Fail, Owned and Pwn moments in pictures and videos. Share fails, pwns, and owns with the world on FAIL Blog.

 

« Previous | Next »


Fail Again Crane


Thanks to Anonymous for:

failagaincrane.jpg

Incorrect source or offensive?
  • Share on Facebook
  • Copy & paste this:

» 130 Failures in Communication

  1. Anonymous says:

    Unfortunately that last frame is completely fake.

  2. Niggy Tardust says:

    Yup, the last shot is a ‘shop job. Pretty funny if you just pretend it isn’t though!

  3. Versi says:

    What a shame, i laughed so hard and now i discover it was a photoshop!

  4. Fail Blog

    Seit einigen Tagen habe ich das Fail Blog in meiner ‘muss ich lesen’ Liste und wahrlich, ich werfe mich bei jedem neuen Beitrag förmlich weg!

    Im Fail Blog werden Schnappschüsse und Zufallsaufnahmen veröffentlicht, auf denen Missgeschicke oder das…

  5. Curious says:

    How do we know the last one is a Photoshop job? Why aren’t they ALL suspect? And why does only one frame have those dead branches along the shore in the foreground?

    • Lancer says:

      OMIGOSH YOU ARE SO ON TO SOMETHING!!!
      Also, looking at the image, the one with the dead branches also is missing a yellow sign that was in the other ones… in fact, there are a bunch of ways to tell that the third one is fake… nice goin Curious!

      • RuNB4iKiLLYoU says:

        actually, if you look closer you will see that the photograph was not in the same spot in the second picture. Yea Maybe they are fakes. But who know?!…

        • mick says:

          it looks like the third picture was taken at a different angle, maybe from a nearby shore? and perhaps the photographer was standing behind a tree? i wouldn’t think it would have any leaves because of how everyone in the picture(s) is(are) wearing long sleeves/jackets…

      • Anonymous says:

        Uhmm.. you never saw a bin? and yeah, this one IS yellow

      • nycgirl says:

        Actually, the in the third image, the sign isn’t missing, people are surrounding it. Even if shopped, there’s no reason, taking into account the base images, to remove the sign.

        The branches could easily be explained by the fact that all of the first three pictures are taken at different angles. The fourth one is a shop using the 2nd one as its base. Note that it’s the same camera angle. And as someone else already mentioned: the traffic on the road is the same.

      • lol says:

        Newb -_- The 4th frame is a shop from the 2nd frame… You can see that the red truck is just being cut out from the 3rd frame and nudged downwards. then they cut out the green truck from the 3rd picture and placed it behind the layer with the red truck.

        This can be proven by the fact that in the 2nd picture there is some cars in behind, wich are not there in the 3rd picture but replaced with some other cars. Then in the 4th picture they are back… suspicious? you can also see that in the 3rd picture there are people standing around the yellow thing, its not removen… the camera angle is just different, same with the dead branches…

        The 3 first are real as heck, but the fourth is fake…

        One last proof that the fourth is fake… why in H*LL would people stand underneath the green truck? xD there are people at the place it would have been standing before it fell into the water.

        hope i formulated myself well enough… this post should atleast be enough proof to convict the suspect! :O

        One last note… off topic, but just fun :P in the 3rd picture you can see a new red truck behind the green one with the original white car on its back xD and it looks pretty damn in shape to have had the red truck on its top out there in the water :P

        • mick says:

          oh yeah, one more thing;
          “why in H*LL would people stand underneath the green truck?”
          where did they get the people to photoshop into the spot where the truck had just been? (hint hint might they have run towards the truck when it started tipping…?just because they were where the truck WAS, doesn’t mean that they were there all along) they aren’t in any of those positions in the other shots…
          ~
          ~
          read Ben’s comment from October 16th, 2008 at 1:42 pm (it’s up near the top)
          i don’t see that the fourth is fake: the red and white boats; the white boat is moved further back in the second shot and at a different angle, but also: the quality of the two shots are different; somone probably had a tripod set up on the other shore, and didn’t get the third shot, but did get the 2nd and 4th, and in between shots, their camera got just a tad bit out of focus.
          ~
          ~
          how quickly you people jump to the conclusion that everything is faked. maybe if you really thought about the situation, you would probably realize that all those little details can be explained.

        • bobbyb says:

          If the 4th is shopped from the 2nd, why can you see MORE of the water in forth picture than in the second? and they must have put a lot of effort into completely changing the surface of the water. No one has good evidence of a shop.

  6. Ted says:

    Look at the cars and people in the background. In the third image, the red car from the second image is gone and is replaced by a black panel van and a bunch of people. In the final image, those are all gone, and the red car is back.

