Comments on: Minesweeper Fail http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/ Fail and Epic Fail Pictures and Videos in one blog. For all those precious fail moments, whip out your camera and see your epic fail picture and videos here. Sun, 12 Feb 2012 23:21:42 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.com/ By: me http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1354297 Sat, 18 Jun 2011 11:09:50 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1354297 To the third comment on this pic, your a dumbass, it’s the corner that would have no bombs obviously, our a huge fail.

]]> By: Mart http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1346823 Mon, 13 Jun 2011 11:42:47 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1346823 Nope, he had all the other mines flagged already. I’ve seen them show up after you die in Win7, but this is the XP version.

]]> By: MAIA http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1301466 Thu, 05 May 2011 10:03:47 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1301466 Haven’t you ever played Minesweeper? This image is impossible – when you click a bomb, all the bombs arise. This image is FAKE.

]]> By: KoopaConor http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1240399 Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:33:56 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1240399 So have I. It’s rare unless you use a custom minefield.

]]> By: KoopaConor http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1240397 Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:32:22 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1240397 I see you, Tara, and Anonymous all have the same picture.

]]> By: KoopaConor http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1240394 Sun, 13 Mar 2011 05:27:39 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1240394 Expert, I believe.

]]> By: Jeff http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1208199 Sat, 12 Feb 2011 20:43:55 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1208199 They should have designed the game so that if you encounter a pure 50/50 like this at the end of the game (with everything solved except for 50/50s) whichever cell you click on would not be a mine.

]]> By: Printer http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1186856 Mon, 24 Jan 2011 18:33:47 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1186856 Ouch! Punch in the stomach!

]]> By: Uvulu http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-1041408 Fri, 01 Oct 2010 09:17:39 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-1041408 i can tie my shoes in 5 secs using the “ian knot”

]]> By: sembe http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-946788 Mon, 19 Jul 2010 08:39:42 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-946788 in this game i play 50-50 lots of times and the 90% of those times i get it right im lucky :)

]]> By: iv http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-945823 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 19:49:44 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-945823 win

]]> By: poulou http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-945541 Sat, 17 Jul 2010 14:36:11 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-945541 ooh yea but i WON!

http://c1.ac-images.myspacecdn.com/images01/122/l_e011dd9150de299c7e6d5de31943caa0.png

]]> By: Kyle http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-891339 Thu, 03 Jun 2010 20:40:47 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-891339 Sarah, both you and meh are idiots. Victor is right. There is only one rule. The quirks don’t exist. You guys are fools for thinking so. Mines being in the corner are just as likely as them not being there (observe the top left corner of the picture). You must truly be stupid if your extensive playing has not revealed that on the expert level of minesweeper there are often cases where guesswork is needed. Please do this forum and favor and stop posting dumb crap.

]]> By: the reaper http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-890721 Thu, 03 Jun 2010 08:03:14 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-890721 i have yet to encounter a single “mins” anywhere in minesweeper <.<

]]> By: Ryan http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-890411 Wed, 02 Jun 2010 20:38:30 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-890411 Ooooooh,I see it. I got semi-confused and I didn’t really see the two flags right beneath the 2 2′s. I read the comments and I thought that there must be something wrong for it too warrant so much discussion and arguing so I didn’t realize the fact that those 2s were already solved.

]]> By: Games | Solitaire Win http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-889589 Tue, 01 Jun 2010 20:33:50 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-889589 [...] I was always a bigger fan of minesweeper [...]

]]> By: Cyph http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-887693 Sat, 29 May 2010 17:42:51 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-887693 There’s a mine in the top left corner. Now you’ve seen one.

]]> By: Solitaire Win | Funny Moments http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-887582 Sat, 29 May 2010 12:56:49 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-887582 [...] I was always a bigger fan of minesweeper [...]

]]> By: Arambie http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-887389 Sat, 29 May 2010 01:26:16 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-887389 …you guys are idots. The punch line is that it says “fail” on the bottom.

Yikes, people.

]]> By: Duh http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-887329 Fri, 28 May 2010 23:11:21 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-887329 Actually it takes luck, logic, a metal detector, AND flags!

]]> By: Amused http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-886080 Thu, 27 May 2010 19:30:12 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-886080 Yeah, it’s more like linguocentric. Point remains, though, that there’s no law that says people MUST speak English on these forums. It makes sense that someone with Spanish as their first (and possibly only) language will speak Spanish :)

]]> By: Sarah http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-886054 Thu, 27 May 2010 19:18:31 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-886054 Agreed. I play Minesweeper like it’s my religion and I definitely would have put it in the corner instead, just because I play so much and have learned all the little Minesweeper quirks. :D

]]> By: Aeonera http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-885448 Thu, 27 May 2010 08:54:42 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-885448 yea and is this giving anyone else the urge to play minesweeper?

]]> By: Aeonera http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-885447 Thu, 27 May 2010 08:52:41 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-885447 NO USING LONG WORDS

]]> By: Aeonera http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-885445 Thu, 27 May 2010 08:52:07 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-885445 yes its a picture, we got that, this is better then arguing over the difference between a stew and a cassarole and i do that…

]]> By: Aeonera http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-885441 Thu, 27 May 2010 08:50:47 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-885441 it takes luck, logic and a metal detector to sweep mines

]]> By: Aeonera http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-885436 Thu, 27 May 2010 08:48:12 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-885436 …
you fail

]]> By: Aeonera http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-885434 Thu, 27 May 2010 08:44:39 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-885434 … you fail over again… even i know how to play minesweeper, im 14

]]> By: Mart http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-885137 Wed, 26 May 2010 18:57:37 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-885137 There WOULD’ve been a 2…if there wasn’t a bomb in the way.

