Oh yeah, mark them as ’shop’d and say who posted it…
That way, the rest of us can play around with the pictures
without having to find it online, DL it and UL it afterwards…
(one of the many fine things about photobucket: URL uploading…)
5…..4….3….2….Huston we have a problem
Houston: what is it shuttle 52
shuttle 52: it just occurred to me that the shuttle is upside down…
Houston: dont be crazy 52 your fine
shuttle 52: okay but if we hit the earth before the moon i will harm you in many ways understand?
Houston: *gulp* understood
shuttle 52: good now fix us
Houston HA HA YEAH RIGHT ONE LIFT OFF
Zorrox,
Sorry to inform you that you are wrong. This is clearly photoshop. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. Haha.. I work at NASA. I see this stuff just about everyday.
Well, Wrong way, straigth on the floor, like Mr Bush in Iraq.
Hope you’ll get a brainy president next time.
God save america, and dont’ mind the sort of rats who came in America n’ pretended to be French President : it’s a guy we dropped off after he tried to convince us he was the natural son of Lafayette and Bonaparte the first.
Best regards America, Salutations cordiales from France…
there is no word but fail for you. no shuttle is launched like that. the aerodynamics of having huge thrust cones opening thin the direction that you
are traveling in at hypersonic speeds in the earths atmosphere is absolutely ridiculous. FAIL!!!
where the hell did you come up with that??? an explosion of those proportions would have killed anyone on site, as all the fuel in one preflight, ready shuttle, going off at the same time is almost equivalent to a tactical nuclear warhead, i.e., no cover-up would be possible.
LMFAO! even if that is a photoshop, its still uber mega epic fail, anyone who has the time and energy to make that good of a fake deserves a pat on the back.
I’m amazed that nobody’s realized that Photoshop or no, this would not be a fail but would work just fine. Not as well as the right way, but it wouldn’t fail.
Er, no. Most of the shuttle’s thrust comes from the engines ON the shuttle, not the solid rocket boosters. You see the giant fuel tank bolted to the orbiter? That’s for the shuttle engines. Why? Because it needs those engines to reach orbit!
Pics like this shouldn’t go up in the first place. They’re just… sad.
a pathetic photoshop, does anyone actually believe that this mistake is possible to make. I think someone would notice well before it was rolled out. and alex you are a fail. even if the shuttle didn’t provide most of the thrust (which it does) it still wouldn’t work for so many reasons one of which is if you fired both shutle and solid boosters it would just end up spinning end on end
Right idea on the External Tank (ET), wrong engine destination. The ET has fuel for the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) to provide the continuous thrust needed to reach a height that would allow the Shuttle to reach low earth orbit. The Shuttle engines are used from launch, but are not the primary power source for launch.
But I agree, this pic is a twofail. Photoshop fail and Posting fail. Too badly done and too obviously faked.
Fuel explanation fail. The Solid Rocket Boosters (AKA Solid Rocket FUEL Boosters) are packed with, oh what was that now, Oh yeah, Solid Rocket FUEL. The external tank feeds the shuttles main engines. That’s why the SRBs continued to burn and fly in different directions when the Challenger blew up. They had to be remotely destroyed or they would have continued in uncontrolled flight.
Hahahahahha………….da’z good, but all you are wrong. You fail. THe thing would take off, then when the booster falls off and the rocket takes off by itself, only then would you crash and burn (at the same time)
wow this is a terrible job of photoshopping!!!!
you have to at least make sure it looks good…
plus they spend billions of dollars on space shuttles, i am pretty sure that they will not do something that dumb
that is a major photshop fail. you can even see the original shadow that shows it was originally normal. how is that allowed? i coulda done a better job..then again, i would hope so since i did major in graphic design
That’s impossible because there are two fuel pipes at the wings and one pipe at the nose. The shuttle wouldn’t be able to hold on in a position like that.
They’re only funny if they’re real.
Photoshop fail
he omly used the flip tool phailo-shop
post fail. take the retarded pics down. or at least show them with the fakers’ picture and bio.
Oh yeah, mark them as ’shop’d and say who posted it…
That way, the rest of us can play around with the pictures
without having to find it online, DL it and UL it afterwards…
(one of the many fine things about photobucket: URL uploading…)
Well you know….. that is a pretty good photoshopping job… he at least deserves credit for that… even though its not that funny…
It sucked!!
I concur the shading is TERRIBLE.
The American flag is flipped–obviously.
It’s an okay ’shop, at best.
5…..4….3….2….Huston we have a problem
Houston: what is it shuttle 52
shuttle 52: it just occurred to me that the shuttle is upside down…
Houston: dont be crazy 52 your fine
shuttle 52: okay but if we hit the earth before the moon i will harm you in many ways understand?