    • RuNB4iKiLLYoU says:

      You have to say that severals minutes or even hours past between those pictures. you know a crane is not as fast as you think! Lot of details can be changed in one hour

      • ZapTap says:

        not really, the little white dinghy in the background hardly moved :P

        • mick says:

          maybe because it was tied up? and it only moved a bit because it’s FLOATING on WATER that MOVES. (all those caps aren’t because i’m mad or think you’re stupid, but just for clarity)

  7. tomvd says:

    Damn, I was going to send this in myself as well. :)

  8. Slavok Ljapochkin says:

    I’m from russia! My name is slavok ljapochkin. Give me computer please!!!

  9. Hunter says:

    There are larger versions of these pictures on the internet where it is very obvious it is a shop job. The man standing in the last shot facing away from the water in a white shirt appears in exactly the same position in an earlier shot. Why not just show the original machine falling into the water and having to be fished out. It was funny when I saw that, then I saw the shopped one and it just pissed me off.

  10. Yahriel says:

    Even if it is a shop, having a crane fish a crane out of the water is still fail.

  11. raincoaster says:

    How is it less funny if it’s fictional? Nobody drowned, therefore it’s boring?

    It brought a smile to my face.

  12. ыыыыыыыыыы says:

    боян!

  13. [...] un blog llamado failblog en el que su autor se dedica a poner fotos de esas de situaciones peculiares o estúpidas. Otro al que heché un vistazo despues de encontrarme el título del post en meneame [...]

  14. [...] manche Bilder sind alt, gestellt oder teilweise sogar eine Photomontage aber lustig ist es dennoch! Lesezeichen erstellen/Beitrag suchen [...]

  15. Adam says:

    So why the hell did the guy below plagiarize Saul Williams’ alter ego name, Niggy Tardust?

  16. Josh says:

    It would have been better if he had stopped before the “and…” picture. But I agree with Yahriel, a crane fishing another crane out of the water is Fail. So what is comedically best? Having just the first two pictures, having the first two pictures followed by a random third picture, or having the first three pictures followed by a photoshopped picture so that the third picture would not be random?

  17. mark says:

    photoshop fail

  18. Hellomyfriend says:

    My dad saw this. The last one is photoshopped though…

  19. arturofonseca says:

    Reminded me of this helicopter fail video…http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=7mfygNjwm_U

  20. Patrick Gray says:

    Too bad its a fake. I died laughing when I first saw it.

    Great Job!

  21. CSBlakebrough says:

    It’s not all fake – the white van really did go in, as did the first crane. Only the bigger crane going in is fake, the rest really did happen.

  22. AGP says:

    As a practical matter, you couldn’t tip over that larger crane. You’ll notice that is has a large stabilizing arm that has been deployed. With that in place, there is no way to tip the truck as in the picture, the boom would snap before that would happen (that’s the whole point of the stabilizer).

  23. Anonymous says:

    Photoshop…. That happened in Ireland and I heard it on the news…. The last one only is photoshoped… Only in Ireland lol

  24. Joe Bloggs says:

    Photoshoped…. that happened in Ireland. I heard it on the news. Just the last shot is photshoped. Only in Ireland… lol

  25. Maggalo says:

    Dude the red car disapears

  26. johnny says:

    the last shot of the crane falling into the water is photoshopped. but the rest really happened as in the pictures. it happened two years ago in west galway (Roundstone if my memory is correct) about 15 miles west of where i live. the car driver left the handbrake off and the car was fortunately unoccupied when it rolled backwards off the quay.

    • gruhn says:

      Yup, Roundstone.

      (to others) It’s “clearly ‘shopped” because the elements in the bottom picture are exactly the same elements in the second last. Cut out truck, rotate, move. Amongst others.

  27. RichardProctor says:

    Not that it’s not established that the third is a photoshop, but there isn’t even a splash. The crane is slipping majestically into the water.

  28. cosmo says:

    “Photoshop…. That happened in Ireland and I heard it on the news…. The last one only is photoshoped… Only in Ireland lol”

    Confirmed – guy i went to college with had a photo of this, think it was in Gweedore or somewhere else in Connemara (west Ireland)

  29. Jokke says:

    It happened in Norway!!

  30. James says:

    FAIL photoshopped

  31. alexcandra says:

    yup, tru. Fail photoshop

  32. Kyle says:

    True until the last frame. Check Snopes.com.

  33. Anonymous says:

    I seriously hope lots of people died.

  34. Fail says:

    lol

    Its the water that make the vehicle heavier…
    stupidity……

  35. Tracy says:

    This one was on Snopes. (link higher in the thread) all are real except the last crane falling in.