]]> By: Timmers http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884540 Wed, 26 May 2010 05:25:57 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884540 Those two 2′s are not adjacent to the fail and unrevealed square so they have no bearing on which square the bomb is in. They refer to the two flags directly beneath them.

The only squares with any bearing on the fail and unrevealed square is the 3 directly to the left of the fail and 1 directly beneath that 3.

]]> By: dvana http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884531 Wed, 26 May 2010 04:14:17 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884531 Ha! Win. Er, lose.

]]> By: Patrick http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884463 Wed, 26 May 2010 00:28:50 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884463 Does anyone notice the FAIL in the corner next to the bomb?

]]> By: Zac http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884447 Tue, 25 May 2010 23:45:23 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884447 The things people argue about…

]]> By: Sersoft http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884418 Tue, 25 May 2010 23:07:03 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884418 You guys fail at minesweeper I would know the mine is not in the corner because if it was then a number 2 would show up to the right of that 3.

]]> By: Ryan http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884216 Tue, 25 May 2010 19:48:02 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884216 Uuuh, I might be missing something, but there are two two’s right above the fail and the square next to it. Shouldn’t that meant that those two must be mines, since they’re the only two that touch the squares that say 2? Don’t want to sound like a smartass, just want to be sure. So isn’t it not actually a 50/50 chance? Once again, don’t want to sound like a smartass.

]]> By: Kevindubrow http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884211 Tue, 25 May 2010 19:44:08 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884211 Why is “you’re” in quotation marks?

]]> By: Kevindubrow http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884207 Tue, 25 May 2010 19:42:46 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884207 You’re not being racist by not wanting languages other than English on this site.

]]> By: Rain http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884165 Tue, 25 May 2010 18:36:00 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884165 The fail here is not that he hit the wrong last square, but that he had to flag the bombs as he went…wussy!

]]> By: Mgumbo http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-884004 Tue, 25 May 2010 15:20:44 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-884004 It takes more than cold logic to sweep mines.

]]> By: meh http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883908 Tue, 25 May 2010 13:34:14 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883908 Yes, but eventually you do realise there is a pattern to where they put the mines in – and you only figure that out, enough for you to guess right, BY PLAYING THE GAME.

]]> By: Solitaire Win | Funulo. The Fun. http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883769 Tue, 25 May 2010 09:00:13 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883769 [...] I was always a bigger fan of minesweeper [...]

]]> By: Blah http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883768 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:59:43 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883768 As has already been said, those number 2 squares are not touching either of the 2 blocks that needed to be clicked, so thier values are irrelevant, only squares that are adjacent, i.e. touching, including diagonals, count. It could have been either of the 2, since the 1 and 3 are both touching both squares. 2 of the 3 have been taken already leaving either of those 2 squares as the remaining bomb. Was a guess, person guessed wrong. The end

]]> By: Victor http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883765 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:52:13 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883765 LMAO. It’s so funny how 50 % of the people in the comments say it was a 50-50 chance, and the other half say it was obvious, yet both seem equally certain. The only thing that’s obvious is that the people who claim it’s obvious clearly haven’t played much minesweeper to fully comprehend the rules. Or, not even rules, THERE IS JUST ONE RULE: If there is a number on a tile, it means that the same number of bombs will be in the eight (or less) squares surrounding that tile. ONE RULE. How can you mess that up? BY NOT PLAYING THE GAME.

]]> By: Victor http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883758 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:43:27 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883758 Wow. Interpreting-comment-fail. epicwindad is on your side of the argument, Talfreo. That was a sad display. ^^

Also, he’s *quoting* the “mins”, as one would do sarcastically. Get it now? :) lol.

]]> By: Solitaire Win http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883747 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:25:14 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883747 [...] I was always a bigger fan of minesweeper [...]

]]> By: Solitaire Win « WTFUX http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883746 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:22:38 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883746 [...] I was always a bigger fan of minesweeper [...]

]]> By: Talfreo http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883735 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:11:32 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883735 Dude. The number represents how many bombs are in the eight squares that SURROUND the uncovered square! Jesus Christ! Don’t make harder that it is!

Adjacent=TOUCHING the square

The bomb wasn’t directly touching the square.

Learn your words, and your Minesweeper. That is all. And I’m leaving this gigantic mass of fails alone now, while I still have my sanity.

]]> By: Talfreo http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883730 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:07:06 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883730 It’s clear a lot of people don’t understand the fundamentals of Minesweeper…

]]> By: Talfreo http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883729 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:06:12 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883729 Oh really? Then go look at the top left corner, twat.

And I thought we were talking about MINES being in corners, not MINUTES.

Spelling and I-Think-I-Know-It-All Fail.

]]> By: Solitaire Win - FAIL Blog: Epic Fail Funny Pictures and Funny Videos of Owned, Pwned and Fail Moments http://failblog.org/2008/04/15/minesweeper-fail/comment-page-1/#comment-883722 Tue, 25 May 2010 08:01:39 +0000 http://failblog.wordpress.com/?p=599#comment-883722 [...] I was always a bigger fan of minesweeper [...]

]]>