Houston: *gulp* understood
shuttle 52: good now fix us
Houston HA HA YEAH RIGHT ONE LIFT OFF
…fail
*splode*
No, No
this is the way shuttles are launched…
they go up tail first, then they rotate in mid-air.
Viewer understanding FAIL
Actually I think NASA is now also planning missions to the center of the Earth
First few missions will be manned.
After that, they’ll be unmanned. There ‘ll be women on board also.
On departure that is.
Unmanned and Unwomaned on return.
Mans are these guys lucky to be going to such an interesting place…
^^^^^ Check out this picture… Real picture… Did this have time or room to flip within seconds of take off? No. You Fail…….
Wow, thank-you.
Zorrox,
Sorry to inform you that you are wrong. This is clearly photoshop. It doesnt take a rocket scientist to figure that one out. Haha.. I work at NASA. I see this stuff just about everyday.
No, I’m sorry but they are not.
Look at any video ever of a shuttle taking off.
Uhh, guys? He was joking..
Comment fail….
Space Shuttles dont go to the moon
I am glad everyone agrees photoshop isn’t that funny
im horny
now im really horny
serioulsy. this is soooo stupid.
this is quite accurate, actually, NASA is a FAIL
…this is where all of our government cash goes….
Wrong.
Chris fails.
Wrong.
OMFG peeps will critique ANYTHING fails.
Wrong, this whole thread fails. It was mounted that way on purpose.
Epic photoshop identification fail
That about sums up the whole Space Shuttle Program. LOL!
It’s called Nasa i dont know how you could not know that.
That’s awesome. Our orange kitty sits and watches our pet rats like he’s watching television. Or a tennis match on TV perhaps.
Eep! Wrong comment thread. I fail!
Well, Wrong way, straigth on the floor, like Mr Bush in Iraq.
Hope you’ll get a brainy president next time.
God save america, and dont’ mind the sort of rats who came in America n’ pretended to be French President : it’s a guy we dropped off after he tried to convince us he was the natural son of Lafayette and Bonaparte the first.
Best regards America, Salutations cordiales from France…
Greatest French Hero — Napoleon. Actually, an Italian. France fails.
Corsican not Italian. you fail.
HISTORY FAILURE!
Not you; I meant this entire thread, and any other historical inaccuracieeeee
Uh…wow? A photoshopped picture of a space shuttle has something to do with America’s president. Who’s the bright one, now?
ME! ME! ……No…?
The french built the Eiffel Tower so they’d have somewhere really high up to wave white flags from…
FRANCE = FAIL.
that is just mean
no, that’s awesome
lol!
Was the space shuttle program outsourced? Someone must have misunderstood the “back pack” concept.
Tech support was recently outsourced to India
Unintentionally Racist Failure
Liberal Comment Fail.
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist to…
I don’t see the problem? Isn’t that how they’re launched? National Aeronautics and Photoshoping Administration.
you were being sarcastic right?
NICE CAT… WHAT A SEC… I FAIL!!!
yes you do
Chris is right. These fake fails blow.
Anyone can photoshop.
I can’t. I don’t have money.
I don’t either, but there’s more than one way to skin a cat, ya know.
Whaa? I don’t get it
you are all stupid. NASA actually launched the space shuttle pangea the wrong way in 1994. 6 men and women were lost. the government covered it up.
There was never a shuttle of that name, you twit.
Fail!
Aren’t there usually 7 aboard a space craft? Did one survive? LOL
you guys are soo stupid that is the way the space shuttle is sapposed to be launched it comes off the rocket in space
You fail on so many levels.
They do NOT launch it upside down -.-
there is no word but fail for you. no shuttle is launched like that. the aerodynamics of having huge thrust cones opening thin the direction that you
are traveling in at hypersonic speeds in the earths atmosphere is absolutely ridiculous. FAIL!!!
Then how do you know about it……? Unless….you’re a FED! HIDE THE ALIENS!
where the hell did you come up with that??? an explosion of those proportions would have killed anyone on site, as all the fuel in one preflight, ready shuttle, going off at the same time is almost equivalent to a tactical nuclear warhead, i.e., no cover-up would be possible.
Yea I agree….you should remove faked photos. It undermined the credibility of the entire blog.
who ever said things had to be real to be funny? you fail!
You’re a retard.
Ever heard the term “ignorance is bliss”?
It doesn’t take a rocket scientist. It takes a 3-year-old. Makes me wonder who we’re employing to put shuttles on the right way………………………
apes?
Grapes?
Grape apes?
Grapples????
Granny Smith apples??????
LMFAO! even if that is a photoshop, its still uber mega epic fail, anyone who has the time and energy to make that good of a fake deserves a pat on the back.
it’s not that good of a photoshop though, look at the outline around the shuttle… still, a good joke nonetheless.