  36. Niels Esp says:

    i´ve seen a 5th photo that is missing from here…
    that is a photo where there is a large ship pulling the green truck out of the water..
    google it

  37. Danish says:

    The boat looks more red in one than the other so obviously the boat must be photo shopped as well! =O

  38. Simonioio says:

    These are better pictures of the same event – though the last green crane clearly does not fall in – it rescued the first crane, and car, successfully:

    http://www.vertikal.net/images/stories/000852.jpg

    and

    http://www.vertikal.net/images/stories/000850.jpg

    Enchante mes amies, Simon xxx

  39. Anthony says:

    LOL this one is one of the funniest ive seen

  40. local says:

    both cranes did fall it slid in as it could not take the weight they as the car was still tied to the other crane i know this as i come from near roundstone were this happened and the owner of the car was goin out with my cousin no photo shop was done as i seen the same pic in the local news paper the connemara advertiser

  41. OllieD says:

    This could only happen in Oirelund :p

  42. Spike2012 says:

    It looks to be palfinger Hi-ab cranes, most of which “lock out” with an alarm sounding if it is lifting too much weight. I use one for removing 10 metre concrete lamp posts, and even with that alarm sounding there are ways to still move the object (tele boom in slightly, slew object then continue to lift) but using human sight you can see the vehicle tilt – at which point you STOP. lol

    Im betting that if the alarm was sounding here, it was ignored… if it didnt sound then the visual checks to the vehicle were ignored. I mean look at that back end of the orange hi-ab. Mental.

    In my honest opinion, lifting something thats double the hight BELOW my vehicle is stupid and a mobile crane should be used. (not a vehicle mounted crane)

    P.S were the legs even down on the orange hi-ab?? Hmm looks like they werent!

  43. james m says:

    they arnt fake i saw that on the news they just shopped the video to get those frames

    • KipperFillets says:

      See the cars in the background.
      Frame 1 and 2, the red and black ones are on the causeway.
      Frame 3, replaced by a black people carrier.
      Frame 4, back as they were in frame 1 & 2! Obviously frame 4 is a composite from one of the first two frames and the 3rd one.
      I too have seen the first three images many years ago. Obviously someone thought it would be funnier to make it look like the next crane fell in too.

  44. BigVik says:

    It’s clear that these people are french.

  45. Iklan Baris says:

    Very funny pictures… ilike it

  46. nice photos.. thanks for share

  47. Destinii Haruya says:

    I was emailed this non-failstamped by someone who lived near where it happened, and the last pic wasn’t in there. Seeing as it appears shopped, as well…

  48. LOL this one is one of the funniest ive seen..

  49. george says:

    someone beat me to it. its fake! the last frame i mean

  50. amis says:

    lol notice how the sky is dark, light, light, dark :/?

  51. rikos says:

    the 4th picture has the same cars parked as the 1st and 2nd, while the 3rd is different. Just from that you can tell 4th is fake.

  52. kukface says:

    Arh, just study the 4th picture for 5 seconds and you see it is a shooop. They cut the crane out and tilted it, if you study the way it is falling down and compare it to how it stands, you also see its a shoopdidoop. Don’t be so gullible people.

  53. FunnyDevil says:

    Rather nice place you’ve got here. Thank you for it. I like such topics and everything that is connected to this matter. I would like to read more on that blog soon.

    Truly yours

  54. mike rum 'n coke says:

    comment fail to all who think the green truck pics are shopped

  55. giz in my pants says:

    This is real. I should know I was in the yellow truck. I died. And now im the ghost of xmas past. tut tut to all u doubters.

  56. MGS says:

    this is my favorite fail on this website.

  57. Failedskater says:

    This was in Galicia (Spain)hahahhahaha

  58. Daniel says:

    I believe to first part is real, but the last with the one truck lifting the other …. I doubt. If it was real, where’s the water splashing you got when the car and truck fell in? Surely two trucks would cause quite a stir. I’m just sayin’ ….

  59. [...] posted in February 2008 Incorrect source or offensive?water, cars, towing, G-rated, [...]

  60. [...] Originally posted in February 2008 [...]

  61. [...] Originally posted in February 2008 [...]

  62. [...] Originally posted in February 2008 [...]

  63. Randy London says:

    Strange… I just found your blog by searching for “Ikea furniture building tips”‘ on Yahoo. But I can’t find any articles on that topic on here?

  64. friv says:

    very cool. I like this games

  65. y3 says:

    thanks for the tip! I am using beyond compare now for both diff and merge.

  66. friv says:

    Thanks Admin very nice share!

  67. barbie says:

    I agree. I think they are all real.

  68. I’m really impressed with your writing abilities as smartly as with the structure in your blog. Is this a paid subject matter or did you modify it your self? Anyway keep up the excellent high quality writing, it is uncommon to look a nice weblog like this one these days..


Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

Gravatar
WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Newsletter Sign-up