 18 Jun 2008 22:20:42 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-19275 Safari FTW! Safari FTW!

]]> By: bored http://failblog.org/2008/06/17/firefox-release-fail/#comment-19057 bored Wed, 18 Jun 2008 15:49:59 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=1289#comment-19057 smoke signals are better smoke signals are better

]]>