IMHO, obvious fakes can be just as entertaining as real misfortunes if they’re original, but what do I know from funny?
Clearly, you don’t even know funny.
Come on! That’s a very lame photshop job. It’s not a pat on the back they deserve but a punch in the stomach
worst. photoshop. ever.
“..even if that is a photoshop…” really?
*lmao @ Jason Dragon*
This picture is so incredibly stupid. I have to agree with the others that blatant fakes like this make the entire site less funny.
I’m amazed that nobody’s realized that Photoshop or no, this would not be a fail but would work just fine. Not as well as the right way, but it wouldn’t fail.
Er, no. Most of the shuttle’s thrust comes from the engines ON the shuttle, not the solid rocket boosters. You see the giant fuel tank bolted to the orbiter? That’s for the shuttle engines. Why? Because it needs those engines to reach orbit!
Pics like this shouldn’t go up in the first place. They’re just… sad.
thrust issues aside, aerodynamically the shuttle would break apart, not unlike the challenger
a pathetic photoshop, does anyone actually believe that this mistake is possible to make. I think someone would notice well before it was rolled out. and alex you are a fail. even if the shuttle didn’t provide most of the thrust (which it does) it still wouldn’t work for so many reasons one of which is if you fired both shutle and solid boosters it would just end up spinning end on end
Long, unnecessary explanation fail.
Faaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaaakeeeeeeeeeee
remove, please
photoshop
three… two… one… BLOWUP!
Damn, my Grandpa Should not have retired, we wouldnt have shit like this on the Space Shuttle. Damn Noobs.
Double post.
I know its a fake.
Yup, photoshop fails are pants. That’s what worth1000.com is for
Come on, people!
So an image is photoshopped. Who cares? We can still laugh at it.
And then we can laugh at whoever had the time to do this.
Not even good photoshop. Perspective all wrong.
Fails twice–once for trying, and once for failing.
This is failblog, not funnyblog, not photoshopblog.
NASA is American. It shows.
Gullible/prejudice fail.
Yes. even being an american, we still have some real idiots here.
Is this photoshopped? I couldn’t tell.
soddinutter
are you retarded?
Europe fails even worse with their rockets.
And China
and Russia
Obviously fake, yet the image concept is funny. ^^
Not sure what fails more – the quality of the photoshop, or the people who think the majority of the thrust comes from the space shuttle main engines.
Right idea on the External Tank (ET), wrong engine destination. The ET has fuel for the Solid Rocket Boosters (SRBs) to provide the continuous thrust needed to reach a height that would allow the Shuttle to reach low earth orbit. The Shuttle engines are used from launch, but are not the primary power source for launch.
But I agree, this pic is a twofail. Photoshop fail and Posting fail. Too badly done and too obviously faked.
Fuel explanation fail. The Solid Rocket Boosters (AKA Solid Rocket FUEL Boosters) are packed with, oh what was that now, Oh yeah, Solid Rocket FUEL. The external tank feeds the shuttles main engines. That’s why the SRBs continued to burn and fly in different directions when the Challenger blew up. They had to be remotely destroyed or they would have continued in uncontrolled flight.
Our tax dollars put to good use.
– probably designed by bush
Hahahahahha………….da’z good, but all you are wrong. You fail. THe thing would take off, then when the booster falls off and the rocket takes off by itself, only then would you crash and burn (at the same time)
^—–Check out my cool picture!(%)yinyang
wow this is a terrible job of photoshopping!!!!
you have to at least make sure it looks good…
plus they spend billions of dollars on space shuttles, i am pretty sure that they will not do something that dumb
it’s photoshopped. they wouldn’t make a mistake like that
YA THINK?
that is a major photshop fail. you can even see the original shadow that shows it was originally normal. how is that allowed? i coulda done a better job..then again, i would hope so since i did major in graphic design
That’s impossible because there are two fuel pipes at the wings and one pipe at the nose. The shuttle wouldn’t be able to hold on in a position like that.
Pretty obvious photoshop because of the shadow…
DANM I ALWAYS DID IT THE WRONG WAY WELL I GUESS I COULD START DOING IT RIGHT FROM NOW ON
failshop
uh Huston… not to be a nagger or anything but or shuttle’s kind of… upside-down…
ugh, it’s always “Huston, we have a problem…” with you. Seriously!
dude, i can photoshop better than that with my left nut.
take it down it’s fake i only like wasting my time with real fails thank you
That has got to be a photoshop. NASA would never be THAT stupid…would they?!
some one put photoshop fail and repost it!
The Soviets ACTUALLY did that with their orbital battle station “Polyus”, it failed to turn around and crashed.See Astronautix.com Polyus page
This is photo shopped he posted how he did it on youtube even when he uploaded it cheek it out:
Damn I failed…
i recall watching this on TV, the space shuttle went right through the ground!
well he photo shopped it